Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: Insights from event-related potentials

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1595-1605

  Opitz, Bertram ^a   Cornell, Sonia ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VERBAL MEMORY;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PARIETAL LOBE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 33749430652     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1595     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aggleton, J., & Brown, M. (1999). Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 425-489.
2. Amso, D., Davidson, M. C., Johnson, S. P., Glover, G., & Casey, B. (2005). Contributions of the hippocampus and the striatum to simple association and frequency-based learning. Neuroimage, 27, 291-298.
3. Bar, M., & Aminoff, E. (2003). Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron, 38, 347-258.
4. Carson, D. R., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Semantic priming of person recognition: Categorical priming may be a weaker form of the associative priming effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 1155-1179.
5. Cohen, N. J., Poldrack, R., & Eichenbaum, H. (1997). Memory for items and memory for relations in the procedural/declarative memory framework. Memory, 5, 131-178.
6. Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
7. Curran, T. (1999). The electrophysiology of incidental and intentional retrieval: ERP old new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 37, 771-785.
8. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 923-938.
9. Curran, T., Tepe, K., & Piatt, C. (2006). ERP explorations of dual processes in recognition memory. In H. D. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Binding in human memory: A neurocognitive approach (pp. 467-492). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Donaldson, D. I., & Rugg, M. D. (1998). Recognition memory for new associations-Electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection. Neuropsychologia, 36, 377-395.
11. Düzel, E., Habib, R., Rotte, M., Guderian, S., Tulving, E., & Heinze, H. J. (2003). Human hippocampal and parahippocampal activity during visual associative recognition memory for spatial and nonspatial stimulus configurations. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9439-9444.
12. Eichenbaum, H. (2006). Mechanisms of relational representation. In H. D. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Binding in human memory: A neurocognitive approach (pp. 25-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Eichenbaum, H., Dudchenko, P., Wood, E., Shapiro, M., & Tanila, H. (1999). The hippocampus, memory and place cells: Is it spatial memory or a memory space? Neuron, 23, 209-226.
14. Engelkamp, J., Biegelmann, U., & McDaniel, M. (1998). Relational and item-specific information: Trade-off and redundancy. Memory, 6, 307-333.
15. Friedman, D., & Johnson, R. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51, 6-28.
16. Gardiner, J. M., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Helmstaedter, C., Gleiner, U., Di Perna, M., & Elger, C. (1997). Relational verbal memory processing in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Cortex, 33, 667-678.
18. Hockley, W. (1992). Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 1321-1330.
19. Holdstock, J. S., Mayes, A. R., Roberts, N., Cezayirli, E., Isaac, C. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2002). Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans? Hippocampus, 12, 341-351.
20. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Mayes, A., Holdstock, J., Isaac, C., Montaldi, D., Grigor, J., Gummer, A., Cariga, P., Downes, J., Tsivilis, D., Gaffan, D., Gong, Q., & Norman, K. (2004). Associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively normal item recognition. Hippocampus, 14, 763-784.
22. Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 565-582.
23. Norman, K. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary learning systems approach. Psychological Review, 110, 611-646.
24. Oken, B. S., & Chiappa, K. H. (1986). Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography. Annals of Neurology, 19, 493-494.
25. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
26. O'Reilly, R. C., Busby, R. S., & Soto, R. (2003). Three forms of binding and their neural substrates: Alternatives to temporal synchrony. In A. Cleeremans (Ed.), The unity of consciousness: Binding, integration, and dissociation (pp. 168-192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108, 311-345.
28. Paller, K. A., & Kutas, M. (1992). Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support of the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 375-391.
29. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 184-187.
30. Picton, T., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S., Johnson, R., Jr., Miller, G., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D., Rugg, M., & Taylor, M. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
31. Preston, A. R., Shrager, Y., Dudukovic., N. M., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Hippocampal contribution to the novel use of relational information in declarative memory. Hippocampus, 14, 148-152.
32. Rugg, M. D. (1998). Memories are made of this. Science, 281, 1151-1152.
33. Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392, 595-598.
34. Sharbrough, F., Chatrian, G., Lesser, R. P., Lüders, H., Nuwer, M., & Picton, T. W. (1994). American EEG Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 8, 200-202.
35. Snodgrass, J. C., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117, 34-50.
36. Trott, C. T., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., & Fabiani, M. (1997). Item and source memory: Differential age effects revealed by event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 8, 3373-3378.
37. Tsivilis, D., Otten, L. J., & Rugg, M. D. (2001). Context effects on the neural correlates of recognition memory: An electrophysiological study. Neuron, 31, 497-505.
38. Wilding, E. L., Doyle, M. C., & Rugg, M. D. (1995). Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context-An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 33, 743-767.
39. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval source. Brain, 119, 889-905.
40. Yonelinas, A. (1997). Recognition memory ROC's for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763.
41. Yonelinas, A. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.
42. Yonelinas, A. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
43. Yonelinas, A., & Jacoby, L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 622-643.
44. Yonelinas, A., Kroll, N., Dobbins, I., & Soltani, M. (1999). Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 654-661.