Taxonomy of the new world species of Lotus (Leguminosae: Loteae)

Australian Journal of Botany

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 797-812

  Arambarri, Ana M ^a   Stenglein, Sebastián A ^a,b   Colares, Marta N ^a   Novoa, María C ^a  

^a FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS Y FORESTALES   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

ACMISPON; FABACEAE; LOTEAE; OTTLEYA; OTUS;

EID: 29144502202     PISSN: 00671924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/BT04101     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allan GJ, Porter JM (2000) Tribal delimitation and phylogenetic relationships of Loteae and Coronilleae (Faboideae: Fabaceae) with special reference to Lotus: evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. American Journal of Botany 87, 1871-1881.
2. Allan GJ, Zimmer EA, Wagner WL, Sokoloff DD (2003) Molecular phylogenetic analyses of tribe Loteae (Leguminosae): implications for classification and biogeography. In 'Advances in legume systematics'. Part 10. Higher level systematics. (Eds BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau) pp. 371-393. (Royal Botanic Gardens: Kew, UK)
3. Arambarri AM (1999) Illustrated catalogue of Lotus L. seeds (Fabaceae). In 'Trefoil: the science and technology of Lotus'. Special Publication No. 28. (Ed. PR Beuselinck) pp. 21-41. (American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI)
4. Arambarri AM (2000a) A cladistic analysis of the New World species of Lotus L. (Fabaceae, Loteae). Cladistics 16, 283-297. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031. 2000.tb00284.x
5. Arambarri AM (2000b) A cladistic analysis of the Old World species of Lotus L. (Fabaceae: Loteae). Canadian Journal of Botany 78, 351-360. doi: 10.1139/cjb-78-3-351
6. Ashby E (1948) Studies in the morphogenesis of leaves. II. The area, cell size and number of leaves of Ipomoea in relation to their position on the shoot. New Phytologist 47, 177-195.
7. Barber HN (1955) Adaptative gene substitutions in Tasmanian Eucalyptus. I. Genes controlling the developmant of glaucousness. Evolution 9, 1-14.
8. Barneby RC (1989) Fabales. In 'Intermountain Flora. Vol. 3, part B'. (Eds A Cronquist, AH Holmgren, NH Holmgren, JL Reveal) pp. 190-198. (The New York Botanical Garden: New York)
9. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Cuttler D, Ditsch F, Meusel I, Wilhelmi H (1998) Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 126, 237-260. doi: 10.1006/bojl.1997.0137
10. Belesky DP (1999) Lotus species used in reclamation, renovation, and revegetation. In 'Trefoil: the science and technology of Lotus'. Special Publication No. 28. (Ed. PR Beuselinck) pp. 133-143. (American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI)
11. Bird SM, Gray JE (2003) Signals from the cuticle affected epidermal cell differentiation. New Phytologist 157, 9-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00543. x
12. Brand A (1898) Monographie der Gattung Lotus. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeshich Pflanzengeographie 25, 166-232.
13. Burkart A, Vilchez O, Crisci JV (1972) Estudio de Lotus subpinnatus Lag. y L. wrangelianus F. et M. dos Leguminosas vicarias del Oeste Norte y Sud-Americano. Darwiniana 17, 458-466.
14. Callen EO (1959) Studies in the genus Lotus (Leguminosae). I. Limits and subdivisions of the genus. Canadian Journal of Botany 37, 157-165.
15. Crompton CW, Grant WF (1993) Pollen morphology in Loteae (Leguminosae) with particular reference to the genus Lotus L. Grana 32, 129-153.
16. D'Ambrogio de Argüeso A (1986) 'Manual de técnicas en histología vegetal.' (Hemisferio Sur: Buenos Aires)
17. Degtjareva GV, Valiejo-Roman CM, Kramina TE, Mironov EM, Samigullin TH, Sokoloff DD (2003) Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships between Old World and New World members of the tribe Loteae (Leguminosae): new insights from molecular and morphological data, with special emphasis on Ornithopus. Wulfenia 10, 15-50.
18. Ditsch F, Patha H. Barthlott W (1995) Micromorphology of epicuticular waxes in Fabales s.l. and its systematic significance. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 68, 297-310.
19. Dizeo de Strittmatter C (1973) Nueva técnica de diafanización. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 15, 126-129.
20. Gentry HS (1942) Lotus. In 'Río Mayo Plants'. (Ed. HS Gentry) p. 135. (Publications of the Carnegie Institution of Washington: Stanford, CA)
21. Grant WF (1965) A chromosome atlas and interspecific hybridization index for the genus Lotus (Leguminosae). Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 7, 457-471.
22. Grant WF (1995) A chromosome atlas and interspecific-intergenic index for Lotus and Tetragonolobus (Fabaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 73, 1787-1809.
23. Grant WF (1997) Karyotypes and idiograms of some western North American species of Lotus (Fabaceae). Aliso 16, 73-80.
24. Gray A (1863) Synopsis of the species of Hosackia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia 15, 346-352.
25. Greene EL (1890) Enumeration of the North American Loti. Pittonia 2, 133-150.
26. Isely D (1981) Leguminosae of the United States. III. Subfamily Papilionoideae: tribes Sophoreae, Podalyrieae, Loteae. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 29, 1-264.
27. Jones HG (1987) Breeding for stomatal characters. In 'Stomatal function'. (Eds E Zeiter, GD Farquhar, IR Cowan) pp. 431-443. (Stanford University: Stanford, CA)
28. Kirkbride JH, Jr (1999) Lotus systematics and distribution. In 'Trefoil: the science and technology of Lotus'. Special Publication No. 28. (Ed. PR Beuselinck) pp. 1-20. (American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI)
29. Lackey JA (1978) Leaflet anatomy of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) and its relation to taxonomy. Botanical Gazette 139, 436-446. doi: 10.1086/337019
30. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (1950) 'Anatomy of the dicotyledons.' 1st edn. (University Press: Oxford)
31. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (1979) 'Anatomy of the dicotyledons.' 2nd edn. Vol. 1 (Clarendon Press: Oxford)
32. Munz PA (1955) Lotus yollabolliensis. Aliso 3, 117-118.
33. Munz PA (1959) Leguminosae. In 'A California flora'. (Ed. PA Munz) pp. 795-897. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)
34. Ottley AM (1923) A revision of the California species of Lotus. University of California. Publication of Botany 10, 189-305.
35. Ottley AM (1944) The American Loti with special consideration of a proposed new section, Simpeteria. Brittonia 5, 81-123.
36. Poole I, Weyers JDB, Lawson T, Raven JA (1996) Variations in stomatal density and index: implications for palaeoclimatic reconstructions. Plant, Cell & Environment 19, 705-712.
37. Raven PH (1963) A flora of San Clemente Island, California. Aliso 5, 289-347.
38. Rohlf FJ (1998) 'NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system.' Version 2.0. (Exeter software: New York)
39. Salisbury E (1927) On the causes and ecological significance of stomatal frequency with special reference to the woodland flora. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London 216, 1-65.
40. Sinclair CB, Sharma GK (1971) Epidermal and cuticular studies of leaves. Journal of the Tennesee Academy of Science 46, 2-11.
41. Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas. Science Bulletin 38, 1409-1438.
42. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1962) The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon 11, 33-40.
43. Sokoloff DD (1999) Ottleya, a new genus of Papilionaceae-Loteae from North America. Feddes Repertorium 110, 89-97.
44. Sokoloff DD (2000a) New combinations in Acmispon (Leguminosae, Loteae). Annales Botanici Fennici 37, 125-131.
45. Sokoloff DD (2000b) New combinations in Hosackia Douglas ex Benth. (Leguminosae: Loteae). Kew Bulletin 55, 1009-1010.
46. Sokoloff DD (2003) On taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribe Loteae DC. (Leguminosae). Bulletin of the Moscow Society of Naturalists, Biological Series 108, 35-48.
47. Stace CA (1965) Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bulletin of the British Museum. Botany Series 4, 1-78.
48. Standley PC, Steyermark JA (1946) Flora of Guatemala. V. Leguminosae. Fieldiana Botany 24, 1-368.
49. Steiner JJ (1999) Birdsfoot trefoil origins and germplasm diversity. In 'Trefoil: the science and technology of Lotus'. Special Publication No. 28. (Ed. PR Beuselinck) pp. 81-96. (American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI)
50. Stenglein SA, Arambarri AM, Colares MN, Novoa MC, Vizcaíno CE (2003a) Leaf epidermal characteristics of Lotus: subgenus Acmispon (Fabaceae: Loteae) and a numerical taxonomic evaluation. Canadian Journal of Botany 81, 933-944. doi: 10.1139/b03-090
51. Stenglein SA, Colares MN, Arambarri AM, Novoa MC, Vizcaino CE, Katinas L (2003b) Leaf epidermal microcharacters of the Old World species of Loins (Leguminosae: Loteae) and their systematic significance. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 459-469. doi: 10.1071/BT02102
52. Stenglein SA, Arambarri AM, Vizgarra ON, Balatti PA (2004) Micromorphological variability of leaf epidermis in Mesoamerican common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Leguminosae). Australian Journal of Botany 52, 73-80. doi: 10.1071/BT02083
53. Uphof JC, Hummel K, Staesche K (1962) 'Plant hairs.' 2nd edn. Vol. 4. Encyclopedia of plant anatomy. (Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin)
54. Weyers JDB, Lawson T (1997) Heterogeneity in stomatal characteristics. Advances in Botanical Research 26, 318-352.