Effects of Redundant and Nonredundant Bimodal Sensory Stimulation on Heart Rate in Bobwhite Quail Embryos

Developmental Psychobiology

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 304-310

  Reynolds, Greg D ^a,c   Lickliter, Robert ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Intersensory redundancy; Perceptual development; Prenatal heart rate

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FETUS HEART RATE; HEART RATE; NONHUMAN; QUAIL; SENSORY STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; AROUSAL; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COLINUS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; HEART RATE; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

ANIMALIA; COLINUS VIRGINIANUS; PHASIANIDAE;

EID: 0344666716     PISSN: 00121630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dev.10138     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ashton, R. (1971). State and the auditory reactivity of the human neonate. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 12, 339-346.
2. Bahrick, L. E., Flom, R., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 352-363.
3. Bahrick, L. E., & Lickliter, R. (2000). Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36, 190-201.
4. Bahrick, L. E., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Intersensory redundancy guides early perceptual and cognitive development. In: R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 30, pp. 153-187). New York: Academic Press.
5. Calvert, G. A., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (in press). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Freeman, B. M., & Vince, M. A. (1974). Development of the avian embryo. London: Chapman & Hall.
7. Gardner, J. M., & Karmel, B. Z. (1995). Development of arousal-modulated visual preferences in early infancy. Developmental Psychology, 31, 473-482.
8. Gottlieb, G. (1971). Development of species identification in birds: An inquiry into the prenatal determinants of perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Gottlieb, G. (1988). Development of species identification in ducklings: XV. Individual auditory recognition. Developmental Psychobiology, 21, 509-522.
10. Gottlieb, G., Tomlinson, W. T., & Radell, P. L. (1989). Developmental intersensory interference: Premature visual experience suppresses auditory learning in ducklings. Infant Behavior and Development, 12, 1-12.
11. Gray, L. (1990). Activity level and auditory responsiveness in neonatal chickens. Developmental Psychobiology, 23, 297-308.
12. Honeycutt, H., & Lickliter, R. (2001). Order-dependent timing of unimodal and multimodal stimulation affects prenatal auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychobiology, 38, 1-10.
13. Honeycutt, H., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Prenatal experience and perceptual preferences: Evidence for attentional-bias in bobwhite quail embryos. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 270-276.
14. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2001). The salience of multimodal sensory stimulation in early development: Implications for the issue of ecological validity. Infancy, 2, 447-463.
15. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (2002). Intersensory redundancy facilitates prenatal perceptual learning in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychology, 38, 15-23.
16. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Honeycutt, H. (in press). Intersensory redundancy enhances memory in bobwhite quail embryos. Infancy.
17. Lickliter, R., & Hellewell, T. B. (1992). Contextual determinants of auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos and hatchlings. Developmental Psychobiology, 25, 17-24.
18. Lickliter, R., & Lewkowicz, D. J. (1995). Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: Attenuated prenatal sensory stimulation affects postnatal auditory and visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Developmental Psychology, 31, 609-618.
19. Ockleford, E., & Vince, M. A. (1977). Heart rate response to light in the embryos of Japanese quail. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 201, 439-444.
20. Radell, P. L., & Gottlieb, G. (1992). Developmental intersensory interference: Augmented prenatal sensory experience interferes with auditory learning in duck embryos. Developmental Psychology, 28, 795-803.
21. Reynolds, G. D., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Effects of prenatal sensory stimulation on heart rate and behavioral measures of arousal in bobwhite quail embryos. Developmental Psychobiology, 41, 112-122.
22. Richards, J. E. (2000). Development of multimodal attention in young infants: Modification of the startle reflex by attention. Psychophysiology, 37, 65-75.
23. Robinson, S. R., & Smotherman, W. P. (1992). The emergence of behavioral regulation during fetal development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, USA, 662, 53-83.
24. Ronca, A. E., & Alberts, J. R. (1990). Heart rate development and sensory-evoked cardiac responses in perinatal rats. Physiology & Behavior, 47, 1075-1082.
25. Ronca, A. E., & Alberts, J. R. (1994). Sensory stimuli associated with gestation and parturition evoke cardiac and behavioral responses in fetal rats. Psychobiology, 55, 270-282.
26. Ruff, H. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (1996). Attention in early development. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Vince, M. A., & Cheng, R. (1970). The retardation of hatching in Japanese quail. Animal Behaviour, 18, 210-214.
28. Williams, L., & Golenski, J. (1979). Infant behavioral state and speech sound discrimination. Child Development, 50, 1243-1246.