The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension in mainstream and special (SLI) education

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 559-576

  Takala, Marjatta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Mainstream; Reading strategies; Reciprocal reading; SLI

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749240988     PISSN: 00313831     EISSN: 14701170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00313830600953824     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alfassi, M. (1998) Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35, pp. 309-332.
2. Aro, T. (2002). In Luetun ymmärtämisen teoriaa ja harjoituksia. Kummi 1 [Practising reading comprehension; in Finnish]. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
3. Arvonen, J. (2002). In Toiminta lukemisen tukena. Näkymöintistrategia toisluokkalaisten kirjallisuuden opetuksessa [Activities supporting reading. Envisioning in teaching literature to 2nd graders; in Finnish]. Academic dissertation, University of Turku, series C, part 182. Scripta lingua fennica edita. Turku: Painosalama.
4. Burroughs, E. (1964). In Tarzan apinain kuningas [Tarzan - The king of the Apes; in Finnish]. Helsinki: Taikajousi.
5. Carter, C. J. (1997) Why reciprocal teaching. Educational Leadership, 54, pp. 64-68.
6. Catts, H. W. (1993) The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, pp. 948-958.
7. Chapman, J. W. and Tunmer, W. E. (2003) Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, pp. 5-24.
8. Dollaghan, C. (1998) Late talker or SLI? The story of Jay X. Seminars in Speech and Language, 19, pp. 7-14.
9. Gough, P. B. and Turner, W. E. (1986) Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, pp. 6-10.
10. Hacker, D. J. and Tenent, A. (2002) Implementing reciprocal teaching in the classroom: Overcoming obstacles and making modifications. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, pp. 699-718.
11. Hansson, K. and Nettelbladt, U. (2002) Assessment of specific language impairment in Swedish. Logopedic Phoniatrics Vocology, 27, pp. 146-154.
12. Hart, E. R. and Speece, D. L. (1998) Reciprocal teaching goes to college: Effects for postsecondary students at risk for academic failure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, pp. 670-681.
13. Hibbing, A. N. and Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2003) A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual images to improve comprehension for middle school struggling readers. Reading Teacher, 56, pp. 758-771.
14. Holopainen, E. (2003). In Strategies for listening and reading comprehension and problematic listening and reading comprehension of the text during the third and ninth grades of primary school. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 218.
15. Inovaara, M. and Malmio, A. (Eds.) (2002). In Lukuhaastetta koko elämä [Reading is a challenge for the whole life; in Finnish]. Äidinkielen opettajain liiton vuosikirja XLVI [Finnish language teachers association, annual book]. Helsinki: Painorauma.
16. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2000) Training reading comprehension in adequate decoders/poor comprehenders: Verbal versus visual strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, pp. 772-782.
17. Karjalainen, R. (2000) [The development of reading comprehension during primary school; in Finnish]. Academic dissertation, University of Joensuu. Kasvatustieteellisiä julkaisuja, no. 63. In Tekstinymmärtämisen kehittyminen ja kehittäminen peruskoulun ala-asteella.
18. Korpilahti, P. (1996) Kielen kehitykselliset häiriöt; viivästynyt ja poikkeava kielenkehitys [Developmental disorders in language; in Finnish]. In Kommunikoinnin häiriöt - syitä, ilmenemismuotoja ja kuntoutuksen perusteita [Disorders in communication; in Finnish]. (pp. 39-58). Tampere: Tammer-Paino.
19. Lederer, J. (2000) Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, pp. 91-107.
20. Lovett, M. W. and Borden, S. L. and Warren-Chaplin, P. M. and Lacerenza, L. and Deluca, T. and Giovinazzo, R. (1996) Text comprehension training for disabled readers: An evaluation of reciprocal teaching and text analysis training programs. Brain and Language, 54, pp. 447-480.
21. Lyytinen, S. and Lehto, J. (1998) Hierarchy rating as a measure of text macro processing: Relationship with working memory and school achievement. In Educational Psychology. (pp. 157-169).
22. Marston, D. and Dend, S. L. and Kim, D. and Diment, K. and Rogers, D. (1995) Comparison of reading intervention approaches for students with mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, pp. 20-37.
23. Mastropieri, M. A. (2001) Can middle school students with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, pp. 18-28.
24. Mynttinen, S. and Lahti, P. (1999). In Hiljainen lukeminen [Quiet reading; in Finnish] (A seminar study in special teacher education). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
25. Oakhill, J. and Yuill, N. (1996) Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In Reading comprehension difficulties. Processes and intervention. (pp. 69-92). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Palinscar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, pp. 117-175.
27. Rich, R. and Blake, S. (1994) Using pictures to assist in comprehension and recall. Intervention in School and Clinic, 29, pp. 271-275.
28. Rosenshine, B. and Meister, C. (1994) Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, pp. 479-530.
29. Schmidt, R. J. and Rozendal, M. S. and Greenman, G. G. (2002) Reading instruction in the inclusion classroom: Research-based practices. Remedial and Special Education, 23, pp. 130-140.
30. Seymor, J. R. and Osana, H. P. (2003) Reciprocal teaching procedures and principles: Two teachers' developing understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, pp. 325-344.
31. Slater, W. H. and Horstman, F. R. (2002) Teaching reading and writing to struggling middle school and high school students: The case for reciprocal teaching. Preventing School Failure, 46, pp. 163-166.
32. Speece, D. L. and MacDonald, V. and Kilsheimer, L. and Krist, J. (1997) Research to practice: Preservice teachers reflect on reciprocal teaching. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12, pp. 177-187.
33. Swanson, P. N. and De La Paz, S. (1998) Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in School & Clinic, 33, pp. 209-218.
34. Williams, J. P. (2002) Reading comprehension strategies and teacher preparation. In What research has to say about reading instruction. (pp. 243-260). Newark DE: International Reading Association.