The effect of ketamine on clinical endpoints of hypnosis and EEG variables during propofol infusion

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 212-216

  Sakai, T ^a   Singh, Harbhej ^a   Mi, W D ^a   Kudo, T ^a   Matsuki, A ^a  

^a HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anesthetics, intravenous: propofol, ketamine; Monitoring, electroencephalogram: bispectral index, 95 spectral edge frequency, median frequency; Reflex: eyelash, nasal

Indexed keywords

KETAMINE; PROPOFOL; TRAMAZOLINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DOSE RESPONSE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EYELASH; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SNEEZING;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; ANESTHETICS, DISSOCIATIVE; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EYELASHES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; KETAMINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; OXYGEN; PROPOFOL; REFLEX; SNEEZING;

EID: 0032913541     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430216.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 1. Dunnet JM, Prys-Roberts C, Holland DE, Browne BL. Propofol infusion and the suppression of consciousness: dose requirement to induce loss of consciousness and to suppress response to noxious and non-noxious stimuli. Br J Anaesth 1994: 72: 29-34.
2. 2. Vernon JM, Lang E, Sebel PS, Manberg P. Prediction of movement using bispectral electroencephalographic analysis during propofol/alfentanil or isoflurane/alfentanil anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995: 80: 780-785.
3. 3. Geurkink N. Nasal anatomy, physiology and function. J Allergy Clin Immun 1983: 72: 123-128.
4. 4. Wallois F, Macron JM. Nasal air puff stimulations and laryngeal, thoracic and abdominal muscle activities. Respir Physiol 1994: 97: 47-62.
5. 5. Wallois F, Macron JM, Jounieaux V, Duron B. Trigeminal nasal receptors related to respiration and to various stimuli in cats. Respir Physiol 1991: 85: 111-125.
6. 6. Nonaka S, Unno T, Ohta Y, Mori S. Sneeze-evoking region within the brainstem. Brain Res 1990: 511: 265-270.
7. 7. Hui TW, Short TG, Hong W, Suen T, Giu T, Plummer J. Additive interactions between propofol and ketamine when used for anesthesia induction in female patients. Anesthesiology 1995: 82: 641-648.
8. 8. Badrinath S, Avramov MN, Shadrick M, Ivankovitch AD. Use of ketamine-propofol admixture during monitored anesthesia care. Anesthesiology 1997: 87: A10.
9. 9. Friedberg BL. Propofol-ketamine technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993: 17: 297-302.
10. 10. Kochs E, Scharein E, Mollenberg O, Bromm B, Esch JS. Analgesic efficacy of low dose ketamine. Somatosensory-evoked responses in relation to subjective pain ratings. Anesthesiology 1996: 85: 304-314.
11. 11. Billard V, Gambus PL, Chamoun N, Stanski DR, Shafer SL. A comparison of spectral edge, delta power, and bispectral index as EEG measures of alfentanil, propofol and midazolam drug effect. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997: 61: 45-58.
12. 12. Thiel A, Adams HA, Fengler G, Hempelmann G. Studies using S-(+)-ketamine on probands. Computerized EEG analysis and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Anaesthesist 1992: 41: 604-609.
13. 13. Morioka N, Ozaki M, Matsukawa T, Sessler DI, Atarashi K, Suzuki H. Ketamine causes a paradoxical increase in the bispectral index. Anesthesiology 1997: 87: A502.
14. 14. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K. Reduction by fentanyl of the Cp50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli. Anesthesiology 1997: 87: 213-227.
15. 15. Baxandall ML, Thorn JL. The nasocardiac reflex. Anaesthesia 1988: 43: 480-481.
16. 16. Bailey PL. Sinus arrest induced by trivial nasal stimulation during alfentanil-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1990: 65: 718-720.
17. 17. Vuyk J, Engbers FHM, Lemmens HJM, Burm AGL, Vletter AA, Gladines MPR et al. Pharmacodynamics of propofol in female patients. Anesthesiology 1992: 77: 3-9.
18. 18. Liu J, Singh H, White PF. Electroencephalogram bispectral analysis predicts the depth of midazolam-induced sedation. Anesthesiology 1996: 84: 64-69.