Chapter 25 Issues in Measuring Port Devolution Program Performance: A Managerial Perspective

Research in Transportation Economics

Volumn 17, Issue , 2006, Pages 599-629

  Brooks, Mary R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750486528     PISSN: 07398859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17025-0     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Airports Council International. (2005). www.aci-na.org, accessed August 22.
2. American Marketing Association. Marketing encyclopedia (1995), American Marketing Association, Chicago
3. Baird A.J. Privatisation of trust ports in the United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales. Transport Policy 2 2 (1995) 135-143
4. Best R.J. Market-based management: Strategies for growing customer value and profitability. 4th ed. (2005), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
5. Bichou K., and Gray R. A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement. Maritime Policy and Management 31 1 (2004) 47-67
6. Boucher, M. (2001). Newly commercialized transport infrastructure providers: Analysis of principles of governance, accountability and performance. www.tc.gc.ca/ctar/
7. Brooks, M. R. (1983). Determinants of shipper's choice of container carrier: A study of eastern Canadian exporters. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales.
8. Brooks M.R. Performance evaluation of carriers by North American companies. Transport Reviews 20 2 (2000) 205-218
9. Bureau of Industry Economics. (1993). International performance indictors - Waterfront. Research report 47. Canberra, Australia.
10. Bureau of Transport and Communication Economics. Review of the waterfront industry reform program (Report 91) (1995), Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra
11. Buttle F., and Burton J. Does service failure influence customer loyalty?. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 1 3 (2002) 217-227
12. Chen T. Land utilization in the container terminal: A global perspective. Maritime Policy and Management 25 4 (1998) 289-304
13. Cox A., and Thompson I. On the appropriateness of benchmarking. Journal of General Management 23 (1998) 1-20
14. Cullinane K.P.B. The productivity and efficiency of ports and terminals: Methods and applications. In: Grammenos C.T. (Ed). Handbook of maritime economics and business (2002), Informa Publishing, London 803-831
15. Deiss, R. (1999). Benchmarking European transport. In: Transport benchmarking: Methodologies, applications and data. European conference of ministers of transport: proceedings of the Paris conference, November, pp. 35-82.
16. Dick, H. & Robinson, R. (1992). Waterfront reform: The next phase. Presented to the national agriculture and resources outlook conference, Australia.
17. Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd. World container terminals: Global growth and private profit (1998), Drewry, London
18. Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd. Global container terminals: Profit, performance and prospects (2002), Drewry, London
19. Elnathan D., Lin T.W., and Young S.M. Benchmarking and management accounting. Journal for Management Accounting Research 8 (1996) 37-54
20. Estache A., Gonzáles M., and Trujillo L. Efficiency gains from port reform and the potential for yardstick competition: Lessons from Mexico. World Development 30 4 (2002) 545-560
21. Francis G., Humphreys I., and Fry J. The benchmarking of airport performance. Journal of Air Transport Management 8 4 (2002) 239-247
22. Francis, G., Humphreys, I., & Fry, J. (2002b). International survey of performance measurement in airports. Transportation Research Record, 1788, 101-108.
23. Friedrichsen, C. (1999). Benchmarking of ports: Possibilities for increased efficiency of ports. In: Transport Benchmarking: Methodologies, Applications and Data. European Conference of ministers of transport: Proceedings of the Paris conference, November, pp. 159-168.
24. Gentle N. The distribution of the benefits of waterfront reform. Maritime Policy and Management 23 3 (1996) 301-319
25. Gillen D. Benchmarking and performance measurement: The role in quality management. In: Brewer A.M., Button K.J., and Hensher D.A. (Eds). Handbook of logistics and supply chain management (2001), Pergamon Press, Oxford 325-338
26. Gillen, D., Henriksson, L., & Morrison, W. (2001). Airport financing, costing, pricing and performance: Final report to the Canadian Transportation Act Review Committee. www.tc.gc.ca/ctar/
27. Hauser J., and Katz G. Metrics: You are what you measure. European Management Journal 16 5 (1998) 517-528
28. Heskett J.L., Jones T.O., Loveman G.W., Sasser Jr. W.E., and Schlesinger L.A. Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review 72 2 (1994) 164-174
29. Hooley G., Saunders G., and Piercy N. Marketing strategy & competitive positioning. 2nd ed. (1998), Prentice Hall, London
30. Hop, Ø., Lea, R., & Lindjord, J.-E. (1996). Measuring port performance and user costs of small ports. Presented to international association of maritime economists annual conference, Vancouver.
31. IIMD (annual). World competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne: International Institute for Management Development. www.imd.ch
32. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). (2002a). The privatization paradox. Latin American Economic Policies, 18, 1-3. www.iadb.org/res
33. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). (2002b). The privatization boom in Latin America. Latin American Economic Policies, 18(2). www.iadb.org/res
34. Ircha M.C. Reforming Canadian ports. Maritime Policy and Management 24 2 (1997) 123-144
35. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action (1996), Harvard University Press, Boston
36. Katz D., and Kahn R.L. The social psychology of organizations (1978), Wiley, New York
37. Keebler J.S., Mandrodt K.B., Durtsche D.A., and Ledyard D.M. Keeping score: Measuring the business value of logistics in the supply chain (1999), Council of Logistics Management, Oak Brook, IL
38. Kent P.E., and Hochstein A. Port reform and privatisation in conditions of limited competition: The experience in Colombia, Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Maritime Policy and Management 25 4 (1998) 313-333
39. Lawrence D., Houghton J., and George A. International comparisons of Australia's infrastructure performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8 4 (1995) 361-378
40. Lirn T.C., Thanopoulou H.A., Beynon M.J., and Beresford A.K.C. An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: A global perspective. Maritime Economics and Logistics 6 1 (2004) 70-91
41. Marlow P., and Paixão Casaca A.C. Measuring lean ports' performance. International Journal of Transport Management 1 4 (2003) 189-202
42. Morris R. A watershed on the Australian waterfront? The 1998 stevedoring dispute. Maritime Policy and Management 27 2 (2000) 107-120
43. Narver J., and Slater S. The effect of market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing 54 (1990) 20-35
44. Newcomer K.E. Tracking and probing program performance: Fruitful path or blind alley for evaluation professionals?. American Journal of Evaluation 22 3 (2001) 337-341
45. Oum T.H., and Yu C. Measuring airports' operating efficiency: A summary of the 2003 ATRS global airport benchmarking report. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 40 6 (2004) 515-532
46. Oum T.H., Yu C., and Fu X. A comparative analysis of productivity performance of the world's major airports: Summary report of the ATRS global airport benchmarking report - 2002. Journal of Air Transport Management 9 5 (2003) 285-297
47. Pestana Barros C. Incentive regulation and efficiency of Portuguese port authorities. Maritime Economics and Logistics 5 1 (2003) 55-69
48. Reichheld F.F., and Teal T. The loyalty effect (1996), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
49. Roll Y., and Hayuth Y. Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). Maritime Policy and Management 20 2 (1993) 153-162
50. Saundry R., and Turnbull P. Private profit, public loss: The financial and economic performance of U.K. ports. Maritime Policy and Management 24 4 (1997) 319-334
51. Serebrisky T., and Trujillo L. An assessment of port reform in Argentina: Outcomes and challenges ahead. Maritime Policy and Management 32 3 (2005) 191-207
52. Shashikumar N. The Indian port privatization model: A critique. Transportation Journal 37 3 (1998) 35-48
53. Talley W.K. Optimum throughput and evaluation of marine terminals. Maritime Policy and Management 15 (1988) 327-331
54. Talley W.K. Performance indicators and port performance evaluation. Logistics and Transportation Review 30 (1994) 339-352
55. Talley, W. K. (1996). Performance evaluation of mixed cargo ports. Presented to international association of maritime economists annual conference, Vancouver.
56. Thomas B.J. The privatization of United Kingdom seaports. Maritime Policy and Management 21 2 (1994) 135-148
57. Tongzon J. Systematizing international benchmarking for ports. Maritime Policy and Management 22 2 (1995) 171-177
58. Tongzon J., and Ganesalingam S. Evaluation of ASEAN port performance and efficiency. Asian Economic Journal 8 3 (1994) 317-330
59. Tovar, B., Jara-Díaz, S., & Trujillo, L. (2003, August). Production and cost functions and their application to the port sector: A literature survey. Policy Research Working Paper 3123. World Bank Institute, Washington, DC.
60. Turner H.S. Evaluating seaport policy alternatives: A simulation study of terminal leasing policy and system performance. Maritime Policy and Management 27 3 (2000) 283-301
61. Turner H.S., Windle R., and Dresner M. North American containerport productivity: 1984-1997. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 40 4 (2004) 339-356
62. UNCTAD. Efficient transport and trade facilitation to improve participation by developing countries in international trade (TD/B/COM.3/67), 7 December (2004), UNCTAD, Geneva