Chapter 17 The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects

Progress in Brain Research

Volumn 154, Issue , 2006, Pages 315-325

  Bülthoff, Isabelle ^a   Newell, Fiona N ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

biological motion; categorical perception; dynamic objects; faces; familiarity; haptic recognition

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ASSOCIATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; FACE; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OBJECT RELATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEX ALLOCATION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; WALKING; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33749131313     PISSN: 00796123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54017-8     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Baudoin J.Y., and Tiberghien G. Sex is a dimension of face recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28 (2002) 362-365
2. Bayes T. An essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 53 (1764) 370-418
3. Beale J.M., and Keil F.C. Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition 57 (1995) 217-239
4. Blake R. Cats perceive biological motion. Psychol. Sci. 4 (1993) 54-57
5. Blanz, V. and Vetter, T. (1999) A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In: SIGGRAPH 99 Conference Proceedings, pp. 187-194.
6. Bruce V., Burton A.M., Hanna E., Healey P., Mason O., Coombe A., Fright R., and Linney A. Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces?. Perception 22 (1993) 131-152
7. Bruce V., Ellis H., Gibling F., and Young A. Parallel processing of the sex and familiarity of faces. Can. J. Psychol. 41 (1987) 510-520
8. Bruce V., and Young A.W. Understanding face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 77 (1986) 305-327
9. Bülthoff I., and Bülthoff H.H. Image-based recognition of biological motion, scenes and objects. In: Peterson M.A., and Rhodes G. (Eds). Analytic and Holistic Processes in the Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes (2003), Oxford University Press, New York 146-176
10. Bülthoff, I., Bülthoff, H.H. and Sinha, P. (1997) View-based representations for dynamic 3D object recognition. (Technical Report No. 47, http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/bu/techr/index.html) Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik, Tübingen, Germany.
11. Bülthoff I., Bülthoff H.H., and Sinha P. Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception. Nat. Neurosci. 1 (1998) 254-257
12. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S.Y., and Tarr M.J. How are 3-dimensional objects represented in the brain?. Cereb. Cortex 5 (1995) 247-260
13. Bülthoff I., Kersten D., and Bülthoff H.H. General lighting can overcome accidental viewing. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35 (1994) 1741
14. Bülthoff I., and Newell F.N. Categorical perception of sex occurs in familiar but not unfamiliar faces. Vis. Cogn. 11 (2004) 823-855
15. Calder A.J., Young A.W., Perrett D.I., Etcoff N.L., and Rowland D.A. Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions. Vis. Cogn. 3 (1996) 81-117
16. Casey S., and Newell F.N. The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition. Exp. Brain Res. 166 (2005) 583-591
17. de Gelder B., Teunisse J., and Benson P.J. Categorical perception of facial expressions: categories and their internal structure. Cogn. Emotion 11 (1997) 1-23
18. Diamond R., and Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 5 (1986) 107-117
19. Duncan J. An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 (2001) 820-829
20. Edelman S., and Bülthoff H.H. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Res. 32 (1992) 2385-23400
21. Ernst M.O., and Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 162-169
22. Freedman D.J., Riesenhuber M., Poggio T., and Miller E.K. Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 291 (2001) 312-316
23. Gauthier I., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., and Anderson A.W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 191-197
24. Goldstone R.L. Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123 (1994) 178-200
25. Goldstone R.L., Lippa Y., and Shiffrin R.M. Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition 78 (2001) 27-43
26. Goshen-Gottstein Y., and Ganel T. Repetition priming for familiar and unfamiliar faces in a sex-judgment task: evidence for a common route for the processing of sex and identity. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26 (2000) 1198-1214
27. Grill-Spector K., Knouf N., and Kanwisher N. The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 555-562
28. In: Harnad S.R. (Ed). Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition (1987), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK
29. Hill H., and Johnston A. Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Curr. Biol. 11 (2001) 880-885
30. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model of its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14 (1973) 201-211
31. Knappmeyer B., Thornton I.M., and Bülthoff H.H. The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Res. 43 (2003) 1921-1936
32. Kourtzi Z., and Nakayama K. Distinct mechanisms for the representation of moving and static objects. Vis. Cogn. (Special Issue) 9 1/2 (2002) 248-264
33. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., and Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Res. 35 (1995) 389-412
34. Le Gal P.M., and Bruce V. Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgements of faces. Percept. Psychophys. 64 (2002) 230-243
35. Levin D.T., and Beale J.M. Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, cross-race faces, and inverted faces. Percept. Psychophys. 62 (2000) 386-401
36. Ling Y., and Hurlbert A. Colour and size interactions in a real 3D object similarity task. J. Vis. 4 (2004) 721-734
37. Livingston K., Andrews J., and Harnad S. Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24 (1998) 732-753
38. Newell F.N., and Bülthoff H.H. Categorical perception of familiar objects. Cognition 85 (2002) 113-143
39. Newell F.N., and Findlay J.M. The effect of depth rotation on object identification. Perception 26 (1997) 1231-1257
40. Newell F.N., Sheppard D.M., Edelman S., and Shapiro K.L. The interaction of shape- and location-based priming in object categorisation: evidence for a hybrid "what+where" representation stage. Vision Res. 45 (2005) 2065-2080
41. Newell F.N., Wallraven C., and Huber S. The role of characteristic motion in object categorization. J. Vis. 4 (2004) 118-129
42. Palmer, S.E., Rosch, E. and Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In: Long, J., Baddeley, A. (Eds.), Attention and Performance, Vol. IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 135-151.
43. Rossion B. Is sex categorisation from faces really parallel to face recognition?. Vis. Cogn. 9 (2002) 1003-1020
44. Wild H.H., Barrett S.E., Spence M.J., O'Toole A.J., Cheng Y.D., and Brooke J. Recognition and sex categorization of adults' and children's faces in the absence of sex stereotyped cues. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 77 (2000) 261-299
45. Young A.W., Rowland D.A., Calder A.J., Etcoff N.L., Seth A., and Perrett D.I. Facial expression megamix: test of dimensionality and category accounts of emotion recognition. Cognition 63 3 (1997) 271-313
46. Yovel G., and Kanwisher N. Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 44 (2004) 889-898