NIPF tax incentives: Do they make a difference?

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 16-21

  Brockett, Charles D ^a   Gebhard, Luke ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY PRODUCTION; LAND USE; TAX SYSTEM; TIMBER INDUSTRY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033059659     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ANDERSON, J.E. 1993. Use-value property tax assessment: Effect on land development. Land Economics 69(3): 263-69.
2. BLISS, J.C., S.K. NEPAL., R.T. BROOKS JR., and M.D. LARSEN. 1997. In the mainstream: Environmental attitudes of mid-south forest owners. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 21(1):37-43.
3. BOURKE, L., and A.E. LULOFF. 1994. Attitudes toward the management of nonindustrial private forest land. Society and Natural Resources 7:445-57.
4. BRUNSON, M.W., D.T. YARROW, S.D. ROBERTS, D.C. GUYNN JR., and M.R. KUHNS. 1996. Nonindustrial private forest owners and ecosystem management: Can they work together? Journal of Forestry 94(6):14-21.
5. COLYER, D. 1998. Farmland preservation programs. Paper presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, University of Missouri-Columbia.
6. CUBBAGE, F.W. 1997. The public interest in private forests: Developing regulations and incentives. In Creating a forestry for the 21st century: The science of ecosystem management, eds. K.A. Kohm and J.F. Franklin. Washington, DC: Island Press.
7. CUBBAGE, F.W., J. O'LAUGHLIN, and C.C. BULLOCK III. 1993. Forest resource policy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. DURHAM, D. 1995. Managing natural resources: A planning guide for Franklin County. Nashville: Contributors to the Tennessee Conservation League.
9. EGAN, A., and S. JONES. 1993. Do landowner practices reflect beliefs: Implications of an extension-research partnership. Journal of Forestry 91(10):39-45.
10. ELLEFSON, P.V. 1992. Forest resource policy: Process, participants and programs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. HEALY, R.G., and J.L. SHORT. 1981. Tax policy and rural land markets. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
12. HICKMAN, C.A. 1982. Property tax impacts of current-use assessment of forest and other rural land in Tennessee. Washingon, DC: Government Printing Office.
13. JOHNSON, K. 1994. Building forest wealth: Incentives for biodiversity, landowner profitability and value added manufacturing. Seattle: University of Washington Northwest Policy Center.
14. JONES, S.B., A.E. LULOFF, and J.C. FINLEY. 1995. Another look at NIPFs: Facing our 'myths.' Journal of Forestry 93(9):41-44.
15. LEUTHOLD, F.O., and J. CHEN. 1991. Impact of the Tennessee Greenbelt Act on property assessments and taxes. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Research Report 91-26.
16. MAETZOLD, J.A., H.K. CORDELL, J.C. BERGSTROM, and R.J. TEASLEY. 1998. Outdoor recreational use of private land and natural resource conservation: Results of the National Private Landowners Survey, 1995-96. Paper presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, University of Missouri-Columbia.
17. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC). 1998. Forested landscapes in perspective: Prospects and opportunites for sustainable management of America's nonfederal forests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. NELSON, A.C. 1992. Preserving prime farmland in the face of urbanization: Lessons from Oregon. Journal of the American Planning Association 58(4):467-88.
19. PARKS, P.J., and W.R.H. QUIMIO. 1996. Preserving agricultural land with farmland assessment: New Jersey as a case study. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25(1):22-27.
20. TAVERNIER, E.M., and F. LI. 1995. Effectiveness of use-value assessment in preserving farmland: A search-theoretical approach. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(2):626-35.