One reading specialist's response to high-stakes testing pressures

Reading Teacher

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 158-167

  Assaf, Lori ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750377143     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.60.2.6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allington, R.L. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.
2. Allington, R.L, Guice, S., Michaelson, N., Baker, K., & Li, S. (1996). Literature-based curriculum in high-poverty schools. In M. Graves, P. van den Broek, & B. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: Every child's right to read (pp. 73-96). New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Borner, K. (2005). Missing the children: When politics and programs impede our teaching. Language Arts, 82, 168-176.
4. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 279-310.
5. Danziger, P. (1998). Amber Brown sees red. New York: Scholastic.
6. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Writing ethnographic field notes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Erickson, F. (2005). Teaching, learning and research in "real reading": Some observations from a laboratory school. In C.M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch, J.V. Hoffman, & D.L. Schallert (Eds.), Fifty-third yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 45-59). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
8. Flores, B.B., & Clark, E.R. (2003). Texas voices speak out about high-stakes testing: Preservice teachers, teachers, and students. Current Issues in Education, 6(3).
9. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://cie.asu.edu/volume6/number3
10. Hoffman, J., Assaf, L.C., & Paris, S. (2001). High-stakes testing in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow? The Reading Teacher, 54, 482-492.
11. Kohn, A. (2002). Poor teaching for poor kids. Language Arts, 79, 251-255.
12. Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13. Lewis, J., Jongsma, K.S., & Berger, A. (2005). Educators on the frontline: Advocacy strategies for your classroom, your school, and your profession. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14. McCracken, N.M., & McCracken, H.T. (2001). Teaching in the time of testing: What have you lost? English Journal, 91(1), 30-35.
15. Merriam, S. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Pennington, J.L (2004). Teaching interrupted: The effect of high-stakes testing on literacy instruction in a Texas elementary school. In F.B. Boyd & C.H. Brock (Eds.), Multicultural and multilingual literacy and language. New York: Guilford.
17. Pressley, M., Wharten-McDonald, R., Allington, R.L., Block, C.C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D. et al. (2000). A study of effective first grade reading instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 331-365.
18. Quatroche, D.J., Bean, R.M., & Hamilton, R.L. (2001). The role of the reading specialist: A review of research. The Reading Teacher, 55, 282-294.
19. Smith, M.L., & Fey, P. (2000). Validity and accountability in high-stakes testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 334-344.
20. Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children: A report of the National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Van Manen, M. (2002). The tone of teaching. Ontario, CA: Althouse Press.
22. Worthy, J. (2000). Teachers' and students' suggestions for motivating middle-school children to read. In T. Shanahan & F. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), Forty-ninth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 441-451). Chicago: National Reading Conference.