Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: Color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 310-315

  Risko, Evan F ^a   Schmidt, James R ^b   Besner, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748790113     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193849     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BLAIS, C., & BESNER, D. (in press). Reverse Stroop effect with untranslated responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
2. BROWN, M., & BESNER, D. (2001). On a variant of Stroop's paradigm: Which cognitions press your buttons? Memory & Cognition, 29, 903-904.
3. COHEN, J. D., DUNBAR, K., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
4. DE HOUWER, J. (2003). On role role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 353-359.
5. DURGIN, F. H. (2003). Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 367-378.
6. FOX, L. A., SHOR, R. E., & STEINMAN, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 59-65.
7. GLASER, W. R., & GLASER, M. O. (1989). Context effect in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
8. KLEIN, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576-588.
9. KLOPFER, D. S. (1996). Stroop interference and color-word similarity. Psychological Science, 7, 150-157.
10. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
11. PROCTOR, R. W. (1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 413-419.
12. PSYCHOLOGY SOFTWARE TOOLS (2002). E-Prime [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
13. ROELOFS, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
14. SCHEIBE, K., SHAVER, P. R., & CARRIER, S. C. (1967). Color association values and response interference on variants of the Stroop test. Acta Psychologica, 26, 286-295.
15. SCHMIDT, J. R., & CHEESMAN, J. (2005). Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 132-138.
16. SEYMOUR, P. H. (1977). Conceptual encoding and locus of the Stroop effect Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 245-265.
17. SHARMA, D., & MCKENNA, F. P. (1998). Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks. Memory A Cognition, 26, 1033-1040.
18. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
19. SUGG, M. J., & MCDONALD, J. E. (1994). Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 647-675.
20. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier estimation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
21. ZHANG, H., & KORNBLUM, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 3-19.
22. ZHANG, H., ZHANG, J., & KORNBLUM, S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.