Pseudo-admittance bilateral telemanipulation with guidance virtual fixtures

14th Symposium onHaptics Interfaces for Virtual Environment andTeleoperator Systems 2006 - Proceedings

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 169-175

  Abbott, Jake J ^a,b   Okamura, Allison M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Admittance control; Force control; Rate control; Telemanipulation; Teleoperation; Virtual fixtures; Virtual mechanisms

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; FORCE CONTROL; PRECISION ENGINEERING; ROBOTICS;

ADMITTANCE CONTROL; RATE CONTROL; TELEMANIPULATION; TELEOPERATION; VIRTUAL FIXTURES; VIRTUAL MECHANISMS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 33750952147     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/haptic.2006.1627057     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. J. J. Abbott. Virtual Fixtures for Bilateral Telemanipulation. PhD thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 2005.
2. A. Bettini, P. Marayong, S. Lang, A. M. Okamura, and G. D. Hager. Vision-assisted control for manipulation using virtual fixtures. IEEE Trans. Robotics, 20(6):953-966, 2004.
3. A. Casals, L. Munoz, and J. Amat. Workspace deformation based teleoperation for the increase of movement precision. In Proc. IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 2824-2829, 2003.
4. M. C. Çavuşoǧlu. D. Feygin, and F. Tendick. A critical study of the mechanical and electrical properties of the PHANToM haptic interface and improvements for high-performance conrol. Presence. 11 (6):555-568, 2002.
5. J. J. Craig. Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, second edition. 1989.
6. J. J. Craig, P. Hsu, and S. S. Sastry. Adaptive control of mechanical manipulators. Int'l. J. Robotics Research. 6(2): 16-28, 1987.
7. Intuitive Surgical, http://www.intuitivesurgical.com.
8. W. S. Kim, F. Tendick, S. R. Ellis, and L. W. Stark, A comparison of position and rate control for telemanipulators with consideration of manipulator system dynamics. IEEE J. Robotics and Automation, RA-3(5):426-436, 1987.
9. M. E. Kontz and W. J. Book. Position/rate haptic control of a hydraulic forklift. In Proc. ASME Int'l. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pages 801-808, 2003.
10. P. D. Lawrence, S. E. Salcudean, N. Sepehri, D. Chan, S. Bachmann, N. Parker, M. Zhu, and R. Frenette. Coordinated and force-feedback control of hydraulic excavators. In Proc. 4th Int'l. Symposium on Experimental Robotics, pages 181-194, 1995.
11. A. Micaelli, C. Bidard, and C. Andriot. Decoupling control based on virtual mechanisms for telemanipulation. In Proc. IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 1924-1931, 1998.
12. F. Mobasser and K. Hashtrudi-Zaad. Implementation of a rate mode impedance reflecting teleoperation controller on a haptic simulation system. In Proc. IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 1974-1979, 2004.
13. C. A. Moore, M. A. Peshkin, and J. E. Colgate. Cobot implementation of virtual paths and 3-D virtual surfaces. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation. 19(2):347-351, 2003.
14. J. Roy and L. L. Whitcomb. Adaptive force control of position/velocity controlled robots: Theory and experiment. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 18(2):121-137, 2002.
15. SensAble Technologies, http://www.sensable.com.
16. N. Turro, O. Khatib, and E. Coste-Maniere. Haptically augmented teleoperation. In Proc. IEEE Int'l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 386-392, 2001.
17. R. L. Williams II, J. M. Henry, M. A. Murphy, and D. W. Repperger. Naturally-transitioning rate-to-force control in free and constrained motion. ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 121(3):425-432, 1999.
18. C. B. Zilles and J. K. Salisbury. A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int'l. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 146-151, 1995.