Dynamic viscoelastic behavior of dental composites measured by Split Hopkinson pressure bar

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 234-240

  Tanimoto, Yasuhiro ^a   Nishiwaki, Tsuyoshi ^b   Nemoto, Kimiya ^a  

^a NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ASICS Corporation Kobe   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dental composite; Dynamic viscoelastic properties; Split Hopkinson pressure bar

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; ELASTICITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PARTICLE SIZE; VISCOSITY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; MATERIALS TESTING; PARTICLE SIZE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 33748946412     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.25.234     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Phillips RW. Skinner's science of dental materials, 7th ed, WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, 1973, p.232.
2. Yoshida Y, Shirai K, Shintani H, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, van Meerbeek B. Effect of presilanization filler decontamination on aesthetic and degradation resistance of resin composites. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 383-395.
3. Arksornnukit M, Takahashi H, Nishiyama N. Effect of silane coupling agent amount on mechanical properties and hydrolytic durability of composite resin after hot water storage. Dent Mater J 2004; 23: 31-36.
4. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 51-56.
5. Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA, Fonseca RG, Vaz LG. The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth. J Dent 2003; 31: 353-359.
6. Tanimoto Y, Nemoto K. Influence of particle size of fillers on frictional wear of dental composite resins. Compos Interface 2004; 11: 15-24.
7. Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composite. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 216-226.
8. Bayindir YZ, Yildiz M, Bayindir F. The effect of "soft-start polymerization" on surface hardness of two packable composites. Dent Mater J 2003; 22: 610-616.
9. Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Suzuki K. Flexural properties of eight flowable light-cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 239-249.
10. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Enamel micro-cracks produced around restorations with flowable composites. Dent Mater J 2005; 24: 83-91.
11. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1383-1390.
12. Yap AUJ, Lim LY, Yang TY, Ali A, Chung SM. Influence of dietary solvents on strength of nanofill and ormocer composites. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 129-133.
13. Fujii K, Tsukada G, Ueno O, Imaizumi A, Masuda A, Inoue K. Dynamic viscoelastic properties in torsion of four commercially available resins for crown and bridge. Dent Mater J 1998; 17: 205-212.
14. Fujii K, Arikawa H, Kanie T, Hamano T, Nishi Y, Nagaoka E. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of commercial glass-fibre reinforced resin used for crowns and bridges. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 827-834.
15. Sakaguchi RL, Shah NC, Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Borgersen SE. Dynamic mechanical analysis of storage modulus development in light-activated polymer matrix composites. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 197-202,
16. Papadogiannis Y, Boyer DB, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Lakes RS, Kapetanios C. Dynamic viscoelastic behavior of resin cements measured by torsional resonance. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 510-516.
17. Li Z, Lambros J. Determination of the dynamic response of brittle composites by the use of the split Hopkinson pressure bar. Compos Sci Technol 1999; 59: 1097-1107.
18. Ei-Magd E, Brodmann M. Influence of precipitates on ductile fracture of aluminium alloy AA7075 at high strain rates. Mater Sci Eng 2001; A307: 143-150.
19. Dai LH, Liu LF, Bai YL. Effect of particle size on the formation of adiabatic shear band in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Lett 2004; 58: 1773-1776.
20. He Z, Ma J, Wang H, Tan GEB, Shu D, Zheng J. Dynamic fracture behavior of layered alumina ceramics characterized by a split Hopkinson bar. Mater Lett 2005; 59: 901-904.
21. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, Berlin JS, Clelland N. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 307-313.
22. Yap AUJ, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 269-274.
23. Mousavi S, Welch K, Valdek U, Lundberg B. Non-equilibrium split Hopkinson pressure bar procedure for non-parametric identification of complex modulus. Int J Impact Eng 2005; 31: 1133-1151.
24. Chung SM, Yap AUJ, Tsai KT, Yap FL. Elastic modulus of resin-based dental restorative materials: A microindentation approach. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2005; 72B: 246-253.
25. Papadogiannis Y, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Lakes RS. Dynamic mechanical analysis of viscoelastic functions in packable composite resins measured by torsional resonance. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2004; 71B: 327-335.
26. Ersoy M, Civelek A, L'hotelier E, Say EC, Soyman M. Physical properties of different composites. Dent Mater J 2004; 23: 278-283.
27. Miguez PA, Pereira PNR, Foxton RM, Walter R, Nunes MF, Swift Jr. EJ. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in class I restorations. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 839-845.