Crystal structure of the temperature-sensitive and allosteric-defective chaperonin GroELE461K

Journal of Structural Biology

Volumn 155, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 482-492

  Cabo Bilbao, Aintzane ^a   Spinelli, Silvia ^b   Sot, Begoña ^a   Agirre, Jon ^a   Mechaly, Ariel E ^a   Muga, Arturo ^a   Guérin, Diego M A ^a,c  

^a CSIC UPV Unidad de Biofisica UBF   (Spain)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Chaperonin; Co operativity; E461K; GroEL

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; MUTANT PROTEIN;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY;

ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; CHAPERONIN 60; CHAPERONINS; CRYSTALLIZATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROEL PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 33748761623     PISSN: 10478477     EISSN: 10958657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams P.D., Pannu N.S., Read R.J., and Brunger A.T. Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 5018-5023
2. Aharoni A., and Horovitz A. Inter-ring communication is disrupted in the GroEL mutant Arg 13 → Gly; Ala 126 → Val with known crystal structure. J. Mol. Biol. 258 (1996) 732-735
3. Bartolucci C., Lamba D., Grazulis S., Manakova E., and Heumann H. Crystal structure of wild-type chaperonin GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 354 (2005) 940-951
4. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hedge R., Boisvert D.C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A.L., and Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371 (1994) 578-586
5. Braig K., Adams P.D., and Brunger A.T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2 12 (1995) 1083-1094
6. Brunger A.T., Adams P.D., Clore G.M., DeLano W.L., Gros P., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Jiang J.S., Kuszewski J., Nilges M., Pannu N.S., Read R.J., Rice L.M., Simonson T., and Warren G.L. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D., Biol. Crystallogr. 54 (1998) 905-921
7. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994. The CCP4 Suite: Programs for Protein Crystallography. Acta Cryst. D 50, 760-763.
8. Ditzel L., Lowe J., Stock D., Stetter K.O., Huber H., Huber R., and Steinbacher S. Crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal chaperonin and homologue of CCT. Cell 93 (1998) 125-138
9. Gerstein, M., Richards, F.M., Chapman, M.S., Connolly, M. L., 2001. Molecular geometry and features in International Tables for Crystallography, F., 531-545.
10. Gromiha M.M., and Selvaraj S. Inter-residue interactions in the structure, folding, and stability of proteins. Res. Dev. Biophys. Chem. 1 (2000) 1-14 Recent Research
11. Inobe T., Kikushima K., Makio T., and Kuwajima K. The allosteric transition of GroEL induced by metal fluoride-ADP complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 23 329(1) (2003) 121-134
12. Jiang Z., Zhang L., Chen J., Xia A., and Zhao D. Effect of amino acid on forming residue-residue contacts in proteins. Polymer 43 (2002) 6037-6047
13. Jones T.A., Zou J.Y., Cowan S.W., and Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A47 (1991) 110-119
14. Kass I., and Horovitz A. Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 48 (2002) 611-617
15. Kleywegt, G.J., 1992-2005. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Uppsala Software Factory. Http://xray.bmc.uu.se/usf.
16. Lee B., and Richards F.M. The Interpretation of Protein Structures: Estimation of Static Accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55 (1971) 379-400
17. Llorca O., Marco S., Carrascosa J.L., and Valpuesta J.M. The formation of symmetrical GroEL-GroES complexes in the presence of ATP. FEBS Lett. 345 2-3 (1994) 181-186
18. Llorca O., Galán A., Carrascosa J.L., Muga A., and Valpuesta J.M. GroEL under heat-shock. Switching from a folding to a storing function. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 32587-32594
19. Manavalan P., and Ponnuswamy P.K. A study of the preferred environment of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 184 (1977) 476-478
20. Martin A., Toselli E., Rosier M., Auffray C., and Devignes M. Rapid and high efficiency site-directed mutagenesis by improvement of the homologous recombination technique. Nucleic Acids Res. 23 (1995) 1642-1643
21. Navaza J. AmoRe: an automated package for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. A50 (1994) 157-163
22. Otwinowky Z., and Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276 (1997) 307-326
23. Pérez-Pérez J., and Gutierrez J. An arabinose-inducible expression vector, pAR3, compatible with ColE1-derived plasmids. Gene (Amst). 158 (1995) 141-142
24. Ranson N.A., Farr G.W., Roseman A.M., Gowen B., Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L., and Saibil H.R. ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell 107 (2001) 869-879
25. Richards F.M. Calculation of molecular volumes and areas for structures of known geometry. Methods in Enzymology 115 (1985) 440-464
26. Sewell B.T., Best R.B., Chen S., Roseman A.M., Farr G.W., Horwich A.L., and Saibil H.R. A mutant chaperonin with rearranged inter-ring electrostatic contacts and temperature-sensitive dissociation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11 (2004) 1128-1133
27. Sot B., Galán A., Valpuesta J.M., Bertrand S., and Muga A. Salt bridges at the inter-ring interface regulate the thermostat of GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 34024-34029
28. Sot B., Bañuelos S., Valpuesta J.M., and Muga A. GroEL stability and function. J. Biol. Chem. 34 (2003) 32083-32090
29. Sot B., Von Germar F., Mantele W., Valpuesta J.M., Taneva S., and Muga A. Ionic interactions at both inter-ring contact sites of GroEL are involved in transmission of the allosteric signal. A time-resolved infrared difference study. Protein Sci. 14 9 (2005) 2267-2274
30. Wang J., and Boisvert D.C. Structural basis for GroEL-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 327 (2003) 843-855
31. Wang J., and Chen L. Domain motion in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide. J. Mol. Biol. 334 (2003) 489-499
32. Weissman J.S., Hohl C.M., Kovalenko O., Kashi W.A., Chen S., Braig K., Saibil H.R., Fenton W.A., and Horwich A.L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83 (1995) 577-588
33. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388 (1997) 741-750
34. Yifrach O., and Horovitz A. Nested Cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34 (1995) 5303-5308