Dynamics and topographic organization of recursive self-organizing maps

Neural Computation

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2529-2567

  Tiňo, Peter ^a   Farkaš, Igor ^b,c   Van Mourik, Jort ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Physics and Informatics   (Slovakia)

^c INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT SCIENCE   (Slovakia)

^d ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PROBABILITY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MARKOV CHAINS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

DATA HANDLING; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; MAPS; MARKOV PROCESSES; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; TOPOGRAPHY; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

DYNAMIC MODULES; GENERALISATION; INTERNAL REPRESENTATION; MARKOVIAN; MARKOVIAN ORGANIZATIONS; NONAUTONOMOUS DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; REPRESENTATIONAL CAPABILITIES; SEQUENTIAL DATA; TOPOGRAPHIC MAP; VECTORIAL DATA;

CONFORMAL MAPPING;

EID: 33749430260     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.10.2529     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barnsley, M. F. (1988). Fractals everywhere. New York: Academic Press.
2. Barreto, de A. G., Araújo, A., & Kremer, S. (2003). A taxanomy of spatiotemporal connectionist networks revisited: The unsupervised case. Neural Computation, 15(6), 1255-1320.
3. Chappell, G., & Taylor, J. (1993). The temporal Kohonen map. Neural Networks, 6, 441-445.
4. Fiser, A., Tusnady, G., & Simon, I. (1994). Chaos game representation of protein structures. Journal of Molecular Graphics, 12(4), 302-304.
5. Hagenbuchner, M., Sperduti, A., & Tsoi, A. (2003). Self-organizing map for adaptive processing of structured data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14(3), 491-505.
6. Hammer, B., Micheli, A., Sperduti, A., & Strickert, M. (2004). Recursive self-organizing network models. Neural Networks, 17(8-9), 1061-1085.
7. Hammer, B., Micheli, A., Strickert, M., & Sperduti, A. (2004). A general framework for unsupervised processing of structured data. Neurocomputing, 57, 3-35.
8. Hammer, B., & Tiňo, P. (2003). Neural networks with small weights implement finite memory machines. Neural Computation, 15(8), 1897-1926.
9. Hao, B.-L. (2000). Fractals from genomes - exact solutions of a biology-inspired problem. Physica A, 282, 225-246.
10. Hao, B.-L., Lee, H., & Zhang, S. (2000). Fractals related to long DNA sequences and complete genomes. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 11, 825-836.
11. Horio, K., & Yamakawa, T. (2001). Feedback self-organizing map and its application to spatio-temporal pattern classification. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 1(1), 1-18.
12. James, D., & Miikkulainen, R. (1995). Sardnet: A self-organizing feature map for sequences. In G. Tesauro, D. Touretzky, & T. Leen (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 7 (pp. 577-584). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
13. Jeffrey, J. (1990). Chaos game representation of gene structure. Nucleic Acids Research, 18(8), 2163-2170.
14. Kenyon, R., & Peres, Y. (1996). Measures of full dimension on affine invariant sets. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 16, 307-323.
15. Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organizing formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 59-69.
16. Kohonen, T. (1990). The self-organizing map. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(9), 1464-1479.
17. Koskela, T., Varsta, M., Heikkonen, J., & Kaski, K. (1998). Recurrent SOM with local linear models in time series prediction. In 6th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 167-172). Brussels: D-Facto Publications.
18. Lee, J., & Verleysen, M. (2002). Self-organizing maps with recursive neighborhood adaptation. Neural Networks, 15(8-9), 993-1003.
19. Oliver, J. L., Bernaola-Galván, P., Guerrero-Garcia, J., & Román-Roldan, R. (1993). Entropic profiles of dna sequences through chaos-game-derived images. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 160(4), 457-470.
20. Principe, J., Euliano, N., & Garani, S. (2002). Principles and networks for self-organization in space-time. Neural Networks, 15(8-9), 1069-1083.
21. Román-Roldan, R., Bernaola-Galván, P., & Oliver, J. (1994). Entropic feature for sequence pattern through iteration function systems. Pattern Recognition Letters, 15, 567-573.
22. Schulz, R., & Reggia, J. (2004). Temporally asymmetric learning supports sequence processing in multi-winner self-organizingmaps. Neural Computation, 16(3), 535-561.
23. Strickert, M., & Hammer, B. (2003). Neural gas for sequences. In T. Yamakawa (Ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps (WSOM'03) (pp. 53-57). Kyushu: Kyushu Institute of Technology.
24. Strickert, M., & Hammer, B. (2005). Merge som for temporal data. Neurocomputing, 64, 39-72.
25. Tiňo, P. (2002). Multifractal properties of Hao's geometric representations of DNA sequences. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 304(3-4), 480-494.
26. Tiňo, P., Čerňanský, M., & Beňušková, L. (2004). Markovian architectural bias of recurrent neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 15(1), 6-15.
27. Tiňo, P., & Dorffner, G. (2001). Predicting the future of discrete sequences from fractal representations of the past. Machine Learning, 45(2), 187-218.
28. Tiňo, P., & Hammer, B. (2004). Architectural bias in recurrent neural networks: Fractal analysis. Neural Computation, 15(8), 1931-1957.
29. Tiňo, P., & Köteles, M. (1999). Extracting finite state representations from recurrent neural networks trained on chaotic symbolic sequences. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10(2), 284-302.
30. Voegtlin, T. (2002). Recursive self-organizing maps. Neural Networks, 15(8-9), 979-992.
31. Wiemer, J. (2003). The time-organized map algorithm: Extending the self-organizing map to spatiotemporal signals. Neural Computation, 16, 1143-1171.
32. Yin, H. (2002). ViSOM - a novel method for multivariate data projection and structure visualisation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 13(1), 237-243.