This Year's Model: Influences on board and director evaluation

Corporate Governance: An International Review

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 547-557

  Long, Tracy ^a  

^a Boardroom Review   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Board effectiveness; Board evaluation; Board performance; Combined Code; Corporate governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750329037     PISSN: 09648410     EISSN: 14678683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00529.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) Corporate Governance Council (2003) Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations. Sydney: Australian Stock Exchange Ltd.
2. Bhagat, S. and Black, B. S. (1999) The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Performance, Business Lawyer, 54, 921-963.
3. Bhagat, S. and Black, B. S. (2002) The Non-Correlation Between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance, Journal of Corporation Law, Winter, 231-273.
4. Blake, A. (1999) Dynamic Directors: aligning board structure for business success. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
5. Cadbury (1992) Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee.
6. Cadbury, A. (1997) Corporate Governance: An Update on Critical Issues, SES Journal, August.
7. Cascio, W. F. (2004) Board Governance: A Social Systems Perspective, Academy of Management Review, 18, 97-100.
8. Committee on Corporate Governance (1998) The Combined Code: Principles of Good Governance and Code of Best Practice. London: Gee.
9. Company Law Review Steering Group (2000) Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Developing the Framework. London: DTI.
10. Conger, J. A. and Lawler, E. E. (2001) Building a High-Performing Board: how to choose the right members, Business Strategy Review, 12, 11-19.
11. Conger, J. A., Finegold, D. and Lawler, E. E. (1998) Appraising Boardroom Performance, Harvard Business Review, 76, 136-148.
12. Daily, C. M. and Johnson, J. L. (1997) Sources of CEO Power and Firm Financial Performance: a longitudinal assessment, Journal of Management, 23, 97-117.
13. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R. and Cannella, A. A. (2003) Corporate Governance: decades of dialogue and data, Academy of Management Review, 28, 371-382.
14. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E. and Johnson, J. L. (1998) Meta-analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269-290.
15. Davies, A. (1999) A Strategic Approach to Corporate Governance. London: Gower.
16. Demb, A. and Neubauer, F. F. (1992) The Corporate Board: confronting the paradoxes. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Donaldson, W. H. (2003) Corporate Governance: what has happened and where we need to go. Business Economics, July, 16-20.
18. Financial Reporting Council (2003) The Combined Code on Corporate Governance. London: Financial Reporting Council.
19. Forbes, D. P. and Milliken, F. J. (1999) Cognition and Corporate Governance: understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups, Academy of Management Review, 24, 489-505.
20. Garrett, B. (1997) The Fish Rots from the Head. New York: HarperCollins.
21. German Panel on Corporate Governance (2000) Corporate Governance Rules for Quoted German Companies.
22. Greenbury, R. (1995) Director's Remuneration: report of a study group chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury. London: Gee and Co.
23. Hermalin, B. E. and Weisbach, M. S. (2003) Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: a survey of the economic literature, Economic Policy Review - Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 9, 7-26.
24. Herman, R. D. and Renz, D. O. (2000) Board Practices of Especially Effective and Less Effective Local Non-Profit Organisations, American Review of Public Administration, 30, 146-160.
25. Hermes (2002) The Hermes Principles: what shareholders expect of public companies - and what companies should expect of their investors. London: Hermes Pension Management.
26. Higgs, D. (2003) Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors. London: DTI.
27. Ingley, C. and van der Walt, N. (2002) Board Dynamics and the Politics of Appraisal, Corporate Governance - An International Review, 10, 163-174.
28. Kay, J. and Silberston, A. (1995) Corporate Governance, National Institute Economic Review, August, 84-97.
29. Kazanjian, R. K. (2000) Assessing Boards and Individual Directors, Ivey Business Journal, 64, 45-50.
30. Kiel, G. C. and Nicholson, G. J. (2005) Evaluating Boards and Directors, Corporate Governance - An International Review, 13, 613-631.
31. Kiel, G. C., Nicholson, G. J. and Barclay, M. A. (2004) Board, Director and CEO Evaluation. NSW, Australia: McGraw Hill.
32. Kole, S. and Lehn, K. (1997) Deregulation, the Evolution of Corporate Governance, Structure and Survival, American Economic Review, 87, 421-425.
33. Lawler, E. E., Finegold, D., Benson, G. and Conger, J. A. (2002) Adding Value in the Boardroom, MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter, 92-93.
34. Levrau, A. and Van den Berghe, L. A. A. (2004) Toward a Process-Orientated Model for Board Effectiveness. 7th International Conference on Corporate Governance and Board Leadership. Henley Management College.
35. Long, T. E. (2004) The Role of the Non-Executive Director, an empirical investigation into the differences between listed and unlisted UK boards. Henley Management College, Brunel University.
36. Long, T. E., Dulewicz, V. and Gay, K. (2005) The Role of the Non-Executive Director: findings of an empirical investigation into the differences between listed and unlisted UK boards, Corporate Governance - An International Review, 13, 667-679.
37. Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R. and Hillman, A. J. (2003) Board Composition from Adolescence to Maturity: a multitheoretic view, Academy of Management Review, 28, 416-431.
38. Mace, M. L. (1971) Directors: myth and reality. Boston, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.
39. McNulty, A., Roberts, J. and Stiles, P. (2002) Creating Accountability within the Board: the work of the effective non-executive director. Leeds University Business School, Judge Institute of Management, University of Cambridge.
40. Myners, P. (1995) Developing a Winning Partnership. London: DIT.
41. National Association of Corporate Directors (1994) The Blue Ribbon Commission Report on Performance Evaluation of CEOs, Boards, and Directors. Washington: National Association of Corporate Directors.
42. National Association of Corporate Directors (2000) Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Board Evaluation: improving director effectiveness. Washington: National Association of Corporate Directors.
43. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1999) Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
44. Orlikoff, J. E. (1998) Seven Practices of Super Boards, Association Management, 50, 52-58.
45. Patterson, J. (2000) The Link between Corporate Governance and Performance. New York: The Conference Board.
46. Pearce, J. A. and Zahra, S. A. (1992) Board Composition from a Strategic Management Perspective, Journal of Management Studies, 29, 411-438.
47. Pettigrew, A. M. (1992) On Studying Managerial Elites, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 163-182.
48. Plender, J. (2003) Restoring Trust after the Bubble, Business Economics, July, 21-24.
49. Pye, A. (2001a) Corporate Boards, Investors and their Relationships: accounts of accountability and corporate governing in action, Corporate Governance, 9, 186-195.
50. Pye, A. (2001b) A Study in Corporate Boards Over Time: looking backwards to move forwards, British Journal of Management, 12, 33-46.
51. Roberts, J., McNulty, T. and Stiles, P. (2005) Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: creating accountability in the boardroom, British Journal of Management, 16, S5-S26.
52. Smith, R. (2003) Audit Committees Combined Code Guidance. London: Financial Reporting Council.
53. Steinberg, R. (2000) Effective Boards: making the dynamics work, Directorship, 26, 7-9.
54. Stiles, P. and Taylor, B. (1993) Benchmarking Corporate Governance: the impact of the Cadbury Code, Long Range Planning, 26, 61-71.
55. Toronto Stock Exchange (1995) Where were the Directors? Guidelines for Improved Corporate Governance. Toronto: Toronto Stock Exchange.
56. Tricker, R. I. (1999) Information Needed by Directors, Chartered Secretary, October, 34-35.
57. Tucker, S. (2004) Exchange Acts to End Burden of Governance, Financial Times, 16 August. London.
58. Turnbull, N. (1999) Internal Control: guidance for directors on the Combined Code. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
59. van der Walt, N. and Ingley, C. (2001) Evaluating Board Effectiveness: the changing context of strategic governance, Journal of Change Management, 1, 313-331.
60. Vienot Committee (1995) The Boards of Directors of Listed Companies (Vienot Report). Paris: CNPF-AFEP.