Does cerebral monitoring improve ophthalmic surgical operating conditions during propofol-induced sedation?

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 103, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1189-1195

  Oei Lim, Vivian L B ^a   Dijkgraaf, Marcel G W ^a   De Smet, Marc D ^a   White, Martin ^a   Kalkman, Cor J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; PROPOFOL;

ABSENCE OF SIDE EFFECTS; ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; ALERTNESS; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EYE SURGERY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; HYPOTENSION; LATENT PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PTOSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATION DEPRESSION; SEDATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURGEON;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PROPOFOL;

EID: 33750368857     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000244321.38023.92     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hamilton RC, Gimbel HV, Javitt JC. The prevention of complications of regional anesthesia for ophthalmology. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 1990;3:111-25.
2. Ferrari LR, Donlon JV. A comparison of propofol, midazolam and methohexital for sedation during retrobulbar and peribulbar block. J Clin Anesth 1992;4:93-6.
3. Polarz H, Bohrer H, von Tabouillot W, et al. Behavior of intraocular pressure in anesthesia with isoflurane in comparison with propofol/alfentanil. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1995;30:96-8.
4. Neel S, Deitch R Jr, Moorthy SS, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure during low dose intravenous sedation with propofol before cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:1093-7.
5. Frey K, Sukhani R, Pawlowski J, et al. Propofol versus propofol-ketamine sedation for retrobulbar nerve block: comparison of sedation quality, intraocular pressure changes and recovery profiles. Anesth Analg 1999;89:317-21.
6. Weir PM, Munro HM, Reynolds PI. Propofol infusion and the incidence of emesis in pediatric outpatient strabismus surgery. Anesth Analg 1993;76:760-4.
7. Johansen JW, Sebel PS. Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1336-44.
8. Litvan H, Jensen EW, Revuelta M,et al. Comparison of auditory evoked potentials and the A-line ARX Index for monitoring the hypnotic level during sevoflurane and propofol induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:245-51.
9. Struys MM, Jensen EW, Smith W, et al. Performance of the ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index as an indicator of anesthetic depth: a comparison with bispectral index and hemodynamic measures during propofol administration. Anesthesiology 2002;96:803-16.
10. Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GN. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children. Br J Anaesth 1991;67:41-8.
11. White M, Schenkels MJ, Englbers FH, et al. Effect-site modelling of propofol using auditory evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:333-9.
12. Kurita T, Doi M, Katoh T, et al. Auditory evoked potential index predicts the depth of sedation and movement in response to skin incision during sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2001;95:364-70.
13. Vivien B, Di Maria S, Quattara A, et al. Overestimation of bispectral index in sedated intensive care unit patients revealed by administration of muscle relaxant. Anesthesiology 2003;99:9-17.
14. Sakai T, Singh H, Mi WD, et al. The effect of ketamine on clinical endpoints of hypnosis and EEG variables during propofol infusion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43:212-16.
15. Renna M, Wigmore T, Mofeez A, Gilbe Ch. Biasing effect of the electromyogram on BIS: a controlled study during high-dose fentanyl induction. J Clin Monit 2002;17:377-81.
16. Bruhn J, Bouillon TW, Shafer SL. Electromyographic activity falsely elevates the bispectral index. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1485-7.
17. Greif R, Greenwald S, Schweitzer E, et al. Muscle relaxation does not alter hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2002;94:604-8.
18. Messner M, Beese U, Romstock J, et al. The bispectral index declines during neuromuscular block in fully awake persons. Anesth Analg 2003;97:488-91.
19. Habib NF, Balmer HG, Hocking G. Efficacy and safety of sedation with propofol in peribulbar anesthesia. Eye 2002;16:60-6.
20. Janzen PRM, Christys A, Vucevic M. Patient controlled sedation using propofol in elderly patients in day-case cataract surgery. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:635-6.
21. Nishiyama T. Changes in the auditory evoked potentials index by induction doses of four different intravenous anesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:1326-9.
22. Vereecke HEM, Struys MMR, Mortier EP. A comparison of bispectral index and ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index in measuring the clinical interaction between ketamine and propofol anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2003;58:957-61.