Control and semantic resource sensitivity

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 465-511

  Asudeh, Ash ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844543815     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226705003427     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Andrews, A. (1982). The representation of case in Modern Icelandic. In Bresnan (ed.), 427-503.
2. Asudeh, A. (2000). Functional identity and resource-sensitivity in control. In Butt, M. & King, T. H. (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG00 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 2-24.
3. Asudeh, A. (2002a). A resource-sensitive semantics for equi and raising. In Beaver, D., Kaufmann, S., Clark, B. & Casillas, L. (eds.), The construction of meaning. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 1-21.
4. Asudeh, A. (2002b). Richard III. In Andronis, M., Debenport, E., Pycha, A. & Yoshimura, K. (eds.), CLS 38: The main session (vol. 1). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 31-46.
5. Asudeh, A. (2004). Resumption as resource management. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
6. Asudeh, A. & Crouch, R. (2002). Glue Semantics for HPSG. In van Eynde, F., Hellan, L. & Beermann, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International HPSG Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 1-19.
7. Barwise, J. & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4. 159-219.
8. Blevins, J. P. (to appear). Feature-based grammar. In Borsley, R. D. & Börjars, K. (eds.), Nontransformational syntax: a guide to current models. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Boeckx, C. & Hornstein, N. (2003). Reply to 'Control is not movement'. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 269-280.
10. Boeckx, C. & Hornstein, N. (2004). Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 431-452.
11. Bouma, G., Malouf, R. & Sag, I. A. (2001). Satisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19. 1-65.
12. Bresnan, J. (1982a). Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 343-434.
13. Bresnan, J. (ed.) (1982b). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Carpenter, B. (1997). Type-logical semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Chierchia, G. (1984a). Anaphoric properties of infinitives and gerunds. In Cobler, M., MacKaye, S. & Wescoat, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association. 28-39.
17. Chierchia, G. (1984b). Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
18. Chierchia, G. (1990). Anaphora and attitudes DESE. In Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J. & van Emde Boas, P. (eds.), Semantics and contextual expressions. Dordrecht: Foris. 1-32.
19. Chierchia, G. & Jacobson, P. (1986). Local and long distance control. In Berman, S., Choe, J.-W. & McDonough, J. (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, 57-74.
20. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
21. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
22. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Crouch, R. & van Genabith, J. (1999). Context change, underspecification, and the structure of Glue Language derivations. In Dalrymple (ed.), 117-189.
24. Crouch, R. & van Genabith, J. (2000). Linear logic for linguists. Ms., PARC & Dublin City University. [Available at http://www2.parc.com/istl/ members/crouch/; checked 10/02/2005.]
25. Culicover, P. W. & Jackendoff, R. (2001). Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 493-512.
26. Curry, H. B. & Feys, R. (1958). Combinatory logic (vol. 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27. Dalrymple, M. (ed.) (1999). Semantics and syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar: the resource logic approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Dalrymple, M. (2001). Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Dalrymple, M., Gupta, V., Lamping, J. & Saraswat, V. (1999a). Relating resource-based semantics to categorial semantics. In Dalrymple (ed.), 261-280.
30. Dalrymple, M., Kaplan, R. M., Maxwell, J. T. & Zaenen, A. (eds.) (1995). Formal issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
31. Dalrymple, M., Lamping, J., Pereira, F. & Saraswat, V. (1999b). Overview and introduction. In Dalrymple (ed.), 1-38.
32. Dalrymple, M., Lamping, J., Pereira, F. & Saraswat, V. (1999c). Quantification, anaphora, and intensionality. In Dalrymple (ed.), 39-89.
33. Dalrymple, M., Lamping, J. & Saraswat, V. (1993). LFG semantics via constraints. In Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the European ACL. University of Utrecht: European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 97-105.
34. de Groote, P. (ed.) (1995). The Curry-Howard isomorphism. Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium: Academia.
35. Dowty, D. (1985). On recent analyses of the semantics of control. Linguistics and Philosophy 8. 291-231.
36. Dowty, D. & Jacobson, P. (1989). Agreement as a semantic phenomenon. In Powers, J. & de Jong, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. 95-101.
37. Dowty, D. R., Wall, R. E. & Peters, S. (1981). Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
38. Falk, Y. (2001). Lexical-Functional Grammar: an introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
39. Frank, A. & van Genabith, J. (2001). LL-based semantics construction for LTAG - and what it teaches us about the relation between LFG and LTAG. In Butt, M. & King, T. H. (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 104-126.
40. Ghomeshi, J. (2001). Control and thematic agreement. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46. 9-40.
41. Girard, J.-Y. (1987). Linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science 50. 1-102.
42. Halvorsen, P.-K. & Kaplan, R. M. (1988). Projections and semantic description in Lexical-Functional Grammar. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems. Tokyo: Institute for New Generation Systems. 1116-1122.
43. Hashemipour, M. M. (1989). Pronominalization and control in Modern Persian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
44. Higginbotham, J. (1989). Elucidations of meaning. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 465-517.
45. Higginbotham, J. (1992). Reference and control. In Larson, R. K., Iatridou, S., Lahiri, U. & Higginbotham, J. (eds.), Control and grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 79-108.
46. Hornstein, N. (1999). Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 69-96.
47. Howard, W. A. (1980). The formulae-as-types notion of construction. In Seldin, J. P. & Hindley, J. R. (eds.), To H. B. Curry: essays on combinatory logic, lambda calculus and formalism. London: Academic Press. 479-490. [Circulated in unpublished form from 1969. Reprinted in de Groote (ed.) (1995), 15-26.]
48. Jacobson, P. (1990). Raising as function composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 13. 423-475.
49. Jacobson, P. (1999). Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22. 117-184.
50. Kaplan, R. M. (1987). Three seductions of computational psycholinguistics. In Whitelock, P., Wood, M. M., Somers, H. L., Johnson, R. & Bennett, P. (eds.), Linguistic theory and computer applications. London: Academic Press. 149-181. [Reprinted in Dalrymple et al. (eds.) (1995), 339-367.]
51. Kaplan, R. M. (1989). The formal architecture of Lexical-Functional Grammar. In Huang, C.-R. & Chen, K.-J. (eds.), Proceedings of ROCLING II. 3-18. [Reprinted in Dalrymple et al. (eds.) (1995), 7-27.]
52. Kaplan, R. M. & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan (ed.) (1982b), 173-281.
53. Kaplan, R. M. & Zaenen, A. (1989). Long-distance dependencies, constituent structure, and functional uncertainty. In Baltin, M. & Kroch, A. (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 17-42. [Reprinted in Dalrymple et al. (eds.) (1995), 137-165.]
54. Klein, E. & Sag, I. A. (1985). Type-driven translation. Linguistics and Philosophy 8. 163-201.
55. Kokkonidis, M. (2003). Glue and λDRT for meaning assembly. Ms., Department of Philosophy, King's College, London.
56. Kokkonidis, M. (2004). First-order Glue. Ms., Meta Research.
57. Koopman, H. (2000). The syntax of specifiers and heads. London: Routledge.
58. Koopman, H. & Sportiche, D. (1982). Variables and the Bijection Principle. Linguistic Review 2. 139-160. [Reprinted in Koopman (2000), 19-39.]
59. Kroeger, P. (1993). Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
60. Ladusaw, W. A. (1987). Inference patterns from infinitival complements. In Crowhurst, M. (ed.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 6. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association. 163-171.
61. Landau, I. (2000). Elements of control: structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
62. Landau, I. (2003). Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34. 471-498.
63. Link, G. (1995). Algebraic semantics for natural language: some philosophy, some applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43. 765-784. [Reprinted in Link (1998), 189-211.]
64. Link, G. (1998). Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
65. Maling, J. (1983). Transitive adjectives: a case of categorial reanalysis. In Heny, F. & Richards, B. (eds.), Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles. Dordrecht: Foris. 253-289.
66. Montague, R. (1974). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Hintikka, J., Moravscik, J. & Suppes, P. (eds.), Approaches to natural language: proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel. 221-242.
67. Moortgat, M. (1997). Categorial type logics. In van Benthem, J. & ter Meulen, A. (eds.), Handbook of logic and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 93-177. [Co-published with Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.]
68. Morrill, G. (1994). Type Logical Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
69. Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago & Stanford, CA: The University of Chicago Press & CSLI Publications.
70. Postal, P. M. (1970). On coreferential complement subject deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 439-500.
71. Pullum, G. K. (1982). Syncategorematicity and English infinitival to. Glossa 16. 181-215.
72. Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Rivero, M. L. & Ralli, A. (eds.) (2001). Comparative syntax of Balkan languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Rosenbaum, P. S. (1967). The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Sag, I. A. & Pollard, C. (1991). An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67. 63-113.
76. van Benthem, J. (1988). Strategies of intensionalization. In Bodnár, I., Máté, A. & Pólos, L. (eds.), Intensional logic, history of philosophy, and methodology: to Imre Ruzsa on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Budapest: Department of Symbolic Logic, Eötvös University. 41-59.
77. van Benthem, J. (1991). Language in action: categories, lambdas, and dynamic logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland. [Reprinted 1995. MIT Press.]
78. van Genabith, J. & Crouch, R. (1999). How to glue a donkey to an f-structure. In Bunt, H. & Muskens, R. (eds.), Computing meaning (vol. 1). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 129-148.
79. Wurmbrand, S. (2001). Infinitives: restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
80. Zaenen, A. & Engdahl, E. (1994). Descriptive and theoretical syntax in the lexicon. In Atkins, B. T. S. & Zampolli, A. (eds.), Computational approaches to the lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 181-212.
81. Zec, D. (1987). On obligatory control in clausal complements. In Iida, M., Wechsler, S. & Zec, D. (eds.), Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure: Interactions of morphology, syntax, and discourse (vol. 1). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 139-168.