The shape of human gene family phylogenies

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Cotton, James A ^a,b   Page, Roderic D M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OPSIN; RHODOPSIN;

ARTICLE; GENE CLUSTER; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE LOSS; GENE SEQUENCE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE DELETION; GENETICS;

GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 33750250388     PISSN: 14712148     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-66     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Mindell DP, Meyer A: Homology evolving. Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16:434-440.
2. Cotton JA: Analytical methods for detecting paralogy in molecular datasets. Methods Enzymol 2005, 395:700-724.
3. Angers B, Gharbi K, Estoup A: Evidence of gene conversion events between paralogous sequences produced by tetraploidization in salmoninae fish. J Mol Evol 2002, 54:501-10.
4. Cotton JA, Page RDM: Rates and patterns of gene duplication and loss in the human genome. Proc R Soc Lond, Ser B 2005, 272:277-283.
5. Page RDM, Cotton JA: Vertebrate phylogenomics: reconciled trees and gene duplications. Pac Symp Biocomput 2002:536-47.
6. Mooers AØ, Heard SB: Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Q Rev Biol 1997, 72:31-54.
7. Yule GU: A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr J. C. Willis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, Ser A 1924, 213:21-87.
8. Rosen DE: Vicariant patterns and historical explanation in biogeography. Syst Zool 1978, 27:159-188.
9. McKenzie A, Steel M: Properties of phylogenetic trees generated by Yule-type speciation models. Math Biosci 2001, 170:91-112.
10. Mooers AØ: Tree balance and tree completeness. Evolution 1995, 49:379-384.
11. Huelsenbeck JP, Kirkpatrick M: Do phylogenetic methods produce trees with biased shapes? Evolution 1996, 50:1418-1424.
12. Heard SB, Mooers AØ: Imperfect information and the balance of cladograms and phenograms. Syst Biol 1996, 45:115-118.
13. Guyer C, Slowinski JB: Comparison of observed phyogenetic topologies with null expectations among three monophyletic lineages. Evolution 1991, 45:340-350.
14. Heard SB: Patterns in phylogenetic tree shape with variable and evolving speciation rates. Evolution 1996, 50:2141-8.
15. Kirkpatrick M, Slatkin M: Searching for evolutionary patterns in the shape of phylogenetic trees. Evolution 1993, 46:1818-1826.
16. Ohno S: Evolution by Gene Duplication Berlin: Springer; 1970.
17. Dehal P, Boore JL: Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol 2005, 3:e314.
18. McLysaght A, Hokamp K, Wolfe KH: Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat Genet 2002, 31:200-204.
19. Holland PW, Garcia-Fernandez J, Williams NA, Sidow A: Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Dev Suppl 1994:125-133.
20. Garcia-Fernandez J, Holland PW: Archetypal organization of the Amphioxus Hox gene cluster. Nature 1994, 370:563-566.
21. Buard J, Bourdet A, Yardley J, Dubrova Y, Jeffreys AJ: Influences of array size and homogeneity on minisatellite mutation. EMBO Journal 1998, 17:3495-3502.
22. Losos JB, Adler FR: Stumped by trees? A generalized null model for patterns of organismal diversity. Am Nat 1995, 145:329-342.
23. Gascuel O, Hendy MD, Jean-Marie A, McLachlan R: The Combinatorics of Tandem Duplication Trees. Syst Biol 2003, 52:110-118.
24. Martin A: Is tetralogy true? lack of support for the "one-to-four rule". Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18:89-93.
25. Hughes AL: Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. J Mol Evol 1999, 48:565-76.
26. Li W-H, Gu Z, Wang H, Nekrutenko A: Evolutionary analyses of the human genome. Nature 2001, 409:847-9.
27. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ: Biometry 3rd edition. 1995.
28. McKenzie A, Steel M: Distributions of cherries for two models of trees. Math Biosci 2000, 164:81-92.
29. Stam E: Does imbalance in phylogenies reflect only bias? Evolution 2002, 56:1292-1295.
30. Harcourt-Brown KG: Phylogenetic tree shape with special reference to the Cretaceous globotruncaid foraminifera. In PhD thesis University of Bristol, Department of Geology; 2002.
31. Harcourt-Brown KG, Pearson PN, Wilkinson M: The imbalance of palaeontological trees. Paleobiology 2001, 27:188-204.
32. Heard SB: Patterns in tree balance among cladistic, phenetic, and randomly generated phylogenetic trees. Evolution 1992, 46:1818-1826.
33. Seoighe C, Wolfe KH: Extent of genomic rearrangement after genome duplication in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:4447-4452.
34. Lynch M, Conery JS: The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 2000, 290:1151-5.
35. Wolfe KH: Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat Rev Genet 2001, 2:333-41.
36. Furlong RF, Holland PWH: Where vertebrates octoploid? Philos Trans R Soc Lond, Ser B 2002, 357:531-544.
37. Shape of human gene family phylogenies supplementary information [http://darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/~jcotton/human_genetrees]
38. Altschul SF, Bundschuh R, Olsen R, Hwa T: The estimation of statistical parameters for local alignment score distributions. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29:351-61.
39. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:4673-80.
40. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-25.
41. Schmidt HA, Strimmer K, Vingron M, von Haeseler A: TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:502-504.
42. Colless DH: Review of Phylogenetics: the Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. Syst Zool 1982, 31:100-104.
43. Rogers JS: Central moments and probability distribution of Colless's coefficient of tree imbalance. Evolution 1994, 48:2026-2036.
44. Rogers JS: Response of Colless's tree imbalance to number of terminal taxa. Syst Biol 1993, 42:102-105.
45. Agapow PM, Purvis A: Power of Eight Tree Shape Statistics to Detect Nonrandom Diversification: A Comparison by Simulation of Two Models of Cladogenesis. Syst Biol 2003, 51:866-872.
46. Blum MGB, François O: Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imblance. Syst Biol 2006, 55:685-691.
47. Blum MGB, François O, Janson S: The mean, variance and limiting distribution of two statistics sensitive to phylogenetic tree balance. Annals Appl Prob in press.