English word recognition and word integration skills of native Arabic-and Japanese-speaking learners of English as a second language

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 289-315

  Fender, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038380600     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S014271640300016X     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Abu-Rabia, S. (1997a). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers in reading paragraphs, sentences, and isolated words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 465-482.
2. Abu-Rabia, S. (1997b). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 65-78.
3. Abu-Rabia, S. (1999). The effect of Arabic vowels on the reading comprehension of second- and sixth-grade native Arab children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 93-101.
4. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Akamatsu, N. (1998). L1 and L2 reading: The orthographic effects of Japanese on reading in English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 11, 9-28.
6. Akamatsu, N. (1999). The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 381-403.
7. Altmann, G., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685-712.
8. Barker, T., Torgesen, J., & Wagner, R. (1992). The role of orthographic processing skills on five different reading tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 335-345.
9. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & D'Amico, S. (1999). Processing complex sentences: A cross-linguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 69-123.
10. Benmamoun, E. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Arabic dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Bentin, S., & Ibrahim, R. (1996). New evidence for phonological processing during visual word recognition: The case of Arabic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 309-323.
12. Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
13. Bernhardt, E. (1986). Cognitive processes in L2: An examination of reading behaviors. In J. Lantolf & A Labarca (Eds.), Research in second language learning: Focus on the classroom. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Boland, J. (1997). The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 423-484.
15. Britt, M., Perfetti, C., Garrod, S., & Rayner, K. (1992). Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 293-314.
16. Brown, A. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. Spiro & B. Bruce (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Brown, T. L., & Haynes, M. (1985). Literacy background and reading development in a second language. In T. H. Carr (Ed.), The development of reading skills. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77-126.
19. Chavez, M. (1994). English native speakers reading German: Syntactic versus semantic problems and strategic behavior. IRAL, 32, 321-332.
20. Chen, H.-C. (1992). Reading comprehension in Chinese: Some implications from character reading times. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese. Amsterdam: North-Holland Elsevier.
21. Chitri, H.-F., & Willows, D. (1997). Bilingual word recognition in English and Greek. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 139-156.
22. Chikamatsu, N. (1996). The effects of L1 orthography on L2 word recognition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 403-432.
23. Cortese, M., & Simpson, G. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? Memory and Cognition, 28, 1269-1276.
24. Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1990). Explaining failures in spoken language comprehension by children with reading disabilities. In D. Balota, G. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Crocker, M. (1994). On the nature of the principle-based sentence processor. In C. Clifton & L. Frazier (Eds.). Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Ehri, L. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Eskey, D. (1988). Holding in the bottom: An interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fender, M. (2001). A review of L1 and L2/ESL word integration skills and the nature of L2/ESL word integration development involved in lower-level text processing. Language Learning, 51, 319-396.
29. Fodor, J., Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Tasks and timing in the perception of linguistic anomaly. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 25-55.
30. Frank, R., & Vijay-Shanker, K. (2000). Lowering across languages. In M. De Vincenzi & V. Lombardo (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
31. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial view. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Frederici, A., & Frisch, S. (2000). Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument specific information. Journal of Language and Memory, 43, 476-507.
33. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in a second and native language. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119-148.
34. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
35. Garrett, M. (2000). Remarks on the architecture of language processing systems. In Y. Grodzinsky, L. Shapiro, & D. Swinney (Eds.), Language and the brain. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (1998). Incrementality in discourse understanding. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Gass, S. (1987). The resolution of conflicts among competing systems: A bidirectional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 329-350.
38. Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
39. Gibson, E., Hickok, G., & Schutze, T. (1994). Processing empty categories: A parallel approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 381-406.
40. Gough, P., & Walsh, M. (1991). Chinese, Phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher of English. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Grabe, W. (1988). Reassessing the term "interactive." In P. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Gunter, T., Friederici, A., & Schreifers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556-568.
43. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1531-1549.
44. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Hill, L. A. (1980). Intermediate anecdotes in American English. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (1996). The effect of first written language on the acquisition of English literacy. Cognition, 59, 119-147.
47. Holmes, V., Stowe, L., & Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 668-689.
48. Homeidi, M. (1994). Government and binding and case assignment in modern standard Arabic. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Papers and studies in contrastive linguistics. Poznan, Poland: Adam Mickiewicz University.
49. Hoover, M., & Dwivedi, V. (1998). Syntactic processing in skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48, 1-29.
50. Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.). Japanese sentence parsing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Juffs, A. (1998a). Main verb versus reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in L2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107-147.
53. Juffs, A. (1998b). Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language sentence processing. Second Language Research, 12, 406-424.
54. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in L2 sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh- extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483-516.
55. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 46, 283-326.
56. Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
57. Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
58. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
59. Kern, R. (1994). The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483-516.
60. Kilborn, T. (1994). Learning a language late: Second language acquisition in adults. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61. Koda, K. (1996). L2 word recognition research: A critical review. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 450-460.
62. Koda, K. (1998). The role of phonemic awareness in second language reading. Second Language Research, 14, 194-215.
63. Koda, K. (2000). Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 297-320.
64. Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 307-348.
65. Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66. Leong, C., & Tamaoka, K. (1998). Cognitive processing of Chinese characters, words, sentences and Japanese kanji and kana: An introduction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 155-164.
67. Lewellen, M. J., Goldinger, S., Pisoni, D., & Greene, B. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 316-330.
68. MacDonald, J. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395-423.
69. Mahesh, K., Eiselt, K., & Holbrook, J. (1999). Sentence processing in understanding: Interaction and integration of knowledge sources. In A. Ram & K. Moorman (Eds.), Understanding language understanding: Computational models of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Mazuka, R. (1998). The development of language processing strategies: A crosslinguistic study between Japanese and English. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1995). Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 134-157.
72. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
73. Mitchell, D. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
74. Mitchell, D., & Corley, M. (1994). Immediate biases in parsing: Discourse effects or experimental artifacts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 20, 217-222.
75. Mohammad, M. (2000). Word order, agreement and pronominalization in Standard and Palestinian Arabic. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
76. Murray, W., & Rowan, M. (1998). Early, mandatory, pragmatic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 1-22.
77. Ni, W., Fodor, J., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1998). Anomaly detection: Eye movement patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 515-544.
78. Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In R. Lyons (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
79. Olson, R., Kliegle, R., Davidson, B., & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In T. Waller (Ed.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press.
80. Paran, A. (1996). Reading in EFL: Facts and fiction. ELT Journal, 50, 25-34.
81. Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
82. Perfetti, C. (1991). Representations and awareness in the acquisition of reading competence. In L. Rieben & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. Perfetti, C., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The constituency model of word identification. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
84. Pickering, M., & Traxler, M. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 940-961.
85. Pickering, M., & Traxler, M. (2000). Parsing and incremental understanding during reading. In M. Cracker, M. Pickering, & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
87. Pinango, M. (2000). Canonicity in Broca's sentence comprehension: The case of psychological verbs. In Y. Grodzinsky, L. Shapiro, & D. Swinney (Eds.), Language and the brain. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
88. Plaut, D., McClelland, J., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
89. Pritchett, B. (1992). Grammatical competence and performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
91. Rayner, K., & Sereno, J. (1994). Eye movements in reading psycholinguistic research. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
92. Rayner, K., Sereno, S., Morris, R., Schmauder, R., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 21-49.
93. Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H., & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sound depends on knowing alphabetic spelling. Cognition, 24, 31-44.
94. Rey, A., Ziegler, J., & Jacobs, A. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75, B1-B12.
95. Richards, J. (1997). Interchanges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
96. Ryan, A. (1997). Learning the orthographical form of L2 vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
97. Ryan, A., & Meara, P. (1991). The case of the invisible vowels: Arabic speakers reading English words. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 531-540.
98. Saito, H., Masuda, H., & Kawakami, M. (1998). Form and sound similarity effects in kanji recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 323-357.
99. Schneider, W. (2000). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
100. Segalowitz, N., & Segalowitz, S. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369-385.
101. Segalowitz, N., Watson, V., & Segalowitz, S. (1995). Vocabulary skill: A single-case assessment of automaticity of word recognition in a timed lexical decision task. Second Language Research, 11, 121-136.
102. Seidenberg, M. (1992). Beyond orthographic depth in reading: Equitable division of labor. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
103. Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
104. Sereno, J. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 459-477.
105. Seymour, P. (1997). Foundations of orthographic development. In C. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.). Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
106. Stanovich, K. (1991). Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1). New York: Longman.
107. Stanovich, K., & West, R. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433.
108. Stoller, F. (1986). Reading lab: Developing low-level reading skills. In F. Dubin, D. Eskey, & W. Grabe (Eds.), Teaching second language reading for academic purposes. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
109. Trueswell, J., & Kim, A. (1998). How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: Fast priming of verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 102-139.
110. Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
111. Tzeng, O., & Wang, W. (1983). The first two R's: The way different languages reduce speech to script affects how visual information is processed in the brain. American Scientist, 71, 238-243.
112. van Berkum, J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657-671.
113. Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Tanzman, M. (1994). Components of reading ability. In G. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
114. Wade-Woolley, L. (1999). First language influences on second language word reading: All roads lead to Rome. Language Learning, 49, 447-471.
115. Wagner, D. (1993). Literacy, culture, and development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
116. Wagner, D., Spratt, J., & Ezzaki, A. (1989). Does learning to read in a second language always put the child at a disadvantage? Some counterevidence from Morocco. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 31-48.
117. Wineberg, A. (1999). A minimalist theory of human sentence processing. In S. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Working minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
118. Wydell, T. (1998). What matters in kanji word naming: Consistency, regularity, or On/Kun-reading difference? Reading and Writing, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 359-373.
119. Yamashita, H. (1997). The effects of word-order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 163-187.