Sustainability: Planning's saving grace or road to perdition?

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 208-221

  Gunder, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Ideology; Injustice; Legitimacy; Regulation; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

IDEOLOGY; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 33750716483     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X06289359     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Agyeman, J., and B. Evans. 2003. Towards just sustainability in urban communities: Building equity rights with sustainable solutions. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 590 (1): 35-53.
2. Agyeman, J., and B. Evans. 2004. "Just sustainability": The emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain ? The Geographical Journal 170 (2): 155-164.
3. Allmendinger, P. 2001. Planning in Postmodern Times. London: Routledge.
4. Allmendinger, P., and M. Gunder. 2005. Applying Lacanian insight and a dash of Deridean deconstruction to planning's "dark side." Planning Theory 4 (1): 87-112.
5. Barry, J., and M. Paterson. 2004. Globalisation, ecological modernisation and new labour. Political Studies 52 (4): 767-784.
6. Batey, P. 2003. Introductory note: The planning education commission report. Town Planning Review 74 (3): 331-332.
7. Baum, H. 1997. Teaching practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17 (1): 21-29.
8. Bauriedl, S., and M. Wissen. 2002. Post-Fordist transformation, the sustainability concept and social relations with nature: A case study of the Hamburg region. Journal of Environmental Policy Planning 4 (2): 107-121.
9. Beatley, T., and K. Manning. 1997. The ecology of place. Washington, DC: Island Press.
10. Beauregard, R. 1989. Between modernity and postmodernity: The ambiguous position of US planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 7 (3): 381-395.
11. Beauregard, R. 1991. Without a net: Modernist planning and the post-modern abyss. Journal of Planning Education and Research 10 (3): 189-194.
12. Beauregard, R. 2005. Introduction: Institutional transformations. Planning Theory 4 (3): 203-207.
13. Beck, U. 1998. Democracy without enemies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
14. Berke, P. 2002. Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature 17 (1): 21-36.
15. Bracher, M. 1999. The writing cure. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
16. Breheny, M. 1995. The compact city and transport energy consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20 (2): 81-101.
17. Briassoulis, H. 1999. Who plans whose sustainability? Alternative roles for planners. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42 (6): 889-902.
18. Bunce, E. 2004. The emergence of 'smart growth' intensification in Toronto: Environment and economy in the new official plan. Local Environment 9 (2): 177-191.
19. Burton, E. 2000. The compact city: Just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Studies 37 (11): 1969-2001.
20. Butler, R. 2005. Slavoj Zizek: Living theory. London: Continuum.
21. Byrne, J., and Glover, L. 2002. A common future or towards a future commons: Globalization and sustainable development since UNCED. International Review for Environmental Strategies 3 (1): 5-25.
22. Cardew, R. 1999. Two cultures, common purpose. Australian Planner 36 (3): 134-141.
23. Cochrane, A. 2000. The social construction of urban policy. In A companion to the city, edited by G. Bridge and S. Watson, 531-542. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Dalton, L. 2001. Weaving the fabric of planning as education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20 (4): 423-436.
25. Davoudi, S. 2000. Sustainability: A new vision for the British planning system. Planning Perspectives 15 (2): 123-137.
26. Davoudi, S. 2001. Planning and the twin discourses of sustainability. In Planning for a sustainable future, edited by A. Layard, S. Davoud, and S. Batty, 81-99. London: Spon.
27. Dear, M. 1986. Postmodernism and planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4 (3): 367-384.
28. Department of Sustainability and Environment. 2005. Retrieved 24 June 2005 from www.dse.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030online/content/ implementation_plans/07b_action6.html.
29. De Roo, G., and D. Miller. 2000. Compact cities and sustainable urban development: A critical assessment of policies and plans from an international perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
30. de Soysa, I. 2002. Ecoviolence: Shrinking pie, or honey pot ? Global Environmental Politics 2 (4): 1-34.
31. Dixon, J. 2001. Trends and prospects for planning education in New Zealand. Paper presented at the First World Planning Schools Congress, 11-15 July, Shanghai, China.
32. Dixon, J., and Dupuis A. 2003. Urban intensification in Auckland, New Zealand: A challenge for new urbanism. Housing Studies 18 (3): 353-368.
33. Doak, J., and Parker, G. 2005. Network space? The challenge of meaningful participation and the new spatial planning in England. Planning, Practice & Research 20 (1): 23-40.
34. Donnison, N. 2005. Bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality: Making sustainability happen in Melbourne. Creative & sustainable communities: Planning Institute of Australia 2005 National Congress program and abstracts, 17-20 April, Melbourne, Australia.
35. Doyle, T. 1998. Sustainable development and Agenda 21: The secular bible of global free markets and pluralist democracy. Third World Quarterly 19 (4): 771-786.
36. Dyllick, T., and Hockerts, K. 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11 (2): 130-141.
37. Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
38. Foster, J. 2001. Education as sustainability. Environmental Education Research 7 (2): 153-165.
39. Freeman, C. 2005. Is sustainability an appropriate focus for planning education ? A discussion paper. ANZAPS/GPEAN 2005-Planning education & sustainability: Sustaining Planning Education conference proceedings. 30 September-2 October, Adelaide, University of South Australia, pp. 106-117.
40. Frey, H. 1999. Designing the city: Towards a more sustainable form. London: Spon.
41. Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the public domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42. Friedmann, J. 1996. The core curriculum in planning revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research 15 (1): 89-104.
43. Gilbert, L. 2004. At the core and on the edge: Justice discourses in metropolitan Toronto. Space and Polity 8 (2): 245-260.
44. Glavovic, B. 2003. Educating planners of the future. Planning Quarterly 151: 24-28.
45. Gleeson, B. 2001. Devolution and state planning in Australia. International Planning Studies 6 (2): 133-152.
46. Gleeson, B., T. Darbas, and S. Lawson. 2004. Governance, sustainability and recent Australian metropolitan strategies: A socio-theoretic analysis. Urban Policy and Research 22 (4): 245-366.
47. Gunder, M. 2003a. Passionate planning for the others' desire: An agonistic response to the dark side of planning. Progress in Planning 60 (3): 235-319.
48. Gunder, M. 2003b. Planning policy formulation from a Lacanian perspective. International Planning Studies 8 (4): 279-294.
49. Gunder, M. 2004. Shaping the planner's ego-ideal: A Lacanian interpretation of planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 (3): 299-311.
50. Gunder, M. 2005a. The production of desirous space: Mere fantasies of the utopian city ? Planning Theory 4 (2): 173-199.
51. Gunder, M. 2005b. Lacan, planning and urban policy formation. Urban Policy and Research 23 (1): 91-111.
52. Gunder, M., and T. Fookes. 1997a. Planning school programs in Australia and New Zealand: A comparison of accredited programs. Australian Planner 34 (1): 54-61.
53. Gunder, M., and T. Fookes. 1997b. In defence of planning praxis, knowledge and the profession: Planning education and institutions for the new century. Planning Practice and Research 12 (2): 133-146.
54. Gunder, M., and J. Hillier. 2004. Conforming to the expectations of the profession: A Lacanian perspective on planning practice, norms and values. Planning Theory and Practice 5 (2): 217-235.
55. Gunder, M., and J. Hillier. 2006. Planning as urban therapeutic. Environment and Planning: A, in press.
56. Hall, P. 2001. Sustainable cities or town cramming ? In Planning for a sustainable future, edited by A. Layard, S. Davoudi, and S. Batty, 101-114. London: Spon.
57. Haughton, G. 1999. Environmental justice and the sustainable city. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18 (3): 233-243.
58. Haughton, G., and D. Counsell. 2004. Regions and sustainable development: Regional planning matters. The Geographical Journal 170 (2): 135-145.
59. Healey, P., and T. Shaw. 1994. Changing meanings of "environment" in the British planning system. Transactions of the Institute of the British Geographers 19 (4): 425-438.
60. Hillier, J. 2002. Shadows of power. London: Routledge.
61. Hillier, J. 2003. Agonizing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be "real." Planning Theory 2 (1): 37-59.
62. Howes, H. 2004. An environment for prosperity and quality living accommodating growth in the Thames Valley. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11 (1): 35-47.
63. Jacobs, M. 1991. The green economy. London: Pluto.
64. Jepson, J. 2001. Sustainability and planning: Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of Planning Literature 15 (4): 499-510.
65. Jessop, B. 2000. The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (2): 323-360.
66. Keil, R., and J-A. Boudreau. 2005. Is there regionalism after municipal amalgamation in Toronto ? City 9 (1): 9-22.
67. Kipfer, S., and R. Keil. 2002. Toronto Inc? Planning the competitive city in the new Toronto. Antipode 34 (2): 227-264.
68. Lacan, J. 2004. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII. Manuscript translation by Russell Grigg (photocopy from translator).
69. Laclau, E. 1989. Preference. In The sublime object of ideology, by S. Zizek, ix - xv. London: Verso.
70. Lefebvre, H. 2003. The urban revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
71. Levy, J. 1992. What has happened to planning ? Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (1): 81-84.
72. Lucas, K., and S. Fuller. 2005. Putting the "E" into LSPs: Representing the environment within local strategic partnerships (LSPs) in the UK. Local Economy 10 (5): 461-475.
73. Marcuse, P. 1998. Sustainability is not enough. Environment and Urbanization 10 (2): 103-111.
74. Marcuse, P. 2000. Cities in quarters. In A Companion to the city, edited by G. Bridge and S. Watson, 270-281. Oxford: Blackwell.
75. Markusen, A. 2003. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 37 (6/7): 701-717.
76. McGowan, T. 2004. The end of dissatisfaction? Albany: SUNY.
77. McGuirk, P. 2004. State, strategy, and scale in the competitive city: A neo-Gramscian analysis of the governance of "global Sydney." Environment and Planning A 36 (6): 1019-1043.
78. McGuirk, P. 2005. Neoliberalist planning? Re-thinking and re-casting Sydney's metropolitan planning. Geographical Research 43 (1): 59-70.
79. Mees, P. 2003. Paterson's curse: The attempt to revise metropolitan planning in Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research 21 (3): 287-299.
80. Murdoch, J. 2004. Putting planning in its place: Planning, sustainability and the urban capacity study. Area 36 (1): 50-58.
81. Murdoch, J., and S. Abram. 2002. Rationalities of planning. Aldershot: Ashgate.
82. Neuman, M. 2005. The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 (1): 11-26.
83. Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. 1989. Cities and automobile dependency. Aldershot: Gower Technical.
84. O'Connor, K. 2003. Melbourne 2030: A response. Urban Policy and Research 21 (2): 211-215.
85. Orr, D. 1992. Earth in mind. Washington, DC: Island Press.
86. Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipodes 34 (3): 380-404.
87. Raco, M. 2005a. A step change or a step back? The Thames gateway and the re-birth of the urban development corporations. Local Economy 20 (2): 141-153.
88. Raco, M. 2005b. Sustainable development, rolled-out neoliberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode 37 (2): 324-347.
89. Ratner, B. 2004. "Sustainability" as a dialogue of values: Challenges to the sociology of development. Sociological Inquiry 74 (1): 50-69.
90. Rees, W. 1995. Achieving sustainability: Reform or transformation ? Journal of Planning Literature 9 (4): 343-361.
91. Rees, W. 2002. Globalization and sustainability: Conflict or convergence ? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 22 (4): 249-268.
92. Rees, W. 2003. Economic development and environmental protection: An ecological economics perspective. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 86 (1): 29-45.
93. Richardson, T. 2002. Freedom and control in planning: Using discourse in the pursuit of reflexive practice. Planning Theory & Practice 3 (3): 353-361.
94. Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). 2001. New vision for planning. London: RTPI.
95. Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). 2003. Education commission report. London: RTPI.
96. Safouan, M. 2004. Four lessons of psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.
97. Sandercock, L. 1997. The planner tamed: Preparing planners for the twenty-first century. Australian Planner 34 (2): 90-95.
98. Sanyal, B. 2005. Strategizing to overcome institutional resistance to planning in developing countries. Planning Theory 4 (3): 225-246.
99. Stavrakakis, Y. 1999. Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.
100. Swearingen White, S., and J. Mayo. 2004. Learning expectations in environmental planning: Predictions and interpretations. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (1): 78-88.
101. Thomas, I., and J. Nicita. 2002. Sustainability education and Australian universities. Environmental Education Research 8 (4): 475-492.
102. Troy, P. 1996. The perils of urban consolidation. Sydney: Federation Press.
103. Troy, P. 2000. Urban planning in the late twentieth century. In A companion to the city, edited by G. Bridge and S. Watson, 543-554. Oxford: Blackwell.
104. Turok, I. 2004. Cities, regions and competitiveness. Regional Studies 38 (9): 1069-1083.
105. Verhaeghe, P. 2001. Beyond gender. New York: Other Press.
106. Washington, R., and D. Strong. 1997. A model for teaching environmental justice in a planning curriculum. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 (3): 280-290.
107. Wheeler, S. 2000. Planning for metropolitan sustainability. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20 (2): 133-145.
108. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
109. Zizek, S. 1989. The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
110. Zizek, S. 1993. Tarrying with the negative. Durham: Duke University Press.
111. Zizek, S. 1997. The plague of fantasies. London: Verso.
112. Zizek, S. 2002. The real of sexual difference. In Reading seminar XX, edited by S. Barnard and B. Fink, 57-75. Albany: SUNY.