Recognition without perceptual identification: A measure of familiarity?

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1143-1152

  Cleary, Anne M ^a,c   Greene, Robert L ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; RECOGNITION; VISION;

HUMANS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 23944488256     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000665     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
2. Cleary, A. M. (2004). Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 446-451.
3. Cleary, A. M., Curran, T., & Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 29, 413-423.
4. Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2000). Recognition without identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1063-1069.
5. Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for unidentified items: Evidence for the use of letter information in familiarity processes. Memory & Cognition, 29, 540-545.
6. Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2004). True and false memory in the absence of perceptual identification. Memory, 12, 231-236.
7. Cleary, A. M., Langley, M. M., & Seiler, K. R. (2004). Recognition without picture identification: Geons as components of the pictorial memory trace. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 903-908.
8. Egan, J. P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (Tech. Note No. AFCRC-TN-58-51). Bloomington: Indiana University, Hearing and Communication Laboratory.
9. Gibson, J. M., & Watkins, M. J. (1988). A pool of 1,086 words with unique two-letter fragments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 390-397.
10. Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., & Levitin, D. J. (1998). Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall. Memory and Cognition, 26, 449-462.
11. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18.
12. Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., & Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 667-680.
13. Hintzman, D. L., & Hartry, A. L. (1990). Commensurability in memory for frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 501-523.
14. Hockley, W. E., & Consoli, A. (1999). Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 657-664.
15. Jacobs, A. M., Graf, R., & Kinder, A. (2003). Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: Evidence for a simple signal-detection process simulated by the multiple read-out model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 481-488.
16. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
17. Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1990). A feeling-of-recognition without identification. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 493-500.
18. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
19. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Tindall, M. (1994). Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 763-785.
20. Wagner, A. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). On the relationship between recognition familiarity and perceptual fluency: Evidence for distinct mnemonic processes. Acta Psychologica, 98, 211-230.
21. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
22. Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763.