Phylogeny of the genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae): Evidence from nrITS sequences and morphology

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 813-830

  Degtjareva, G V ^a   Kramina, T E ^a   Sokoloff, D D ^a   Samigullin, T H ^a   Valiejo Roman, C M ^a   Antonov, A S ^a  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Leguminosae; Loteae; Lotus; Morphology; Nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DATA ACQUISITION; MORPHOLOGY;

LEGUMINOSAE; LOTEAE; LOTUS; NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL ITS SEQUENCES;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

AQUATIC PLANT; CHROMOSOME; GENE EXPRESSION; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

ANATOMY; FLOWERS; PLANTS;

DORYCNIUM; FABACEAE; LOTEAE; LOTUS; LOTUS CONIMBRICENSIS; LOTUS CRETICUS;

EID: 33749365248     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B06-035     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Ali, S.I., and Sokoloff, D.D. 2001. A new combination in Pseudolotus Rech.f. (Leguminosae: Loteae). Kew Bull. 56: 721-723.
2. Allan, G.J., and Porter, J.M. 2000. Tribal delimitation and phylogenetic relationships of Loteae and Coronilleae (Faboideae: Fabaceae) with special reference to Lotus: evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Am. J. Bot. 87: 1871-1881.
3. Allan, G.J., Zimmer, E.A., Wagner, W.L., and Sokoloff, D.D. 2003. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of tribe Loteae (Leguminosae): implications for classification and biogeography. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics. Edited by B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. pp. 371-393.
4. Allan, G.J., Francisco-Ortega, J., Santos-Guerra, A., Boerner, E., and Zimmer, E.A. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the geographic origin and classification of Canary Island Lotus (Fabaceae: Loteae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32: 123-138.
5. Arambarri, A.M. 1999. Illustrated catalogue of Lotus L. seeds (Fabaceae). In Trefoil: the science and technology of Lotus. Edited by P.R. Beuselinck. CSSA Special Publication No. 28, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wis. pp. 21-41.
6. Arambarri, A.M. 2000a. A cladistic analysis of the New World species of Lotus L. (Fabaceae, Loteae). Cladistics, 16: 283-297. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031. 2000.tb00284.x.
7. Arambarri, A.M. 2000b. A cladistic analysis of the Old World species of Lotus (Fabaceae: Loteae). Can. J. Bot. 78: 351-360. doi:10.1139/cjb-78-3-351.
8. Arambarri, A.M., Stenglein, S.A., Colares, M.N., and Novoa, M.C. 2005. Taxonomy of the New World species of Lotus (Leguminosae: Loteae). Aust. J. Bot. 53: 797-812. doi:10.1071/BT04101.
9. Ball, P.W., and Chrtková-Žertová, A. 1968. Lotus L. In Flora Europaea. Vol. 2. Edited by T.G. Tutin, V.H. Heywood, N.A. Burges, D.M. Moore, S.M. Valentine, and D.A. Webb. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 173-176.
10. Barykina, R.P., and Kramina, T.E. 2005. A comparative anatomical study of Lotus japonicus and related species. Bull. Moscow Soc. Naturalists Biol. Ser. 110(5): 36-51. [In Russian.]
11. Brand, A. 1898. Monographie der Gattung Lotus. Bot. Jahrb. 25: 166-232.
12. Callen, E.O. 1959. Studies in the genus Lotus (Leguminosae). I. Limits and subdivisions of the genus. Can. J. Bot. 37: 157-165.
13. Chrtková-Žertová, A. 1966. Bemerkungen zur Taxonomie von Lotus uliginosus Schkuhr und L. pedunculatus Cav. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 1: 78-81.
14. Chrtková-Žertová, A. 1967. The variability of critical species of Lotus in Iran and in the neighbouring countries. I. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 2: 283-310.
15. Chrtková-Žertová, A. 1984. Lotus. In Flora Iranica. No. 157. Edited by K.H. Rechinger. Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, Austria. pp. 327-342.
16. Crompton, C.W., and Grant, W.F. 1993. Pollen morphology in Loteae (Leguminosae) with particular reference to the genus Lotus L. Grana, 32: 129-153.
17. Degtjareva, G.V., Valiejo-Roman, CM., Kramina, T.E., Mironov, E.M., Samigullin, T.H., and Sokoloff, D.D. 2003. Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships between Old World and New World members of the tribe Loteae (Leguminosae): new insights from molecular and morphological data, with special emphasis on Ornithopus. Wulfenia, 10: 15-50.
18. Demiriz, H. 1970. Dorycnium Miller. In Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean Islands. Vol. 3. Edited by P.H. Davis. Edinburgh. pp. 512-518.
19. Diaz Lifante, Z. 2000. Dorycnium Mill. In Flora Iberica. Vol. 7. Edited by S. Talavera, C. Aedo, S. Castroviejo, A. Herrero, C. Romero Zarco, F.J. Salgueiro, and M. Velayos. Real Jardin Botanico, Madrid. pp. 812-823.
20. Díez, M.J., and Ferguson, I.K. 1994. The pollen morphology of the tribes Loteae and Coronilleae (Papilionoideae: Loteae). 2. Lotus L. and related genera. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 81: 233-255.
21. Dominguez, E., and Galiano, E.F. 1979. Revision del genero Tetragonolobus Scop. (Fabaceae). Lagascalia, 8: 189-214.
22. Doyle, J.J., and Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
23. Endress, P.K. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
24. Faegri, K., and van der Pijl, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
25. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenetics: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791. doi:10.2307/2408678.
26. Fedorov, A. A. (Editor). 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Nauka, Leningrad.
27. Gillett, J.B. 1959. Lotus in Africa south of the Sahara (excluding the Cape Verde islands and Socotra) and its distinction from Dorycnium. Kew Bull. 3: 361-381.
28. Goldblatt, P., and Johnson, D. 1996. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1992-1993. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Mo. Bot. Gard. 58: 1-276.
29. Goldblatt, P., and Johnson, D. 1998. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1994-1995. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Mo. Bot. Gard. 69: 1-208.
30. Grant, W.F. 1965. A chromosome atlas and interspecific hybridization index for genus Lotus (Leguminosae). Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 7: 457-471.
31. Grant, W.F. 1991. Chromosomal evolution and aneuploidy in Lotus. In Chromosome engineering in plants: genetics, breeding, evolution. Part B. Edited by T. Tsuchiya and P.K. Gupta. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. pp. 429-447.
32. Grant, W.F. 1995. A chromosome atlas and interspecific-intergeneric index for Lotus and Tetragonolobus (Fabaceae). Can. J. Bot. 73: 1787-1809.
33. Grant, W.F., and Small, E. 1996. The origin of the Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae) complex: a synthesis of diverse evidence. Can. J. Bot. 74: 975-989.
34. Grant, W.F., and Zandstra, I.I. 1968. The biosystematics of the genus Lotus (Leguminosae) in Canada. II. Numerical chemotaxonomy. Can. J. Bot. 46: 585-589.
35. Greene, E.L. 1890. Enumeration of the North American Loti. Pittonia, 2: 133-150.
36. Hayashi, M., Miyahara, A., Sato, S., Kato, T., Yoshikawa, M., Taketa, M., Hayashi, M., Pedrosa, A., Onda, R., Imaizumi-Anraku, H., Bachmair, A., Sandal, N., Stougaard, J., Murooka, Y., Tabata, S., Kawasaki, S., Kawaguchi, M., and Harada, K. 2001. Construction of a genetic linkage map of the model legume Lotus japonicus using an intraspecific F2 population. DNA Res. 8: 301-310. doi:10.1093/dnares/8.6.301.
37. Heyn, C.C. 1970a. Studies in Lotus. III. The L. angustissimus group. Isr. J. Bot. 19: 271-292.
38. Heyn, C.C. 1970b. Lotus L. In Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean Islands. Vol. 3. Edited by P.H. Davis. Edinburgh. pp. 518-531.
39. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants (Angiospermae). Vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
40. Isely, D. 1981. Leguminosae of the United States. III. Subfamily Papilionoieae: Tribes Sophoreae, Podalyrieae, Loteae. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 25: 1-264.
41. Kawaguchi, M., Motomura, T., Imaizumi-Anraku, H., Akao, S., and Kawasaki, S. 2001. Providing the basis for genomics in Lotus japonicus: the accessions Miyakojima and Gifu are appropriate crossing partners for genetic analysis. Mol. Genet. Genomics, 266: 157-166.
42. Kirkbride, J.H., Jr. 1994. Taxonomic circumscription of the genus Lotus Linnaeus (Fabaceae, Loteae), its tribal position, and its species. In Proceedings of the 1st International Lotus Symposium, St. Louis, Missouri, 22-24 March 1994. Edited by P.R. Beuselinck and C.A. Roberts. Univ. Missouri Ext. Publ. MX 411, Columbia, Mo. pp. 11-15.
43. Kirkbride, J.H., Jr. 1999. Lotus systematics and distribution. In Trefoil: the science and technology of Lotus. Edited by P.R. Beuselinck. CSSA Special Publication No. 28, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wis. pp. 1-20.
44. Kramina, T.E. 1992. A study of geographical variability of some morphological characters of Lotus corniculatus L. s.l. (Leguminosae Juss.) in European Russia and adjacent territories. Bull. Moscow Soc. Nat. Biol. Ser. 97: 108-119. [In Russian.]
45. Kramina, T.E. 1999. Taxonomic revision of Lotus L. section Lotus (Leguminosae) in the territory of European Russia and adjacent countries. Ph.D. thesis, Higher Plants Department, Moscow State University, Moscow. [In Russian.]
46. Kramina, T.E., and Sokoloff, D.D., 1997. Lotus roudairei Bonnet and taxonomic relationships between African and North American species of the tribe Loteae (Papilionaceae). Adansonia Ser. 3, 19(2): 321-328.
47. Kramina, T.E., and Sokoloff, D.D. 1999. Taxonomic bearing of stylodium tooth in the genus Lotus (Papilionaceae) with special reference to Lotus creticus L. Feddes Repert. 110: 527-533.
48. Kramina, T.E., and Sokoloff, D.D. 2001. Kebirita, a new genus of Leguminosae-Loteae from NW Africa. Bull. Moscow Soc. Nat. Biol. Ser. 106: 58-63. [In Russian.]
49. Kramina, T.E., and Sokoloff, D.D. 2003. On Lotus sect. Erythrolotus and related taxa (Leguminosae). Bull. Moscow Soc. Nat. Biol. Ser. 108: 59-62. [In Russian.].
50. Kramina, T.E., and Sokoloff, D.D., 2004. A taxonomic study of Lotus australis complex (Leguminosae), with special emphasis on plants from Pacific Ocean islands. Adansonia Ser. 3, 26(2): 171-197.
51. Kramina, T.E., and Tikhomirov, V.N. 1991. Within-population variability of some morphological characters of Lotus corniculatus L. s.l. (Leguminosae) on the territory of European part of USSR. Bull. Moscow Soc. Nat. Biol. Ser. 96: 117-126. [In Russian.]
52. Kuprijanova, L.A. 1937. A new annual species of Lotus. Bot. Mat. (Leningrad), 7: 37-39. [In Russian.]
53. Lassen, P. 1979. Dorycnium fulgurans, a neglected species from the Balearic Islands. Bot. Notis. 132: 357-358.
54. Lassen, P. 1986. Acmispon sect. Simpeteria, Acmispon roudairei, Dorycnium strictum, Lotus benoistii. In Med-Checklist Notulae, 13. Edited by W. Greuter and T. Raus. Willdenowia 16(1): 107-112.
55. Lavin, M., and Delgado, A. 1990. Pollen brush of Papilionoideae (Leguminosae): morphological variation and systematic utility. Am. J. Bot. 77: 1294-1312.
56. Lavin, M., and Sousa, S.M. 1995. Pylogenetic systematics and biogeography of the tribe Robinieae (Leguminosae). Syst. Bot. Monogr. 45: 1-165.
57. Lavin, M., Wojciechowski, M.F., Richman, A., Rotella, J., Sanderson, M.J., and Beyra-Matos, A. 2001. Identifying tertiary radiations of Fabaceae in the Greater Antilles: alternatives to cladistic vicariance analysis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162(Suppl. 6): S53-S76. doi:10.1086/323474.
58. Lewis, G., Schrire, B., Mackinder, B., and Lock, M. 2005. Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
59. e fascicule). Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 15: 380-395.
60. Maire, R., Weiller, M., and Wilczek, E. 1935. Sertulum austromaroccanum. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. N. 26: 120-122.
61. Martins, E.S., and Sokoloff, D.D. 2003. Lotus robsonii E.S. Martins & D.D. Sokoloff, sp. nov. In Flora Zambesiaca. Vol. 3. Part 7. Edited by G. Pope R.M. Polhill, and E.S. Martins. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK. pp. 3-4.
62. Miniaev, N.A., and Ulle, Z.G. 1977. De speciebus generis Lotus L. in regionibus orientali-septentrionalibus partis Europaeae URSS crescentibus. Nov. Syst. Plant. Vasc. 14: 153-161. [In Russian.]
63. Mönch, C. 1910. Über Griffel und Narbe einiger Papilionaceae. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 27: 83-126.
64. Nanni, L., Ferradini, N., Taffetani, F., and Papa, R. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of Anthyllis spp. Plant Biology (Stuttgart), 6: 454-464.
65. Ottley, A.M. 1944. The American Loti with special consideration of a proposed new section, Simpeteria. Brittonia, 5: 81-123.
66. Polhill, R.M. 1981. Loteae, Coronilleae. In Advances in legume systematics. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK. pp. 371-375.
67. Polhill, R.M. 1994. Complete synopsis of legume genera. In Phytochemical dictionary of the Leguminosae. Vol. 1. Edited by F.A. Bisby, J. Buckingham, and J.B. Harborne. Chapman & Hall, London. pp. xlix-lvii.
68. Posada, D., and Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817.
69. Raelson, J.V., and Grant, W.F. 1988. Evaluation of hypotheses concerning the origin of L. corniculatus using isoenzyme data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 267-276.
70. Raelson, J.V., and Grant, W.F. 1989. An isoenzyme study in the genus Lotus (Fabaceae). Experimental protocols and genetic basis of electrophoretic phenotype. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 595-607.
71. Rechinger, K.H. 1984. Pseudolotus, Podolotus. In Flora Iranica. No. 157. Edited by K.H. Rechinger. Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, Austria. pp. 346-350.
72. Rikli, M. 1901. Die Gattung Dorycnium. Bot. Jahrb. 31: 314-404.
73. Ronquist, F., and Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572-1574. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.
74. Schischkin, B.K., and Sergievskaja, L.P. 1932. New species of the genus Lotus L. from Asia. Animadv. Syst. Herb. Univ. Tomsk. 7-8: 5-6. [In Russian.]
75. Schweinfurth, G. 1896. Sammlung arabisch-aethiopischer Pflanzen Ergebnisse von Reisen in den Jahren 1881, 88, 89, 91, 92, und 94. Bull. Herb. Boiss. 4: 9-266.
76. Sokoloff, D.D. 1997. Comparative study of fruit anatomy in the genus Anthyllis (Papilionaceae, Loteae). Bot. Zhurn. 82: 58-74. [In Russian.]
77. Sokoloff, D.D. 1999. Ottleya, a new genus of Papilionaceae-Loteae from North America. Feddes Repert. 110: 89-97.
78. Sokoloff, D.D. 2000. New combinations in Acmispon (Leguminosae, Loteae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 37: 125-131.
79. Sokoloff, D.D. 2001. New records of Lotus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Loteae) from Africa and southwest Asia. Kew Bull. 56: 715-720.
80. Sokoloff, D.D. 2003a. On system and phylogeny of the tribe Loteae DC. (Leguminosae). Bull. Moscow Soc. Naturalists. Biol. Ser. 108: 35-48. [In Russian.]
81. Sokoloff, D.D. 2003b. Morphology and classification of the tribe Loteae DC of the family Leguminosae. Dr. Sci. thesis, Higher Plants Department, Moscow State University, Moscow. [In Russian.]
82. Sokoloff, D.D. 2006. Cladistic analysis of the tribe Loteae (Leguminosae) based on morphological characters. In Plant taxonomy: advances and relevance. Edited by A.K. Pandey, J. Wen, and J.V.V. Dogra. CBS Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi. pp. 45-81.
83. Sokoloff, D.D., and Lock, J.M. 2005. Tribe Loteae. In Legumes of the world. Edited by G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK. pp. 455-465.
84. Stenglein, S.A., Colares, M.N., Arambarri, A.M., Novoa, M.C., Vizcaino, C.E., and Katinas, L. 2004. Leaf epidermal microcharacters of the Old World species of Lotus (Leguminosae: Loteae) and their systematic significance. Aust. J. Bot. 51: 459-469.
85. Swofford, D.L. 2000. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
86. Talavera, S., and Salgueiro, F.J. 1999. Sobre el tratamiento de la familia Leguminosae en Flora Iberica. Lagascalia, 21: 155-222.
87. Taubert, P. 1894. Leguminosae. In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Teil 3, Abt. 3. Edited by A. Engler and K. Prantl. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany. pp. 70-385.
88. Tikhomirov, V.N., and Sokoloff, D.D. 1997. Taxonomic position of Vermifrux abyssinica (A. Rich.) Gillett and taxonomy of the tribe Loteae s.l. (Papilionaceae). Feddes Repert. 108: 335-344.
89. Ujhelyi, J. 1960. Etudes taxonomiques sur la groupe du Lotus corniculatus L. sensu lato. Ann. Hist.-Nat. Mus. Natl. Hung. Bot. 52: 185-200.
90. Valdés, B. 2000. Lotus L., Tetragonolobus Scop. In Flora Iberica. Vol. 7. Edited by S. Talavera, C. Aedo, S. Castroviejo, A. Herrero, C. Romero Zarco, F.J. Salgueiro, and M. Velayos. Real Jardin Botanico, Madrid. pp. 776-812, 823-829.
91. White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., and Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Edited by M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, and T.J. White. Academic Press, Inc., New York. pp. 315-322.
92. Wojciechowski, M.F., Sanderson, M.J., Steele, K.P., and Liston, A. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the 'Temperate Herbaceous Tribes' of papilionoid legumes: A supertree approach. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics. Edited by B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK. pp. 277-298.
93. Zharkikh, A.A., Rzhetsky, A.Yu., Morozov, P.S., Sitnikova, T.L., and Krushkal, J.S. 1990. A package of microcomputer programs for sequence analysis and construction of phylogenetics. Gene, 101: 217-218.
94. Zohary, M. 1987. Flora Palaestina. Part 2. Jerusalem.