The impact of need for cognition on interpersonal influence;El efecto de la necesidad de cognitión sobre la influencia interpersonal

Psicothema

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 645-650

  Briñol, Pablo ^a   Becerra, Alberto ^a   Díaz, Darío ^a   Valle, Carmen ^a   Horcajo, Javir ^a   Gallardo, Ismael ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750581923     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alvaro, E. M. y Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counter-argumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
2. Bazerman, M. H. y Neale, M. A. (1992). Negotiating rationally. Nueva York: Free Press.
3. Berzonsky, M. D. y Sullivan, C. (1992). Social-cognitive aspects of identity style: need for cognition, experiential openness and introspection. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 140-155.
4. Briñol, P., De la Corte, L. y Becerra, A. (2001). Qué es persuasión. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
5. Brifiol, P., Horcajo, J., Becerra, A., Falces, C. y Sierra, B. (2002). Cambio de actitudes implícitas. Psicothema, 14, 771-775.
6. Briñol, P., Horcajo, J., Becerra, A., Falces, C. y Sierra, B. (2003). Equilibrio cognitivo implícito. Psicothema, 15, 395-280.
7. Briñol, P. y Petty, R. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: a self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1.123-1.139.
8. Briñol, P. y Petty, R. E. (2004). Self-validation processes: the role of thought confidence in persuasion. En G. Haddock y G. Maio (eds.): Theoretical perspectives on attitudes for the 21st century (pp. 205-226). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
9. Briñol, P. y Petty, R. E. (2005). Individual differences in persuasion. En D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson y M. P. Zanna (eds.): The handbook of attitudes and attitude change (pp. 575-616). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E. y Tormala, Z. L. (2004). The self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 559-573.
11. Brodbeck, F. (1996). Criteria in the study of work group functioning. En M. A. West (ed.): Handbook of work group psychology, pp. 285-315. Chichester: Willey.
12. Cacioppo, J. T. y Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
13. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. y Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of «need for cognition». Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
14. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. y Rodríguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: an individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1.032-1.043.
15. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A. y Jarvis. W. B. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
16. Chaiken, S. y Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press, Nueva York.
17. Cohen, J. y Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L. y Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346-365.
19. Falces, C., Briñol, P.," Sierra, B., Becerra, A. y Alier, E. (2001). Validación de la escala de necesidad de cognición y aplicación al estudio del cambio de actitudes. Psicothema, 13, 647-653.
20. Forrest, J.A. y Feldman, R.S. (2000). Detecting deception and Judge's involvement: lower task involvement leads to better lie detection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 118-125.
21. Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E. y Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25, 117-142.
22. Leary, M., Sheppard, J. A., McNeil, M. S., Jenkis, T. B. y Barnes, B. D. (1986). Objectivism in information utilization; theory and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 32-43.
23. Miller, M. L., Omens, R. S. y Delvadia, R. (1991). Dimensions of social competente: personality and coping style correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 955-964.
24. Morgan, P. y Tindale, R. S. (2002). Group vs. individual performance in mixed-motive situations: exploring an inconsistency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 44-65.
25. Osberg, T. (1987). The convergent and discriminant validity of the need for cognition scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 441-450.
26. Pérez, J. A. y Mugny, C. (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: when being an outgroup is an advance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 157-169.
27. Petty, R. E. (2001). Subtle influences on judgments and behaviors: who is most susceptible? En J. Forgas y K. D. Williams (eds.): Social influence: direct and indirect processes (pp. 129-146). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
28. Petty, R. E. y Briñol, P. (2002). Attitude change: the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. En G. Bartels y W. Nielissen (eds.): Marketing for Sustainability: Towards Transactional Policy Making (pp. 176-190). IOS Press.
29. Petty, R. E. y Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Petty, R. E. y Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude strength: antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M. y Brock, T. C. (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Petty, R. E. y Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: multiple roles for persuasion variables. En D. Gilbert, S. Fiske y G. Lindzey (eds.): The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 1, pp. 323-390). Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Shestowsky, D., Wegener, D. T. y Fabrigar, L. R. (1998). Need for cognition and interpersonal influence: individual differences in impact on dyadic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1.317-1.328.
34. Simon, V. M. (1997). La participatión emocional en la toma de decisiones. Psicothema, 9, 365-376.
35. Sorrentino, R. M., Bobocel, D. R., Guitta, M. Z., Olson, J. M. y Hewitt, E. C. (1988). Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: individual differences in the effects of personal relevance of social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 189-206.
36. Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E. y Briñol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: the roles of elaboration and thought-confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1.700-1.712.
37. Venkatraman, M. P., Marlino, D., Kardes, F. R. y Sklar, K. B. (1990). Effects of individual difference variables on response to factual and evaluative ads. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 761-765.
38. Webster, D. M. y Kruglansky, A. W. (1994). Need for cognition and need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1.049-1.052.