Learning expectations in environmental planning: Predictions and interpretations

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 78-88

  White, Stacey Swearingen ^a   Mayo, James M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental planning; Planning education; Planning pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; LEARNING;

EID: 23744485916     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X04267712     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alexander, Ernest R. 2001. What do planners need to know? Journal of Planning Education and Research 20 (3): 376-380.
2. Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. 1984. Guide to graduate education in urban and regional planning. 4th ed. n.p.: Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning.
3. Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. 2000. Guide to undergraduate and graduate education in urban and regional planning. 11th ed. Atlanta, GA: Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning/City Planning Program, Georgia Institute of Technology.
4. Baum, Howell S. 1997. Social science, social work, and surgery: Teaching what students need to practice planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (2): 179 - 188.
5. Braddock, R. D., J. Fien, and R. Rickson. 1994. Environmental studies: Managing the disciplinary divide. The Environmentalist 14: 35 - 46.
6. Briassoulis, Helen. 1989. Theoretical orientations in environmental planning: An inquiry into alternative approaches. Environmental Management 13 (4): 381 - 392.
7. Carter, Emanuel J., Jr. 1992. Toward a core body of knowledge: A new curriculum for city and regional planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research 12 (2): 160 - 163.
8. Daily, G. C., ed. 1997. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
9. Deknatel, Charles Y. 1984. Choices of orientation in teaching environmental planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 3 (2): 118 - 125.
10. Ehrlich, Paul R., and Anne H. Ehrlich. 1996. Betrayal of science and reason. Washington, DC: Island Press.
11. Fischer, Claude S. 1975. Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology 80 (6): 1319 - 1341.
12. Fischer, Claude S. 1995. The subcultural theory of urbanism: A twentieth-year assessment. American Journal of Sociology 101 (3): 543 - 577.
13. Friedmann, John. 1996. The core curriculum in planning revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research 15 (2): 89 - 104.
14. Godschalk, David R. 1971. Editor's introduction. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 37 (4): 210.
15. Gottlieb, Robert. 1993. Forcing the spring: The transformation of the American environmental movement. Washington, DC: Island Press.
16. Jickling, Bob. 1994. Why I don't want my children to be educated for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Education 23 (4): 5 - 8.
17. Marsh, William M. 1998. Landscape planning: Environmental applications. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley.
18. Martin, Evelyn, and Timothy Beatley. 1993. Our relationship with the earth: Environmental ethics in planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 12 (2): 117 - 126.
19. McHarg, Ian. 1969. Design with nature. New York: Natural History Press.
20. Moseley, Christine. 2000. Teaching for environmental literacy. The Clearing House 74 (1): 23 - 24.
21. Munson, B. H. 1994. Ecological misconceptions. Journal of Environmental Education 25 (4): 30 - 34.
22. Orr, David W. 1992. Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Ortolano, Leonard. 1997. Environmental regulation and impact assessment. New York: Wiley.
24. Ortolano, Leonard. 2000. U.S. urban environmental planning. In The profession of city planning: Changes, images and challenges 1950-2000, ed. Lloyd Rodwin and Bishwapriya Sanyal, 144 - 160. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
25. Ozawa, Connie, and Ethan P. Seltzer. 1999. Taking our bearings: Mapping a relationship among planning practice, theory, and education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18 (3): 257 - 266.
26. Perloff, Harvey S. 1957. Education for planning: City, state and regional. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Planning Accreditation Board. 2001. The accreditation document: Criteria and procedures of the planning accreditation board. May. http://showcase.netins.net/web/pab_fi66/accredoc.may01.pdf (accessed February 3, 2004).
28. Schoenfeld, Clay, and John Disinger, eds. 1978. Environmental education in action - II: Case studies of environmental studies programs in colleges and universities today. Columbus: The Ohio State University/ ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
29. Seltzer, Ethan, and Connie P. Ozawa. 2002. Clear signals: Moving on to planning's promise. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (1): 77 - 86.
30. Soule, Michael E., and Daniel Press. 1998. What is environmental studies? BioScience 48 (5): 397 - 405.
31. Susskind, Lawrence. 2000. Environmental planning: The changing demands of effective practice. In The profession of city planning: Changes, images and challenges 1950-2000, ed. Lloyd Rodwin and Bishwapriya Sanyal, 161 - 173. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
32. Thayer, Robert L., Jr. 2003. LifePlace: Bioregional thought and practice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33. Washington, R. O., and Denise Strong. 1997. A model for teaching environmental justice in a planning curriculum. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 (4): 280-290.