Methods for empirical game-theoretic analysis (extended abstract)

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1552-1556

  Wellman, Michael P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAME THEORY; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EMPIRICAL GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC REASONING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33750723418     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Arunachalam, R., and Sadeh, N. M. 2005. The supply chain trading agent competition. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 4:63-81.
2. Eriksson, J.; Finne, N.; and Janson, S. 2006. Evolution of a supply chain management game for the trading agent competition. AI Communications 19:1-12.
3. Gal, Y., and Pfeffer, A. 2004. Reasoning about rationality and beliefs. In Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 774-781.
4. Gilpin, A., and Sandholm, T. 2006. Finding equilibria in large sequential games of imperfect information. In Seventh ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce.
5. Kearns, M.; Littman, M. L.; and Singh, S. 2001. Graphical models for game theory. In Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 253-260.
6. Kiekintveld, C.; Wellman, M. P.; and Singh, S. 2006. Empirical game-theoretic analysis of chaturanga. In AAMAS-06 Workshop on Game-Theoretic and Decision-Theoretic Agents.
7. Koller, D., and Milch, B. 2003. Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. Games and Economic Behavior 45:181-221.
8. L'Ecuyer, P. 1994. Efficiency improvement and variance reduction. In Twenty-Sixth Winter Simulation Conference, 122-132.
9. Leyton-Brown, K., and Tennenholtz, M. 2003. Local-effect games. In Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 772-780.
10. Milgrom, P. 2000. Putting auction theory to work: The simultaneous ascending auction. Journal of Political Economy 108:245-272.
11. Osepayshvili, A.; Wellman, M. P.; Reeves, D. M.; and MacKie-Mason, J. K. 2005. Self-confirming price prediction for bidding in simultaneous ascending auctions. In Twenty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 441-449.
12. Porter, R.; Nudelman, E.; and Shoham, Y. 2004. Simple search methods for finding a Nash equilibrium. In Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 664-669.
13. Reeves, D.M. 2005. Generating Trading Agent Strategies: Analytic and Empirical Methods for Infinite and Large Games. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.
14. Vorobeychik, Y.; Kiekintveld, C.; and Wellman, M. P. 2006. Empirical mechanism design: Methods, with application to a supply chain scenario. In Seventh ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce.
15. Vorobeychik, Y.; Wellman, M. P.; and Singh, S. 2005. Learning payoff functions in infinite games. In Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 977-982.
16. Walsh, W. E.; Parkes, D.; and Das, R. 2003. Choosing samples to compute heuristic-strategy Nash equilibrium. In AAMAS-03 Workshop on Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce.
17. Wellman, M. P.; Estelle, J.; Singh, S.; Vorobeychik, Y.; Kiekintveld, C.; and Soni, V. 2005a. Strategic interactions in a supply chain game. Computational Intelligence 21:1-26.
18. Wellman, M. P.; Reeves, D. M.; Lochner, K. M.; Cheng, S.-F.; and Suri, R. 2005b. Approximate strategic reasoning through hierarchical reduction of large symmetric games. In Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 502-508.
19. Wellman, M. P.; Reeves, D. M.; Lochner, K. M.; and Suri, R. 2005c. Searching for Walverine 2005. In IJCAI-05 Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis.
20. Wellman, M. P.; Jordan, P. R.; Kiekintveld, C.; Miller, J.; and Reeves, D. M. 2006. Empirical game-theoretic analysis of the TAC market games. In AAMAS-06 Workshop on Game-Theoretic and Decision-Theoretic Agents.