A comparison of conventional and internet political mobilization

American Politics Research

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 759-776

  Krueger, Brian S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet use; Political e mail; Political mobilization; Political participation; Rational prospecting; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750484319     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X06290911     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abramson, P., & Claggett, W. (2001). Recruitment and political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 905-916.
2. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A., & Valentino, N. (1994). Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review, 88, 829-838.
3. Bailey, D. (2000). Election 2000: The Y2K political explosion. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5, 86-88.
4. Best, S., & Krueger, B. (2004). Internet data collection. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Best, S., & Krueger, B. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27, 183-216.
6. Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political mobilization. Social Science Computer Review, 16, 391-401.
7. Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Brady, H., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (1999). Prospecting for participants: Rational expectations and the recruitment of political activists. American Political Science Review, 93, 153-168.
9. Bucy, E. (2000). Social access to the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5, 50-61.
10. Coombs, K. (1999, February). Online voter mobilization: The Gilmore model. Campaigns & Elections, pp. 26-28.
11. Cornfield, M. (2004). New and improved. Campaigns & Elections, pp. 25-25, 42-42.
12. Delli Carpini, M. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341-349.
13. Fallows, D. (2003). Spam: How it is hurting e-mail and degrading life on the Internet. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available from Pew Internet and American Life Project Web site, http://www.pewinternet.org/
14. Farnsworth, S., & Owen, D. (2004). Internet use and the 2000 presidential election. Electoral Studies, 23, 415-429.
15. Fuller, J. (2004). Equality in cyberdemocracy? Gauging gender gaps in on-line civic participation. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 938-957.
16. Gershtenson, J. (2003). Mobilization strategies of the Democrats and Republicans, 1956-2000. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 293-308.
17. Goldstein, K., & Ridout, T. (2002). The politics of participation: Mobilization and turnout over time. Political Behavior, 24, 3-29.
18. Grossman, S. (2004). Keeping unwanted donkeys and elephants out of your inbox: The case for regulating political spam. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 19, 1553-1575.
19. Johnson, T., & Kaye, B. (2003). A boost or bust for democracy? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 9-34.
20. Krueger, B. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American Politics Research, 30, 476-498.
21. Leege, D., Wald, K., Krueger, B., & Mueller, P. (2002). Politics of cultural differences: Social change and voter mobilization strategies in the post-new deal period. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Levy, S. (2004). Dean's net effect is just the start. Newsweek, 143, 73-73.
23. McCullagh, D. (2003). Dean campaign says it spammed. CNET.com. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-5065141.html
24. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
25. Norris, P. (2002). Political campaigning on the Internet: Business as usual? In E. Kamarck & J. Nye, Jr. (Eds.), Governance.com (pp. 81-103). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26. Owen, D. (2000). Service learning and political socialization. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33, 638-640.
27. Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. (2000). Why Americans still don't vote: And why politicians want it that way. Boston: Beacon.
28. Reilly, M., & Deutsch, K. (1999, February). Making the most of a Website: Rules to follow. Campaigns & Elections, pp. 28-32.
29. Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
30. Shah, D., Mcleod, J., & Yoon, S. (2001). Communication, context, and community. Communication Research, 28, 464-506.
31. Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, 56, 175-185.
32. Trippi, J. (2004). The revolution will not be televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the overthrow of everything. New York: HarperCollins.
33. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Ward, S., Gibson, R., & Lusoli, W. (2003). Online participation and mobilization in Britain: Hype, hope and reality. Parliamentary Affairs, 56, 652-668.
35. Weber, L., Loumakis, A., & Bergman, J. (2003). Who participates and why?: An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 26-42.
36. Wielhouwer, P. (2003). In search of Lincoln's perfect list: Targeting in grassroots campaigns. American Politics Research, 31, 632-669.
37. Wolf, G. (2004, September). Weapons of mass mobilization. Wired Magazine, pp. 1-4.