Intersensory redundancy educates selective attention in bobwhite quail embryos

Developmental Science

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 604-615

  Lickliter, Robert ^a   Bahrick, Lorraine E ^a   Markham, Rebecca G ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COLINUS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; TIME; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COLINUS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; MALE; PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 33750377659     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00539.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bahrick, L.E. (1992). Infants' perceptual differentiation of amodal and modality specific audio-visual relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53, 180-199.
2. Bahrick, L.E. (2001). Increasing specificity in perceptual development: infants' detection of nested levels of multimodal stimulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 253-270.
3. Bahrick, L.E. (2002). Generalization of learning in three-and-a-half- month-old infants on the basis of amodal relations. Child Development, 73, 667-681.
4. Bahrick, L.E. (2004). The development of perception in a multimodal environment. In G. Bremmer & A. Slater (Eds.), Theories of infant development (pp. 90-120). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
5. Bahrick, L.E., Flom, R., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 352-363.
6. Bahrick, L.E., & Lickliter, R. (2000). Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36, 190-201.
7. Bahrick, L.E., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy guides early perceptual and cognitive development. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 30 (pp. 153-187). New York: Academic Press.
8. Bahrick, L.E., & Lickliter, R. (2004). Infants' detection of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: a developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 141-151.
9. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2004). Intersensory redundancy guides infants' selective attention, perceptual, and cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 99-102.
10. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2006). Up versus down: the role of intersensory redundancy in the development of infants' sensitivity to the orientation of moving objects. Infancy, 9, 73-96.
11. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., Shuman, M.A., Batista, L.C., & Grandez, C. (April, 2003). Infant discrimination of voices: predictions from the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development biennial meeting, Tampa, FL.
12. Bahrick, L.E., & Pickens, J. (1994). Amodal relations: the basis for intermodal perception and learning in infancy. In D.J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 205-233). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Gibson, E.J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
14. Gibson, E.J., & Pick, A.D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Gogate, L., & Bahrick, L.E. (1998). Intersensory redundancy facilitates learning of arbitrary relations between vowel sounds and objects in seven-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69, 133-149.
17. Heaton, M.B., Miller, D.B., & Goodwill, D.G. (1978). Speciesspecific auditory discrimination in bobwhite quail neonates. Developmental Psychobiology, 11, 13-21.
18. Honeycutt, H., & Lickliter, R. (2001). Order-dependent timing of unimodal and multimodal stimulation affects prenatal auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychobiology, 38, 1-10.
19. Hultsch, H., Schleuss, F., & Todt, D. (1999). Auditory-visual stimulus pairing enhances perceptual learning in a songbird. Animal Behaviour, 58, 143-149.
20. Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representations to the education of attention. In H. Whitehouse (Ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113-153). Oxford: Berg.
21. Kraebel, K.S., & Spear, N.E. (2000). Infant rats are more likely than adolescents to orient differentially to amodal (intensity based) features of single-element and compound stimuli. Developmental Psychobiology, 36, 49-66.
22. Lewkowicz, D.J. (1996). Infants' response to the audible and visible properties of the human face: 1. Role of lexicalsyntactic content, temporal synchrony, gender, and manner of speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 347-366.
23. Lewkowicz, D.J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: an epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 281-308.
24. Lewkowicz, D.J. (2004a). Perception of serial order in infants. Developmental Science, 1, 175-184.
25. Lewkowicz, D.J. (2004b). Serial order processing in human infants and the role of multisensory redundancy. Cognitive Process, 5, 113-122.
26. Lewkowicz, D.J., & Lickliter, R. (1994). The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L.E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260-280.
28. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L.E. (2001). The salience of multimodal sensory stimulation in early development: implications for the issue of ecological validity. Infancy, 2, 451-467.
29. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L.E. (2004). Perceptual development and the origins of multisensory responsiveness. In G. Calvert, C. Spence, & B.E. Stein (Eds.), Handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 643-654). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L.E., & Honeycutt, H. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates prenatal perceptual learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychology, 38, 15-23.
31. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L.E., & Honeycutt, H. (2004). Intersensory redundancy enhances memory in bobwhite quail embryos. Infancy, 5, 253-269.
32. Lickliter, R., & Hellewell, T.B. (1992). Contextual determinants of auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos and hatchlings. Developmental Psychobiology, 25, 17-24.
33. Lickliter, R., & Lewkowicz, D.J. (1995). Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: prenatal physical stimulation affects auditory and visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Developmental Psychology, 31, 609-618.
34. Mellon, R.C., Kraemer, P.J., & Spear, N.B. (1991). Intersensory development and Pavlovian conditioning: stimulus selection and encoding of lights and tones in the preweanling rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 448-464.
35. Morrongiello, B.A., Fenwick, K., & Nutley, T. (1998). Developmental changes in associations between auditory-visual events. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 613-626.
36. Reynolds, G.D, & Lickliter, R. (2002). Effects of prenatal sensory stimulation on heart rate and behavioral measures of arousal in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 1-11.
37. Reynolds, G., & Lickliter, R. (2003). Effects of redundant and non-redundant bimodal sensory stimulation on heart rate in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychobiology, 43, 304-310.
38. Ruff, H.A., & Rothbart, M.K. (1996). Attention in early development: Themes and variations. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Spear, N.E., & McKinzie, D.L. (1994). Intersensory integration in the infant rat. In D.J. Lewkowicz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 133-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Spelke, E.S. (1979). Perceiving bimodally specified events in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 15, 626-636.
41. Stokes, A.W. (1967). Behavior of the bobwhite, Colinus virginianus. Auk, 84, 1-33.
42. Walker-Andrews, A.S. (1997). Infants' perception of expressive behaviors: differentiation of multimodal information. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 437-456.
43. Walker-Andrews, A.S., & Lennon, E. (1985). Auditory-visual perception of changing distance by human infants. Child Development, 22, 373-377.
44. Zukow-Goldring, P. (1997). A social ecological realist approach to the emergence of the lexicon: educating attention to amodal invariants in gesture and speech. In C. Dent-Read & P. Zukow-Goldring (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development (pp. 199-249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.