Shaping the planner's ego-ideal: A Lacanian interpretation of planning education

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 299-311

  Gunder, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Education; Ideology; Lacan; Planning; Sociology of knowledge

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; IDEOLOGY; PUBLIC GOODS; SUSTAINABILITY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 2942579907     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X03261284     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Afshar, F., and K. Pezzoli. 2001. Integrating globalization and planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20:277-80.
2. Alcorn, M. 1994. The subject of discourse: Reading Lacan through (and beyond) poststructuralist contexts. In Lacanian theory of discourse, edited by M. Bracher, M. Alcorn, R. Corthell, and F. Massardier-Kenney, 19-45. New York: New York University Press.
3. Alexander, E. 1984. After rationality, what? Journal of the American Planning Association 50 (1): 62-69.
4. _. 2000. Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19:242-56.
5. _. 2002. The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation. Planning Theory 1 (3): 226-49.
6. Allmendinger, P. 2002. Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning Theory 1 (1): 77-99.
7. Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 2002. Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
8. Baum, H. 1989. Organizational politics against organizational culture: A psychoanalytic perspective. Human Resource Management 28:191-206.
9. _. 1991a. Creating a family in the workplace. Human Relations 44:1137-59.
10. _. 1991b. How bureaucracy discourages responsibility. In Organizations on the couch, edited by M. Kets de Vries et al., 264-85. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. _. 1994. Community and consensus: Reality and fantasy in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 13:251-62.
12. _. 1997. Teaching practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17:21-29.
13. _. 2000. Fantasies and realities in university-community partnerships. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20:234-46.
14. Bendor, J. 1995. A model of muddling through. American Political Science Review 89 (4): 819-40.
15. Boothby, R. 2001. Freud as philosopher: Metapsychology after Lacan. London: Routledge.
16. Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
17. Boyer, M. 1983. Dreaming the rational city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Bracher, M. 1993. Lacan, discourse, and social change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. _. 1994. On the psychological and social functions of language: Lacan's theory of the four discourses. In Lacanian theory of discourse, edited by M. Bracher, M. Alcorn, R. Corthell, and F. Massardier-Kenney, 107-37. New York: New York University Press.
20. _. 1999. The writing cure. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
21. _. 2000. How analysis cures according to Lacan. In The subject of Lacan, edited by K. Malone and S. Friedlander, 189-208. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22. Butler, J. 1997a. Excitable, speech: A politics of the performative. London: Routledge.
23. _. 1997b. The psychic life of power. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Campbell, H., and R. Marshall. 2002. Utilitarianism's bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory 1 (2): 163-87.
25. Castells, M. 2000. The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26. Caudill, D. 2000. Lacan's social psychoanalysis. In The subject of Lacan, edited by K. Malone and S. Friedlander, 297-315. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27. Dalton, L. 2001. Weaving the fabric of planning as education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20:423-36.
28. Daly, H. 1998. Sustainable growth: An impossibility theorem. In Debating the earth, edited by J. Dryzek, 285-89. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29. Dean, T. 2000. Beyond sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Duany, A., and E. Plater-Zyberk. 1996. Neighborhoods and suburbs. Design Quarterly 164:10-23.
31. Fink, B. 2002. Knowledge and Jouissance. In Reading Seminar XX, edited by S. Barnard and B. Fink, 21-46. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32. Fink, B. 1995. The Lacanian subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. _. 1998. The master signifier and the four discourses. In Key concepts of Lacanian psychoanalysis, edited by D. Nobus, 29-47. New York: Other Press.
34. Foucault, M. 1998. On the ways of writing history. In Aesthetics, method, and epistemology, edited by J. Faubion, 279-95. London: Penguin.
35. Friedmann, J. 1973. Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. New York: Anchor.
36. _. 1987. Planning in the public domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. _. 1996. The core curriculum in planning revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research 15:89-104.
38. _. 2002. The prospect of cities. London: University of Minnesota Press.
39. Gunder, M. 2002. Bridging theory and practice in planning education: A story from New Zealand. Australian Planner 39 (4): 200-204.
40. _. 2003. Passionate planning for the others' desire: An agonistic response to the dark side of planning. Progress in Planning 60 (3): 235-322.
41. Harvey, D. 1973. Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.
42. _. 1996. Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative planning. London: Macmillan.
44. Hillier, J. 2002. Shadows of power. London: Routledge.
45. _. 2003. Agon'ising over consensus - Why Habermasian ideals cannot be "real." Planning Theory 2 (1): 37-59.
46. Hillier, J., and M. Gunder. 2003. Planning fantasies? An exploration of a potential Lacanian framework for understanding development assessment planning. Planning Theory 2 (3): 225-48.
47. Hudson, B. 1979. Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions. American Planning Association Journal 45 (4): 387-98.
48. Innes, J. 1997. The planner's century. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16:227-28.
49. Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
50. Lacan, J. 1977. Ecrits. London: Norton.
51. _. 1988a. The seminar, book I, 1953-1954. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. _. 1988b. The seminar, book II, 1954-1955. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. _. 1991. Seminar XVII, L'envers de la psychanalyse, 1969-1970. Paris: Seuil.
54. _. 1992. The ethics of psychoanalysis 1959-1960. London: Routledge.
55. _. 1998. The seminar, book XX, 1972-1973. New York: Norton.
56. Laclau, E. 1989. Preference. In The sublime object of ideology, by S. Zizek, ix-xv. London: Verso.
57. _. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
58. _. 2002. Democracy and the question of power. In Habitus: A sense of place, edited by J. Hillier and E. Rooksby, 37-50. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
59. Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
60. Leys, C. 1996. The rise and fall of development theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
61. Low, N. 1994. Planning and justice. In Values and planning, edited by H. Thomas, 117-39. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
62. Marini, M. 1992. Jacques Lacan. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
63. McLoughlin, J. 1994. Centre or periphery? Town planning and spatial political economy. Environment and Planning A 26:1111-22.
64. Mouffe, C. 1993. The return of the political London: Verso.
65. _. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
66. Myers, D. 2001. Putting the future in planning: Introduction. Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (4): 365-67.
67. Myers, D., C. Contant, B. Ferguson, D. Howe, J. Kaufman, and S. White. 1997. Anchor points for planning's identification. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 (3): 223-24.
68. Nobus, D. 2000. Jacques Lacan and the Freudian practice of psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
69. Ozawa, C., and E. Seltzer. 1999. Taking our bearings: Mapping a relationship among planning practice, theory, and education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18:257-66.
70. Pile, S. 1996. The body and the city. London: Routledge.
71. _. 1998. Freud, dreams and imaginative geographies. In Freud 2000, edited by A. Elliott, 204-34. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
72. Ragland, E. 1996. The discourse of the master. In Lacan, politics, aesthetics, edited by W. Apollon and R. Feldstein, 127-47. Albany: State University of New York Press.
73. Ragland-Sullivan, E. 1991. Stealing material. In Lacan & the human sciences, edited by A. Leupin, 59-105. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
74. Reade, E. 1987. British town and country planning. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
75. Richardson, T. 2002. Freedom and control in planning: Using discourse in the pursuit of reflexive practice. Planning Theory & Practice 3, (3): 353-61.
76. Sager, T. 1994. Communicative planning theory. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
77. Salecl, R. 1994. Deference to the great other: Discourse of education. In Lacanian theory of discourse, edited by M. Bracher, M. Alcorn, R. Corthell, and F. Massardier-Kenney, 163-75. New York: New York University Press.
78. Sandercock, L. 1997. The planner tamed: Preparing planners for the twenty first century. Australian Planner 34 (2): 90-95.
79. _. 1998. Towards cosmopolis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
80. _. 1999. A portrait of postmodern planning: Anti-hero and/or passionate pilgrim? Plan Canada 39 (2): 12-15.
81. Sanyal, B. 2002. Globalization, ethical compromise and planning theory. Planning Theory 1 (2): 116-23.
82. Seltzer, E., and C. Ozawa. 2002. Clear signals: Moving on to planning's promise. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22:77-86.
83. Stavrakakis, Y. 1999. Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.
84. Stiftel, B. 1999. Faculty labor and intellectual capital: Furthering disciplinary development and institutional positioning in the Urban Planning Academy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19:207-10.
85. Sturrock, J. 2003. Structuralism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
86. Tajbakhsh, K. 2001. The promise of the city. Berkeley: University of California Press.
87. Thrift, N. 2000a. Entanglements of power: Shadows? In Entanglements of power, edited by J. Sharp, P. Routledge, C. Philo, and R. Paddison, 269-78. London: Routledge.
88. _. 2000b. With child to see any strange thing: Everyday life in the city. In A companion to the city, edited by G. Bridge and S. Watson, 398-409. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
89. Van Haute, P. 2002. Against adaptation. New York: Other Press.
90. Verhaeghe, P. 2001. Beyond gender. New York: Other Press.
91. Weitz, J. 2001. Growing smart: Coming to a classroom near you? Journal of Planning Education and Research 21:84-91.
92. Wheeler, S. 2000. Planning for metropolitan sustainability. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20:133-45.
93. Wildavsky, A. 1973. If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing. Policy Sciences 4 (2): 127-53.
94. Yiftachel, O. 1989. Towards a new typology of urban planning theories. Environment and Planning B 16:23-39.
95. Zizek, S. 1989. The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
96. _. 1992. Looking awry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. _. 1993. Tarrying with the negative. London: Duke University Press.
98. _. 1997. The abyss of freedom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
99. _. 1998. Four discourses, four subjects. In Cognito and the unconscious, edited by S. Zizek, 74-113. London: Duke University Press.
100. _. 2001. Did somebody say totalitarianism? London: Verso.
101. _. 2002a. For they know not what they do. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
102. _. 2002b. The real of sexual difference. In Reading Seminar XX, edited by S. Barnard and B. Fink, 57-75. Albany: State University of New York Press.