Relating familiarity-based recognition and the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Detecting a word's recency in the absence of access to the word

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 804-816

  Cleary, Anne M ^a,b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; FAMILIARITY BASED RECOGNITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; RECOGNITION; THEORETICAL STUDY; TIP OF THE TONGUE PHENOMENON; WORD LIST RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 33749595620     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193428     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ATKINSON, R. C., & JUOLA, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. I. Learning, memory, and thinking (pp. 243-293). San Francisco: Freeman.
2. AYERS, M. S., & REDER, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 1-21.
3. BOWER, G. H. (1996). Reactivating a reactivation theory of implicit memory. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 27-72.
4. BROWN, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 204-223.
5. BROWN, R., & MCNEILL, D. (1966). The "tip of the tongue" phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337.
6. CLEARY, A. M. (2002). Recognition with and without identification: Dissociative effects of meaningful encoding. Memory & Cognition, 30, 758-767.
7. CLEARY, A. M. (2004). Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 446-451.
8. CLEARY, A. M., & GREENE, R. L. (2000). Recognition without identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1063-1069.
9. CLEARY, A. M., & GREENE, R. L. (2001). Memory for unidentified items: Evidence for the use of letter information in familiarity processes. Memory & Cognition, 29, 540-545.
10. CLEARY, A. M., & GREENE, R. L. (2004). True and false memory in the absence of perceptual identification. Memory, 12, 231-236.
11. CLEARY, A. M., & GREENE, R. L. (2005). Recognition without perceptual identification: A measure of familiarity? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1143-1152.
12. CLEARY, A. M., LANGLEY, M. M., & SEILER, K. R. (2004). Recognition without picture identification: Geons as components of the pictorial memory trace. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 903-908.
13. COLLINS, A. M., & LOFTUS, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
14. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZIEGLER, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
15. CROWDER, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. CURRAN, T., & CLEARY, A. M. (2003). Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 191-205.
17. GARDINER, J. M., & JAVA, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18, 23-30.
18. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
19. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16.
20. HART, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 685-691.
21. HIRSHMAN, E., & HOSTETTER, M. (2000). Using ROC curves to test models of recognition memory: The relationship between presentation duration and slope. Memory & Cognition, 28, 161-166.
22. JACOBS, A. M., GRAF, R., & KINDER, A. (2003). Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: Evidence for a simple signal-detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 481-488.
23. KELLEY, C. M., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 1-24.
24. KINOSHITA, S. (1995). The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 23, 569-580.
25. MACKAY, D. G., & BURKE, D. M. (1990). Cognition and aging: A theory of new learning and the use of old connections. In T. M. Hess (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 213-263). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
26. MORTON, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 156-178.
27. NEELY, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes. Memory & Cognition, 4, 648-654.
28. NEELY, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
29. NEELY, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. NELSON, T. O., & NARENS, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 338-368.
31. PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F. (1990). A feeling-of-recognition without identification. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 493-500.
32. RAJARAM, S., & GERACI, L. (2000). Conceptual fluency selectively influences knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1070-1074.
33. RASTLE, K. G., & BURKE, D. M. (1996). Priming the tip of the tongue: Effects of prior processing on word retrieval in young and older adults. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 586-605.
34. RATCLIFF, R., SHEU, C.-F., & GRONLUND, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
35. REDER, L. M. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90-138.
36. REDER, L. M., NHOUYVANISVONG, A., SCHUNN, C. D., AYERS, M. S., ANGSTADT, P., & HIRAKI, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 294-320.
37. REDER, L. M., & SCHUNN, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. SCHUNN, C. D., REDER, L. M., NHOUYVANISVONG, A., RICHARDS, D. R., & STROFFOLINO, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity's role in strategy selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 3-29.
39. SCHWARTZ, B. L. (2001). The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time. Memory & Cognition, 29, 117-126.
40. SCHWARTZ, B. L. (2002). Tip-of-the-tongue states: Phenomenology, mechanism, and lexical retrieval. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. SLAMECKA, N. J., & GRAF, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
42. YANIV, I., & MEYER, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 187-205.
43. YONELINAS, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
44. YONELINAS, A. P. (2001a). Components of episodic memory: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. In A. Baddeley, J. P. Aggleton, & M. A. Conway (Eds.), Episodic memory: New directions in research. Originating from a discussion meeting of the Royal Society (pp. 31-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. YONELINAS, A. P. (2001b). Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 Cs of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 361-379.
46. YONELINAS, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517.