Detection of hepatic metastases using ferucarbotran-enhanced MR imaging: Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sensitivity-encoding water-excitation multishot echo-planar sequence (3D-SWEEP)

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1110-1116

  Mori, Kensaku ^a   Takahashi, Nobuyuki ^a   Hiratsuka, Makiko ^a   Shiigai, Masanari ^a   Minami, Manabu ^a   Oda, Tatsuya ^a   Ohkohchi, Nobuhiro ^a   Morishita, Yukio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Echo planar imaging; Liver; Metastasis; Parallel imaging; Superparamagnetic iron oxide; Water excitation

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; FERUCARBOTRAN; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FAST FIELD ECHO; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; LIVER METASTASIS; LIVER RESECTION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MONITORING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL SENSITIVITY ENCODING WATER EXCITATION MULTISHOT ECHO PLANAR SEQUENCE;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FERROSOFERRIC OXIDE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WATER;

EID: 33750531208     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20755     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hagspiel KD, Neidl KF, Eichenberger AC, Weder W, Marincek B. Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US. Radiology 1995;196:471-478.
2. Seneterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1996;200:785-792.
3. Ward J, Naik KS, Guthrie JA, Wilson D, Robinson PJ. Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging alter the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 1999;210:459-466.
4. Reimer P, Jahnke N, Fiebich M, et al. Hepatic lesion detection and characterization: value of nonenhanced MR imaging, superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging, and spiral CT-ROC analysis. Radiology 2000;217:152-158.
5. Ward J, Chen F, Guthrie JA, et al. Hepatic lesion detection after superparamagnetic iron oxide enhancement: comparison of five T2-weighted sequences at 1.0 T by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 2000;214:159-166.
6. Ward J, Guthrie JA, Wilson D, et al. Colorectal hepatic metastases: detection with SPIO-enhanced breath-hold MR imaging-comparison of optimized sequences. Radiology 2003;228:709-718.
7. Kamel IR, Fishman EK. Recent advances in CT imaging of liver metastases. Cancer J 2004,10:104-120.
8. Haider MA, Amitai MM, Rappaport DC, et al. Multi-detector row helical CT in preoperative assessment of small (< or = 1.5cm) liver metastases: is thinner collimation better? Radiology 2002;225:137-142.
9. Abdelmoumene A, Chevallier P, Chalaron M, et al. Detection of liver metastases under 2cm: comparison of different acquisition protocols in four row multidetector-CT (MDCT). Eur Radiol 2005;15: 1881-1887.
10. Kawata S, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. Multidetector CT: diagnostic impact of slice thickness on detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:61-66.
11. Chakraborty DP, Winter LHL. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis of a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 1990;174:873-881.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;203:759-765.
13. Trattnig S, Huber M, MJ, et al. Imaging articular cartilage defects with 3D fat-suppressed echo-planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence and correlation with histology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:8-14.
14. Papanikolaou N, Moulopoulos LA, Gouliamos A, Ispanopoulou S, Vlahos L. Comparison of dual spin echo echo planar imaging (SE-EPI), turbo spin echo with fat suppression and conventional dual spin echo sequences for T2-weighted MR imaging of focal liver lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:715-719.
15. Li T, Mirowitz SA. T2-weighted echo planar MR imaging of the abdomen: optimization of imaging parameters. Clin Imaging 2003;27:124-128.
16. Kuhl CK, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, et al. Sensitivity encoding for diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study. Radiology 2005;234:517-526.
17. Thomasson D, Purdy D, Finn JP. Phase-modulated binomial RF pulses for fast spectrally-selective musculoskeletal imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:563-568.
18. Hardy PA, Recht MP, Piraino DW. Fat suppressed MRI of articular cartilage with a spatial-spectral excitation pulse. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1279-1287.
19. Hennel F. Image-based reduction of artifacts in multishot echoplanar imaging. J Magn Reson 1998;134:206-213.
20. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for last MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962