Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery using an epidural electrode. Results of a prospective, consecutive series of 191 cases

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 22, 2006, Pages 2614-2623

  Accadbled, Franck ^a   Henry, Patrice ^a   De Gauzy, Jérôme Sales ^a   Cahuzac, Jean Philippe ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DES ENFANTS   (France)

Author keywords

Epidural electrode; Functional neurologic integrity; Neurogenic mixed evoked potential; Scoliosis surgery; Somatosensory evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINAL CORD; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION; TECHNIQUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; EPIDURAL SPACE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL CORD;

EID: 33750298656     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240642.28495.99     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: Results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:6-11.
2. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C, et al. Major intraoperative neurologic deficits in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients. Incidence and etiology at one institution. Spine 1998;23:324-31.
3. Guigui P, Blamoutier A. Complications of surgical treatment of spinal deformities: A prospective multicentric study of 3311 patients [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2005;91:314-27.
4. Potenza V, Weinstein SL, Neyt JG. Dysfunction of the spinal cord during spinal arthrodesis for scoliosis: Recommendations for early detection and treatment. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1679-83.
5. Lyon R, Lieberman JA, Grabovac MT, et al. Strategies for managing decreased motor evoked potential signals while distracting the spine during correction of scoliosis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2004;16:167-70.
6. Legatt AD. Current practice of motor evoked potential monitoring: Results of a survey. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002;19:454-60.
7. Owen JH, Laschinger J, Bridwell K, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory and neurogenic-motor evoked potentials in animals and humans. Spine 1988;13:1111-8.
8. Owen JH, Naito M, Bridwell KH. Relationship among level of distraction, evoked potentials, spinal cord ischemia and integrity, and clinical status in animals. Spine 1990;15:852-7.
9. Owen JH, Bridwell KH, Grubb R, et al. The clinical application of neurogenic motor evoked potentials to monitor spinal cord function during surgery. Spine 1991;16:S385-90.
10. Noordeen MH, Lee J, Gibbons CE, et al. Spinal cord monitoring in operations for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:53-7.
11. Lubicky JP, Spadaro JA, Yuan HA, et al. Variability of somatosensory cortical evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery. Spine 1989;14:790-8.
12. Ashkenaze D, Mudiyam R, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Efficacy of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 1993;18:1627-33.
13. Padberg AM, Russo MH, Lenke LG, et al. Validity and reliability of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular spinal deformity surgery. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:150-8.
14. Owen JH, Sponseller PD, Szymanski J, et al. Efficacy of multimodality spinal cord monitoring during surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 1995;20:1480-8.
15. de Gauzy JS, Roux FE, Henry P, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery of scoliosis: Significance of epidural recording [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1999;85:387-92.
16. Forbes HJ, Allen PW, Waller CS, et al. Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Experience with 1168 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:487-91.
17. Gunnarsson T, Krassioukov AV, Sarjeant R, et al. Real-time continuous intraoperative electromyographic and somatosensory evoked potential recordings in spinal surgery: Correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic findings in a prospective, consecutive series of 213 cases. Spine 2004;29:677-84.
18. Phillips LH II, Blanco JS, Sussman MD. Direct spinal stimulation for intraoperative monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:319-25.
19. Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, et al. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:1082-91.
20. Wilson-Holden TJ, VanSickle D, Lenke LG. The benefit of neurogenic mixed evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during correction of severe scoliosis: A case study. Spine 2002;27:E258-65.
21. Nagle KJ, Emerson RG, Adams DC, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials: A review of 116 cases. Neurology 1996;47:999-1004.
22. Lesser RP, Raudzens P, Luders H, et al. Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 1986;19:22-5.
23. Owen JH. The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity. Spine 1999;24:2649-62.
24. Tucker SK, Noordeen MH, Pitt MC. Spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 2001;10:1-5.
25. DiCindio S, Theroux M, Shah S, et al. Multimodality monitoring of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory-evoked potentials during surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy and other neuromuscular disorders. Spine 2003;28:1851-5.
26. Macri S, De Monte A, Greggi T, et al. Intra-operative spinal cord monitoring in orthopaedics. Spinal Cord 2000;38:133-9.
27. Jasper HH. Report of committee on methods of clinical examination in EEG. Appendix: The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:371.
28. Szalay EA, Carollo JJ, Roach JW. Sensitivity of spinal cord monitoring to intraoperative events. J Pediatr Orthop 1986;6:437-41.
29. Kai Y, Owen JH, Lenke LG, et al. Use of sciatic neurogenic motor evoked potentials versus spinal potentials to predict early-onset neurologic deficits when intervention is still possible during overdistraction. Spine 1993;18:1134-9.
30. Brodkey JS, Richards DE, Blasingame JP, et al. Reversible spinal cord trauma in cats. Additive effects of direct pressure and ischemia. J Neurosurg 1972;37:591-3.
31. Nash CL Jr, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, et al. Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;126:100-5.
32. Lille F, Petit B, Margules S, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal orthopedic surgery in adult patients [in French]. Neurophysiol Clin 1993;23:179-92.
33. Booke JS, Banta JV, Bunke FJ, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Report of a case. Spine 1993;18:518-21.
34. Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, et al. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery. An accepted standard of care. Spine 1998;23:1392-400.
35. Wilson-Holden TJ, Padberg AM, Lenke LG, et al. Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring for pediatric patients with spinal cord pathology undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Spine 1999;24:1685-92.
36. Luk KD, Hu Y, Wong YW, et al. Variability of somatosensory-evoked potentials in different stages of scoliosis surgery. Spine 1999;24:1799-804.
37. Lubitz SE, Keith RW, Crawford AH. Intraoperative experience with neuromotor evoked potentials. A review of 60 consecutive cases. Spine 1999;24:2030-3.
38. Pereon Y, Bernard JM, Fayet G, et al. Usefulness of neurogenic motor evoked potentials for spinal cord monitoring: Findings in 112 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;108:17-23.
39. Pereon Y, Delecrin J, Nguyeni The Tich SN, et al. Successful monitoring of neurogenic mixed evoked potentials elicited by anterior spinal cord stimulation through thoracoscopy during spine surgery. Spine 1999;24:2025-9.
40. Komanetsky RM, Padberg AM, Lenke LG, et al. Neurogenic motor evoked potentials: A prospective comparison of stimulation methods in spinal deformity surgery. J Spinal Disord 1998;11:21-8.
41. Langeloo DD, Lelivelt A, Louis Journee H, et al. Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity: A study of 145 patients. Spine 2003;28:1043-50.
42. Stephen JP, Sullivan MR, Hicks RG, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in children using simultaneous motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. Spine 1996;21:2450-7.
43. Luk KD, Hu Y, Wong YW, et al. Evaluation of various evoked potential techniques for spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Spine 2001;26:1772-7.
44. Delecrin J, Nguyen The Tich S, Passuti N, et al. Neurogenic mixed evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery: Retrospective analysis of 149 cases [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2000;86:46-53.
45. Dawson EG, Sherman JE, Kanim LE, et al. Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine 1991;16:S361-4.
46. Owen JH, Naito M, Bridwell KH, et al. Relationship between duration of spinal cord ischemia and postoperative neurologic deficits in animals. Spine 1990;15:846-51.
47. Hall JE, Levine CR, Sudhir KG. Intraoperative awakening to monitor spinal cord function during Harrington instrumentation and spine fusion. Description of procedure and report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:533-6.
48. MacEwen GD, Bunnell WP, Sriram K. Acute neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:404-8.
49. Pereon Y, Nguyen The Tich S, Delecrin J, et al. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine 1999;24:1169-70.
50. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Lancet 1985;1:1106-7.
51. Tabaraud F, Boulesteix JM, Moulies D, et al. Monitoring of the motor pathway during spinal surgery. Spine 1993;18:546-50.
52. Padberg AM, Bridwell KH. Spinal cord monitoring: current state of the art. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:407-33.
53. MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002;19:416-29.
54. Ben-David B, Haller G, Taylor P. Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia. A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential. Spine 1987;12:536-9.
55. Minahan RE, Sepkuty JP, Lesser RP, et al. Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic 'motor' evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:1442-50.
56. Michel F, Rubini J, Grand C, et al. Neurological complications of surgery for spinal deformities [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1992;78:90-100.
57. Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, et al. Paraplegia resulting from vessel ligation. Spine 1996;21:1232-3.
58. Su CF, Haghighi SS, Oro JJ, et al. "Backfiring" in spinal cord monitoring. High thoracic spinal cord stimulation evokes sciatic response by antidromic sensory pathway conduction, not motor tract conduction. Spine 1992;17:504-8.
59. Toleikis JR, Skelly JP, Carlvin AO, et al. Spinally elicited peripheral nerve responses are sensory rather than motor. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:736-42.
60. Deletis V. The 'motor' inaccuracy in neurogenic motor evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:1365-6.
61. Haghighi SS, York DH, Gaines RW, et al. Monitoring of motor tracts with spinal cord stimulation. Spine 1994;19:1518-24.
62. Pereon Y, Nguyen The Tich S, Delecrin J, et al. Combined spinal cord monitoring using neurogenic mixed evoked potentials and collision techniques. Spine 2002;27:1571-6.