Song variation in an avian ring species

Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 998-1010

  Irwin, Darren E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Complexity; Greenish warbler; Phylloscopus trochiloides; Plumbeitarsus; Ring species; Sexual selection; Song; Speciation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONG; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

CHINA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SIBERIA; TIBETAN PLATEAU;

ANIMALIA; AVES; PHYLLOSCOPUS TROCHILOIDES;

EID: 0033925892     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00099.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Badyaev, A. V., and E. S. Leaf. 1997. Habitat associations of song characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers. Auk 114: 40-46.
3. Bensch, S., and D. Hasselquist. 1992. Evidence for female choice in a polygynous warbler. Anim. Behav. 44:301-311.
4. Blair, W. F. 1955. Mating call and stage of speciation in the Mi-crohyla olivacea-M. carolinensis complex. Evolution 9:469-480.
5. Butlin, R. 1995. Genetic variation in mating signals and responses. Pp. 327-366 in D. M. Lambert and H. G. Spencer, eds. Speciation and the recognition concept. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.
6. Catchpole, C. K. 1980. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74:149-166.
7. _. 1982. The evolution of bird sounds in relation to mating and spacing behavior. Pp. 297-319 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Acoustic communication in birds. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.
8. _. 1987. Bird song, sexual selection, and female choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:94-97.
9. Catchpole, C. K., and P. J. B. Slater. 1995. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
10. Charif, R. A., S. Mitchell, and C. W. Clark. 1995. Canary 1.2 user's manual. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
11. Clayton, N. S. 1990. Assortative mating in zebra finch subspecies Taeniopygia guttata guttata and T. g. castonotis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 330:351-370.
12. Cramp, S., ed. 1992. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the western Palearctic. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
13. Cuthill, I. C., and W. A. MacDonald. 1990. Experimental manipulation of the dawn and dusk chorus in the blackbird Turdus merula. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26:209-216.
14. Darwin, C. R. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
15. Dementev, G. P., and N. A. Gladkov, eds. 1968. Birds of the Soviet Union. Vol. 6. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
16. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74:312-321.
17. Endler, J. A. 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139(S):125-153.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP (phylogenetics inference package). Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
19. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
20. Gerhardt, H. C. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47:959-969.
21. Handford, P., and S. C. Lougheed. 1991. Variation in duration and frequency characters in the song of the Rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, with respect to habitat, trill dialects and body size. Condor 93:644-658.
22. Hasselquist, D., S. Bensch, and T. von Schantz. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the Great Reed Warbler. Nature 381:229-232.
23. Hill, G. E. 1994. Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch - a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. 5:64-73.
24. Horn, A. G., and J. B. Falls. 1996. Categorization and the design of signals: the case of song repertoires. Pp. 121-135 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
25. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pp. 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
26. Howard, R. D. 1974. The influence of sexual selection and interspecific competition on mocking bird song (Mimus polyglottos). Evolution 28:428-438.
27. Hunter, M. L., and J. R. Krebs. 1979. Geographic variation in the song of the great tit (Parus major) in relation to ecological factors. J. Anim. Ecol. 48:759-785.
28. Irwin, D. E., P. Alström, U. Olsson, and Z. M. Benowitz-Fredericks. 2001. Cryptic species in the genus Phylloscopus (Old World leaf warblers). Ibis 143: In press.
29. Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski. 1995. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 377:420-422.
30. Jones, G. 1997. Acoustic signals and speciation: the roles of natural and sexual selection in the evolution of cryptic species. Adv. Study Behav. 26:317-354.
31. Kirkpatrick, M. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:43-70.
32. Kroodsma, D. E. 1976. Reproductive development in a female songbird: differential stimulation by quality of male song. Science 192:574-575.
33. Kroodsma, D. E., and R. A. Canady. 1985. Differences in repertoire size, singing behavior, and associated neuroanatomy among marsh wren populations have a genetic basis. Auk 102:439-446.
34. Marchetti, K. 1998. The evolution of multiple male traits in the yellow-browed leaf warbler. Anim. Behav. 55:361-376.
35. Martens, J. 1980. Lautäußerungen, verwandtschaftliche Beziehungen und Verbreitungsgeschichte asiatischer Laubsänger (Phylloscopus). Advances in Ethology, no. 22. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin.
36. Martens, J., and S. Eck. 1995. Towards an ornithology of the Himalayas: systematics, ecology and vocalizations of Nepal birds. Bonner Zoologische Monographien, no. 38. Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Ger-many.
37. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Dover Publications, New York.
38. Miller, E. H. 1996. Acoustic differentiation and speciation in shore-birds. Pp. 241-257 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
39. Mitchell, S., S. Cunningham, J. McClellan, and J. Montgomery. 1995. Canary 1.2. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
40. Møller, A. P., F. De Lope, and J. M. Caballero. 1995. Foraging costs of a tail ornament - experimental evidence from two populations of barn swallows Hirundo rustica with different degrees of sexual size dimorphism. Behav. Ecol. Soc. Biol. 37:289-295.
41. Morton, E. S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat. 109:17-34.
42. Nyström, K. G. 1997. Food density, song rate, and body condition in territory-establishing willow warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus). Can. J. Zool. 75:47-58.
43. Paterson, H. E. H. 1985. The recognition concept of species. Pp. 21-34 in E. S. Vrba, ed. Species and speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph no. 4. Pretoria, South Africa.
44. Price, T. 1991. Morphology and ecology of breeding warblers along an altitudinal gradient in Kashmir, India. J. Anim. Ecol. 60: 643-664.
45. _. 1999. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Pp. 93-112 in A. E. Magurran and R. M. May, eds. Evolution of biological diversity. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
46. Price, T. D., A. J. Helbig, and A. D. Richman. 1997. Evolution of breeding distributions in the Old World leaf warblers (genus Phylloscopus). Evolution 51:552-561.
47. Read, A. F., and D. M. Weary. 1992. The evolution of bird song: comparative analyses. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 338:165-187.
48. Reid, M. L. 1987. Costliness and reliability in the singing vigour of Ipswich sparrows. Anim. Behav. 35:1735-1744.
49. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Sexual selection and signal evolution - the ghost of biases past. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 340:187-195.
50. Salomon, M. 1989. Song as a possible reproductive isolating mechanism between two parapatric forms. The case of the Chiffchaffs Phylloscopus c. collybita and P. c. brehmii in the Western Pyrenees. Behaviour 111:270-290.
51. Schluter, D., and T. Price. 1993. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 253:117-122.
52. Searcy, W. A., and K. Yasukawa. 1996. Song and female choice. Pp. 454-473 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
53. Slater, P. J. B. 1981. Chaffinch song repertoires: observations, experiments and a discussion of their significance. Z. Tierpsychol. 56:1-24.
54. Sorjonen, J. 1986. Factors affecting the structure of song and the singing behaviour of some Northern European passerine birds. Behaviour 98:286-304.
55. Stebbins, R. C. 1949. Speciation in salamanders of the plethodontid genus Ensatina. Univ. Calif. Pub. Zool. 48:377-526.
56. Ticehurst, C. B. 1938. A systematic review of the genus Phylloscopus. Trustees of the British Museum, London.
57. Uetz, G. W., and G. E. Stratton. 1982. Acoustic communication and reproductive isolation in spiders. Pp. 123-159 in P. N. Witt and J. S. Rovner, eds. Spider Communication. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
58. Van Buskirk, J. 1997. Independent evolution of song structure and note structure in American wood warblers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 264:755-761.
59. Vehrencamp, S. L. 1999. Handicap, index, and conventional signal elements of bird song. Pp. 159-182 in Y. Espmark, T. Amundsen, and G. Rosenqvist, eds. Adaptive significance of signalling and signal design in animal communication. Proceedings of the fifth International Kongsvoll Symposium, Tapir Publishers, Trondheim, Norway.
60. Verrell, P. A., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Behavioral observations of sexual isolation among allopatric populations of the mountain dusky salamander, Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Evolution 43: 745-755.
61. Vrba, E. S. 1995. Species as habitat-specific, complex systems. Pp. 3-44 in D. M. Lambert and H. G. Spencer, eds. Speciation and the recognition concept. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.
62. Wake, D. B. 1997. Incipient species formation in salamanders of the Ensatina complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 7761-7767.
63. Wells, M. M., and C. S. Henry. 1998. Songs, reproductive isolation, and speciation in cryptic species of insects: a case study using green lacewings. Pp. 217-233 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
64. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-182.
65. Wiley, R. H. 1991. Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. Am. Nat. 138:973-993.
66. Wiley, R. H., and D. J. Richards. 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. Pp. 131-182 in D. H. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Acoustic communication in birds. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.
67. Williamson, K. 1962. Identification for ringers. 2. The genus Phylloscopus. British Trust for Ornithology, Oxford, U.K.