Reply to "control is not movement"

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 269-280

  Boeckx, Cedric ^a   Hornstein, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Control; Learnability; Nominal; Raising; theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844435599     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/002438903321663406     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Boeckx, Cedric. 1999. Conflicting c-command requirements. Studia Linguistica 53:227-250.
2. Boeckx, Cedric. 2002. Patterns of subject raising across experiencers. Ms., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
3. Bowers, John. 1973. Grammatical relations. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
4. Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. by Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, 506-569. Berlin: de Gruyter.
8. Courtenay, Karen. 1998. Summary: Subject control verb PROMISE in English, http://linguistlist.org/issues/ 9/9-651.html.
9. Culicover, Peter, and Ray Jackendoff. 2001. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32:493-512.
10. Ferreira, Marcello. 2000. Hyperraising and null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. Master's thesis, Unicamp, São Paulo, Brazil.
11. Grimshaw, Jane. 1991. Argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30:69-96.
13. Hornstein, Norbert. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory ofconstrual. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Hornstein, Norbert. 2002. On control. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
15. Lakoff, George. 1971. Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
16. Landau, Idan. 1999. Elements of control. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
17. Manzini, Maria Rita, and Anna Roussou. 2001. A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua 110:409-447.
18. Martin, Roger. 1996. A minimalist theory of PRO and control. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
19. O'Neill, John. 1995. Out of control. In NELS 25, ed. by Jill Beckman, 361-371. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
20. Rodrigues, Cilene. 2000. Deriving Brazilian Portuguese referential null subjects from movement. Generals paper, University of Maryland, College Park.
21. Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. Rosenbaum, Peter. 1970. A principle governing deletion in English sentential complementations. In Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. by Roderick Jacobs and Rosenbaum, 20-29. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.
23. Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11:203-238.
24. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1987. Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.