Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 25, 2006, Pages 4206-4216

  Kuroki, Daiichiro ^a   Nakamizo, Sachio ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binocularly unmatched features; Depth constancy; Depth scaling; Monocular gap stereopsis; Phantom stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LIGHT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 33750020318     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.022     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson B.L. The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis. Nature 367 (1994) 365-368
2. Bradshaw M.F., Glennerster A., and Rogers B.J. The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues. Vision Research 36 (1996) 1255-1264
3. Collett T.S., and Parker A.J. Depth constancy. In: Walsh V., and Kulikowsky J. (Eds). Perceptual constancy: Why things look as they do? (1998), Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom 409-435
4. Collett T.S., Schwarz U., and Sobel E.C. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception 20 (1991) 733-754
5. Cook M., and Gillam B. Depth of monocular elements in a binocular scene: the conditions for da Vinci stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 92-103
6. Cumming B.G., Johnston E.B., and Parker A.J. Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape. Nature 349 (1991) 411-413
7. Dosher B.A., Sperling G., and Wurst S.A. Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3d structure. Vision Research 26 (1986) 973-990
8. Fisher S.K., and Ciuffreda K.J. Accommodation and apparent distance. Perception 17 (1988) 609-621
9. Foley J.M. Binocular distance perception: egocentric distance tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985) 133-149
10. Gillam B., Blackburn S., and Nakayama K. Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours. Vision Research 39 (1999) 493-502
11. Gillam B., and Borsting E. The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays. Perception 17 (1988) 603-608
12. Gillam B., and Nakayama K. Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone. Vision Research 39 (1999) 109-112
13. Grove P.M., Gillam B., and Ono H. Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms. Vision Research 42 (2002) 1859-1870
14. Häkkinen J., and Nyman G. Phantom surface captures stereopsis. Vision Research 41 (2001) 187-199
15. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2002). Seeing in depth: Vol. 2. Depth perception. Canada: I. Porteous.
16. Johnston E.B. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research 31 (1991) 1351-1360
17. Mayhew J.E.W., and Longuet-Higgins H.C. A computational model of binocular depth perception. Nature 297 (1982) 376-378
18. Mitsudo H., Nakamizo S., and Ono H. Greater depth seen with phantom stereopsis is coded at the early stages of visual processing. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1365-1374
19. Mitsudo H., Nakamizo S., and Ono H. A long-distance stereoscopic detector for partially occluding surfaces. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1180-1186
20. Mon-Williams M., and Tresilian J.R. Some recent studies on the extraretinal contribution to distance perception. Perception 28 (1999) 167-181
21. Mon-Williams M., Tresilian J.R., and Roberts A. Vergence provides veridical depth perception from horizontal retinal image disparities. Experimental Brain Research 133 (2000) 407-413
22. Nakamizo S., and Shimono K. Depth scaling by the visual system with absolute distance information: a review. Vision 13 (2001) 163-180 (in Japanese)
23. Nakayama K., and Shimojo S. Da Vinci stereopsis-depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research 30 (1990) 1811-1825
24. O'Leary A., and Wallach H. Familiar size and linear perspective as distance cues in stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception & Psychophysics 27 (1980) 131-135
25. Ono H., and Comerford J. Stereoscopic depth constancy. In: Epstein W. (Ed). Stability and constancy in visual perception (1977), Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York 91-128
26. Pianta M.J., and Gillam B.J. Monocular gap stereopsis: manipulation of the outer edge disparity and the shape of the gap. Vision Research 43 (2003) 1937-1950
27. Pianta M.J., and Gillam B.J. Paired and unpaired features can be equally effective in human depth perception. Vision Research 43 (2003) 1-6
28. Predebon J. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception. Perception 22 (1993) 985-995
29. Rogers B.J., and Bradshaw M.F. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 36 (1993) 253-255
30. Rohaly A.M., and Wilson H.R. The effects of contrast on perceived depth and depth discrimination. Vision Research 39 (1999) 9-18
31. Ryan T.A. Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. Psychological Bulletin 57 (1960) 318-328
32. Schwartz B.J., and Sperling G. Luminance controls the perceived 3-d structure of dynamic 2-d displays. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (1983) 456-458
33. Shimono K., and Nakamizo S. Stereoscopic depth perception as a function of absolute distance in stereonormal and stereoanomalous observers. Perception 19 Suppl. (1990) 362-363 (Abstract)
34. Vreven D., and Welch L. The absence of depth constancy in contour stereograms. Perception 30 (2001) 693-705
35. Wallach H., and Zuckerman C. The constancy of stereoscopic depth. The American Journal of Psychology 76 (1963) 404-412