Analysing graphic-based electronic discussions: Evaluation of students' activity on Digalo

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4227 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 652-659

  Kochan, Einat Lotan ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS;

DIGALO E-DISCUSSIONS; ELECTRONIC DISCUSSIONS; GRAPHIC ACTIVITY;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 33750574147     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11876663_68     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Baker, M. J. (1998). The Function of Argumentation Dialogue in Cooperative Problem Solving. In F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Argumentation (ISSA'98) (pp.27-33). Amsterdam: SIC SAT Publications.
2. De Laat, M. F., & Lally, V. (2003). Complexity, Theory and Praxis: Researching Collaborative Learning and Tutoring Processes in a Networked Learning Community. Instructional Science, 31, 7-39.
3. Diggelen, van, W., Overdijk, M. & Andriessen, J (2004). Constructing an Argumentative Map Together: Organizing Principles and Their Application. Paper presented at the ORD 2004 symposium, June 9-11 2004, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
4. Diggelen, van, W., Overdijk, M., & De Groot, R. (2005). 'Say it Out Loud in Writing': A Dialectical Inquiry into the Potentials and Pitfalls of Computer Supported Argumentative Discussion, paper presented at CSCL2005, May 30 - June 4, 2005, Taipei, Taiwan.
5. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What Do You Mean by "Collaborative Learning", in P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 1 -19). Oxford: Pergamon.
6. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W.(2001).Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1),7-23.
7. Glassner, A, & Schwarz, B., B. (2005). The Role of Floor Control and of Ontology in Argumentative Activities with Discussion-Based Tools. Paper presented at CSCL2005, May 30 - June 4, 2005, Taipei, Taiwan.
8. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T.(1998).Transcript Analysis of a Computer-Mediated Conferences as a Tool for Testing Constructivist and Social-Constructivist Learning Theories. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching &Learning. August 5-7,1998,Madison, Wisconsin.
9. Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S. & Mäkitalo, K. (2003).Sharing Perspectives in Virtual Interaction: Review of Methods of Analysis. In: B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen and U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (pp.395-404). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
10. Henri, F.(1992).Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis. In: A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers (pp.117-136). London: Springer-Verlag.
11. Keefer, M. W., Zeitz, C, M., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Judging the Quality of Peer-Led Student Dialogue. Cognition & Instruction, 18(1), 53-81.
12. Kuhn,D.(1991).The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lotan-Kochan, E. (2005). The Effect of Teacher Intervention on the Quality of Students' Discussion using Digalo: Developing and Testing an Evaluation Tool. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
14. Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996).Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning among Children of Different Grade, Ability and Knowledge Levels. Cognition and Instruction,14(2),139-179.
15. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C.(in press).Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.),Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press. [http://ikit.org/fulltext/ KBTheory.pdf].
16. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994).The CSILE Project: Trying to Bring the Classroom into World 3.In: K.McGilly (Ed.),Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice, (pp.201-228), Cambridge: MIT Press.
17. Veerman, A. L.,Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G. (2000).Learning through Synchronous Electronic Discussion. Computers &Education,34 (2-3), 1-22.
18. Voss, J.F., & Van Dyke, J.A. (2001).Argumentation in Psychology: Background Comments. Discourse Processes, 32 (2&3),89-111.