G-matrix Fourier transform NOESY-based protocol for high-quality protein structure determination

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 25, 2005, Pages 9085-9099

  Shen, Yang ^a   Atreya, Hanudatta S ^a   Liu, Gaohua ^a   Szyperski, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL BONDS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEINS; PROTONS;

DIGITAL RESOLUTION; G-MATRIX FOURIER TRANSFORM (GFT); NOESY-BASED PROTOCOL; RESONANCE ASSIGNMENT;

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SPECTROMETER;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CARBON ISOTOPES; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FOURIER ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NITROGEN ISOTOPES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 21244479278     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0501870     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Wüthrich, K. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids; Wiley: New York, 1986.
2. Cavanagh, J.; Fairbrother, W. J.; Palmer, A. G.; Skelton, N. J. Protein NMR Spectroscopy; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1996.
3. (a) Kainosho, M. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4, 858-861.
4. (b) Acton, T. B. et al. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 394, 210-243.
5. (a) Güntert, P. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 2003, 43, 105-125.
6. (b) Baran, M. C.; Huang, Y. J.; Moseley, H. N. B.; Montelione, G. T. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3451-3555.
7. (c) Huang, Y. J.; Moseley, H.; Baran, M. C.; Arrowsmith, C. H.; Powers, R.; Tejero, R.; Szyperski, T.; Montelione, G. T. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 394, 111-141.
8. (a) Montelione, G. T.; Zheng, D.; Huang, Y.; Gunsalus, C.; Szyperski, T. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7, 982-984.
9. (b) Yee A. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 1825-1830.
10. (a) Moseley, H. N. B.; Monleon, D.; Montelione, G. T. Methods Enzymol. 2001, 339, 91-108.
11. (b) Huang, Y. J.; Swapna, G. V.; Rajan, P. K.; Ke, H.; Xia, B.; Shukla, K.; Inouye, M.; Montelione, G. T. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 327, 521-536.
12. (c) Huang, Y. J.; Powers, R.; Montelione, G. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1665-1674.
13. (a) Güntert, P.; Mumenthaler, C.; Wüthrich, K. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 273, 283-298.
14. (b) Hermann, T.; Güntert, P.; Wüthrich, K. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 319, 209-227.
15. (c) Güntert, P. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004, 278, 347-372.
16. For the present study, an evaluation using the program CYANA was best suited. This is because we assigned for YqfB all intraresidue, sequential, and medium-range NOEs by predicting NOESY peak lists from chemical shift data and considering information on secondary structure elements (see Materials and Methods). Hence, a top-down algorithm appeared to be the natural choice to complement our chemical shift-based assignment protocol.
17. (a) Kay, L. E.; Clore, G. M.; Bax, A.; Gronenborn, A. M. Science 1990, 249, 411-414.
18. (b) Clore, G. M.; Kay, L. E.; Bax, A.; Gronenborn, A. M. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 12-18.
19. (c) Fairbrother, W. J.; Palmer, A. G.; Rance, M.; Reizer, J.; Saier, M. H.; Wright, P. E. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 4413-4425.
20. (d) Grzesiek, S.; Dobeli, H.; Gentz, R.; Garotta, G.; Labhardt, A. M.; Bax, A. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 8180-8190.
21. (e) Archer, S. J.; Vionson, V. K.; Pollard, T. D.; Torchia, D. A. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 6680-6687.
22. (f) Vuister, G. W.; Clore, G. M.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Powers, R.; Garrett, D. S.; Tschudin, R.; Bax, A. J. Magn. Reson. 1993, B101, 210-213.
23. Styles, P.; Soffe, N. F.; Scott, C. A.; Cragg, D. A.; White, D. J.; White, P. C. J. Magn. Reson. 1984, 60, 397-404.
24. Monleon, D.; Colson, K.; Moseley, H. N. B.; Anklin, C.; Oswald, R.; Szyperski, T.; Montelione, G. T. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2002, 2, 93-101.
25. Atreya, H. S.; Szyperski, T. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 394, 78-108.
26. (a) Farmer, B. T.; Mueller, L. J. Biomol. NMR 1994, 4, 673-687.
27. (b) Pascal, S. M.; Muhandiram, D. R.; Yamazaki, T.; Forman-Kay, J. D.; Kay, L. E. J. Magn. Reson. 1994, 103, 197-201.
28. (c) Jerala, R.; Rule, G. S. J. Magn. Reson. 1995, B108, 294-298.
29. (d) Uhrin, D.; Bramham, J.; Winder, S. J.; Barlow, P. N. J. Biomol. NMR 2000, 18, 253-259.
30. (e) Xia, Y.; Yee, A.; Arrowsmith, C. H.; Gao, X. J. Biomol. NMR 2003, 27, 193-203.
31. Morshauser, R. C.; Zuiderweg, E. R. P. J. Magn. Reson. 1999, 139, 232- 239.
32. (a) Szyperski, T.; Wider, G.; Bushweller, J. H.; Wüthrich, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9307-9308.
33. (b) Szyperski, T.; Pellecchia, M.; Wüthrich, K. J. Magn. Reson. 1994, B105, 188-191.
34. (c) Brutscher, B.; Simorre, J. P.; Caffrey, M. S.; Marion, D. J. Magn. Reson. 1994, B105, 77-82.
35. (d) Szyperski, T.; Braun, D.; Fernández, C.; Bartels, C.; Wüthrich, K. J. Magn. Reson. 1995, B108, 197-203.
36. (e) Szyperski, T.; Braun, D.; Fernández, C.; Wüthrich, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8146-8147.
37. (f) Szyperski, T.; Banecki, B.; Braun, D.; Glaser, R. W. J. Biomol. NMR 1998, 11, 387-405.
38. (g) Szyperski, T.; Yeh, D. C.; Sukumaran, D. K.; Moseley, H. N. B.; Montelione, G. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 8009-8014.
39. (a) Brutscher, B.; Morelle, N.; Cordier, F.; Marion, D. J. Magn. Reson. 1995, B109, 397-404.
40. (b) Kupce, E.; Freeman, R. J. Magn. Reson. 2004, 172, 330-333.
41. 1H) relaxation.
42. Pervushin, K.; Vogeli, B.; Eletsky, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12898-12902.
43. Atreya, H. S.; Szyperski, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 9642-9647.
44. (a) Kim, S.; Szyperski, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1385-1393.
45. (b) Kim, S.; Szyperski, T. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 28, 117-130.
46. For example, the projected chemical shift evolution periods can be scaled once with κ = 1.0 and once with κ = 0.9. The latter results in a compression of the chemical shift multiplets by 10% in the second data set and enables one to unambiguously identify all components belonging to the same chemical shift multiplet by comparison of the two data sets (see Figure 5 in ref 12).
47. Güntert, P.; Dötsch, V.; Wider, G.; Wüthrich, K. J. Biomol. NMR 1992, 2, 619-629.
48. Bartels, C.; Xia, T. H.; Billeter, M.; Güntert, P.; Wüthrich, K. J. Biomol. NMR 1995, 6, 1-10.
49. The structural biology will be published elsewhere (Atreya, H. S.; Shen, Y.; Yee, A.; Arrowsmith, C. H.; Szyperski, T.).
50. Wishart, D. S.; Sykes, B. D.; Richards, F. M. Biochemistry 1994, 31, 1647-1650.
51. Cornilescu, G.; Delaglio, F.; Bax, A. J. Biomol. NMR 1999, 13, 289-302.
52. Laskowski, R. A.; Rullmann, J. A.; MacArthur, M. W.; Kaptein, R.; Thornton, J. M. J. Biomol. NMR 1996, 8, 477-486.
53. Nabuurs, S. B.; Spronk, C. A. E. M.; Krieger, E.; Maassen, H.; Vriend, G.; Vuister, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12026-12034.
54. Shen, Y.; Atreya, H. S.; Xiao, R.; Acton, T. B.; Shastry, R.; Ma, L.; Montelione, G. T.; Szyperski, T. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 29, 549-550.
55. Skalicky, J. J.; Mills, J. L.; Sharma, S.; Szyperski, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 388-397.
56. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
57. l5N-resolved part.
58. (b) Sattler, M.; Maurer, M.; Schleucher, J.; Griesinger, C. J. Biomol. NMR 1995, 5, 97-102.
59. 3-CH3 NOEs (total: 29).
60. Koradi, R.; Billeter, M.; Wüthrich, K. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 51-55.
61. aliphatic, the minimal measurement time is ∼6.5 h at 600 MHz (i.e., about half of the minimal measurement time of the aliphatic congener; Table 2).
62. With such software, the precision and accuracy of the initial structure obtained with data set II (60 h measurement time; Table 4; Figures S2 and 8) can be expected be obtained with data set I (30 h measurement time).