Teaching product design to non-engineers: A review of experience, opportunities and problems

Technovation

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1287-1293

  Okudan, Gül E ^a   Zappe, Sarah E ^b  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design learning; Product design

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS;

DESIGN LEARNING; MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT; TEACHING PRODUCT DESIGN;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 33750902552     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. ABET, 2002. http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/E1%200304%20EAC%20Criteria% 2011-15-02.pdf, accessed on April 10, 2003.
2. ASEE. 2004. Report of American Society for Engineering Education. Engineering in the K-12 Classroom: An Analysis of Current Practices and Guidelines for the Future (http://www.engineeringk12.org).
3. Boujut J.F., and Laureillard P. A co-operation framework for product-process integration in engineering design. Design Studies 23 (2002) 497-513
4. Bucciarelli, L.L., 1998. Learning by design-what have we learned? In: Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2666.
5. Crismond D. Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate- and redesign tasks: a study of naïve, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 7 (2001) 791-820
6. Davis, D.C., Calkins, D.E., Gentili, K.L., Trevisan, M.S., 1999. Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education-Final Report. http://www.tidee.cea.wsu.edu
7. Dym C., and Litte P. Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction (2004), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
8. Dym C., Agogino A.M., Eris O., Frey D.D., and Leifer L.J. Engineering design thinking, teaching and learning. Journal of Engineering Education (2005) 103-120
9. Flint D.J. Compressing new product success-to-success cycle time: deep customer value understanding and idea generation. Industrial Marketing Management 31 (2002) 305-315
10. Gupta A.K., and Wilemon D.L. Accelerating the development of technology-based products. California Management Review 32 2 (1990) 24-44
11. Lynn G., and Akgün A.E. Innovation strategies under uncertainty: a contingency approach for new product development. Engineering Management Journal 10 3 (1998) 8-37
12. Maidique M.A., and Zirger B.J. A study of success and failure in product innvation: the case of the US Electronics Industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM31 4 (1984) 192-203
13. McDonough III E.F., and Barczak G. The effects of cognitive problem solving orientation and technological familiarity on faster new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9 1 (1992) 44-52
14. McMasters J.H. Influencing engineering education: one industry perspective (Aerospace). International Journal of Engineering Education 20 3 (2004) 353-371
15. NAE, 2004. Report of National academy of Engineering, "Assessing the Capacity of the US Engineering Research Enterprise" http://www.nae.edu/nae/engecocom.nsf/weblinks/MKEZ-68HQMA?OpenDocument
16. Ogot M., and Okudan-Kremer G. Engineering Design: A Practical Guide (2004), Trafford Publishers, New Brunswick, BC
17. Okudan, G.E., Medeiros, D.J., 2005. Facilitating Collaborative Design: A Review on Design Representations and Workstations, DETC-85124, ASME Design Automation Conference, September 24-28, 2005, Long Beach, CA.
18. Pahl, G., 1997. How and Why Collaboration with Cognitive Psychologists Began. In: Designers: The Key to Successful Product Development, Darmstadt Symposium, Darmstadt, Germany.
19. QMM, 2005. http://www.smeal.psu.edu/qmm/index.html, viewed on March 9th, 2005.
20. Trevisan M.S., Davis D.C., Crain R.W., Calkins D.E., and Gentili K.L. Develooping and assessing statewide competencies for engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education 87 2 (1998) 185-193
21. Todd R.H., and Magleby S.P. Evaluation and rewards for faculty involved in engineering design education. International Journal of Engineering Education 20 3 (2004) 333-340
22. Walsh W. Get the whole organization behind the new product development. Research Technology Management 33 6 (1990) 32-36