Habitat selection, acoustic adaptation, and the evolution of reproductive isolation

Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 2144-2155

  Patten, Michael A ^a,b,c   Rotenberry, John T ^a   Zuk, Marlene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecotone; Gene flow; Hybrid zone; Mate choice; Melospiza melodia; Signaling; Song sparrow; Speciation

Indexed keywords

BIOACOUSTICS; HABITAT SELECTION; HYBRID ZONE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SONORAN DESERT; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

FALLAX; MELOSPIZA; MELOSPIZA MELODIA; RIPARIA;

EID: 7544232754     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01593.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aldrich, J. W. 1984. Ecogeographical variation in size and proportions of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Ornithol. Monogr. 35.
2. Arcese, P., A. B. Marr, C. Hill, and M. A. Patten. 2002. Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). No. 704 in A. F. Poole and F. B. Gill, eds. The birds of North America. Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia, and Am. Ornithol. Union, Washington, DC.
3. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
4. Baker, M. C., and A. E. M. Baker. 1988. Vocal and visual stimuli enabling copulation behavior in female buntings. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23:105-108.
5. _. 1990. Reproductive isolation of female buntings: isolating mechanisms in a hybridizing pair of species. Evolution 44: 332-338.
6. Balloux, F., H. Brunner, N. Lugon-Moulin, J. Hausser, and J. Goudet. 2000. Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution 54:1414-1422.
7. Barton, N. H. 1988. Speciation. Pp. 185-218 in A. A. Myers and P. S. Giller, eds. Analytical biogeography: an integrated approach to the study of animal and plant distributions. Chapman and Hall, London.
8. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-148.
9. _. 1989. Adaptation, speciation, and hybrid zones. Nature 341:497-503.
10. Beecher, M. D., S. E. Campbell, and P. K. Stoddard. 1994. Correlation of song learning and territory establishment strategies in the song sparrow. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1450-1454.
11. Borgia, G. 1995. Complex male display and female choice in the spotted bowerbird: specialized functions for different bower decorations. Anim. Behav. 49:1291-1301.
12. Bradbury, J. W., and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
13. Bronson, C. L., T. C. Grubb, Jr., and M. J. Braun. 2003. A test of endogenous and exogenous hypotheses for the maintenance of a narrow avian hybrid zone. Evolution 57:630-637.
14. Brown, T. J., and P. Handford. 1996. Acoustic signal amplitude patterns: a computer simulation investigation of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Condor 98:608-623.
15. Catchpole, C. K., and P. J. B. Slater. 1995. Birds song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
16. Chan, Y., and P. Arcese. 2002. Subspecific differentiation and conservation of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) in the San Francisco Bay region inferred by microsatellite loci analysis. Auk 119:641-657.
17. Clarke, A. L, B.-E. Saether, and E. Røskaft. 1997. Sex biases in avian dispersal: a reappraisal. Oikos 79:429-438.
18. Daniel, J. C., and D. T. Blumstein. 1998. A test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in four species of marmots. Anim. Behav. 56:1517-1528.
19. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton Monogr. Popul. Biol. 10.
20. Freeman, D. C., H. Wang, S. Sanderson, and E. D. McArthur. 1999. Characterization of a narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata, Asteraceae). VII. Community and demographic analysis. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 487-502.
21. Feuer, E. J., and L. G. Kessler. 1989. Test statistic and sample size for a two-sample McNemar test. Biometrics 45:629-636.
22. Forrest, T. G. 1994. From sender to receiver: propagation and environmental effects on acoustic signals. Am. Zool. 34:644-654.
23. Fry, A. J., and R. M. Zink. 1998. Geographic analysis of nucleotide diversity and Song Sparrow (Aves: Emberizidae) population history. Mol. Ecol. 7:1303-1313.
24. Gee, J. M. 2003. How a hybrid zone is maintained: behavioral mechanisms of interbreeding between California and Gambel's quail (Callipepla californica and C. gambelii). Evolution 57: 2407-2415.
25. _. 2004. Gene flow across a climatic barrier between hybridizing avian species, California and Gambel's quail (Callipepla californica and C. gambelii). Evolution 58:1108-1121.
26. Hanotte, O., C. Zanon, A. Pugh, C. Greig, A. Dixon, and T. Burke. 1994. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in a passerine bird: the reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus. Mol. Ecol. 3:529-530.
27. Hansen, P. 1979. Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long distance propagation and a hypothesis on its evolution. Anim. Behav. 27:1270-1271.
28. Harrison, R. G., ed. 1993. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
29. Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 1989. Principles of population genetics. 2d ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
30. Howard, D. J. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40:34-43.
31. Irwin, D. E., and J. H. Irwin. 2002. Circular overlaps: rare demonstrations of speciation. Auk 119:596-602.
32. Irwin, D. E., J. H. Irwin, and T. D. Price. 2001. Ring species as bridges between microevolution and speciation. Genetica 112-113:223-243.
33. Jeffery, K. J., L. F. Keller, P. A. Arcese, and M. W. Bruford. 2001. The development of microsatellite loci in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia (Aves), and genotyping errors associated with good quality DNA. Mol. Ecol. Notes 1:11-13.
34. Lynch, A. 1996. The population mimetics of bird song. Pp. 181-197 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock Publishing, Ithaca, NY.
35. Marascuilo, L. A., and R. C. Serlin. 1979. Tests and contrasts for comparing change parameters for a multiple sample McNemar data model. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 32:105-112.
36. Martens, J. 1996. Vocalizations and speciation of Palearctic birds. Pp. 221-240 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock Publishing, Ithaca, NY.
37. Maxwell, A. E. 1970. Comparing the classification of subjects by two independent judges. Brit. J. Psych. 116:651-655.
38. McNaught, M. K., and I. P. F. Owens. 2002. Interspecific variation in plumage colour among birds: species recognition or light environment? J. Evol. Biol. 15:505-514.
39. Moore, W. S. 1977. An analysis of narrow vertebrate hybrid zones. Q. Rev. Biol. 52:263-277.
40. Moore, W. S., and J. T. Price. 1993. The nature of selection in the northern flicker hybrid zone and its implications for speciation theory. Pp. 196-225 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
41. Morton, E. S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat. 109:17-34.
42. _. 1986. Predictions from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long distance signals in birds. Behaviour 99:65-86.
43. Neslon, D. A. 2000. A preference for own-subspecies' song guides vocal learning in a song bird. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13348-13353.
44. Nowicki, S., S. Peters, and J. Podos. 1998. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am. Zool. 38: 179-190.
45. O'Loghlen, A. L., and M. D. Beecher. 1997. Sexual preferences for mate song types in female song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 53: 835-841.
46. Patten, M. A., and P. Unitt. 2002. Diagnosability versus mean differences of sage sparrow subspecies. Auk 119:26-35.
47. Patten, M. A., G. McCaskie, and P. Unitt. 2003. Birds of the Salton Sea: status, biogeography, and ecology. Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley, CA.
48. Patten, M. A., R. A. Erickson, and P. Unitt. 2004. Population changes and biogeographic affinities of the birds of the Salton Sink, California/Baja California. Stud. Avian Biol. 27:24-32.
49. Petren, K. 1998. Microsatellite primers from Geospiza fortis and cross-species amplification in Darwin's finches. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1771-1788.
50. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
51. Rand, D. M., and R. G. Harrison. 1989. Ecological genetics of a mosaic hybrid zone: mitochondrial, nuclear, and reproductive differentiation of crickets by soil type. Evolution 43:432-449.
52. Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637-1653.
53. Ryan, M. J., W. Rand, P. L. Hurd, S. M. Phelps, and A. S. Rand. 2003. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals. Am. Nat. 161:380-394.
54. Saloman, M. 2001. Evolutionary biogeography and speciation: essay on a synthesis. J. Biogeogr. 28:13-27.
55. Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:372-380.
56. Schneider, C. J., T. B. Smith, B. Larison, and C. Moritz. 1999. A test of alternative models of diversification in tropical rainforests: ecological gradients versus rainforest refugia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:13869-13873.
57. Searcy, W. A. 1992. Measuring responses of female birds to male song. Pp. 175-189 in P. K. McGregor, ed. Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum Press, New York.
58. Searcy, W. A., S. Nowicki, and M. Hughes. 1997. The response of male and female song sparrows to geographic variation in song. Condor 99:651-657.
59. Searcy, W. A., S. Nowicki, and S. Peters. 2003. Phonology and geographic song discrimination in song sparrows. Ethology 109: 23-35.
60. Slabbekoorn, H., and T. B. Smith. 2002. Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56: 1849-1858.
61. Slater, P. J. B. 1986. The cultural transmission of bird song. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1:94-97.
62. Slatkin, M. 1985. Rare alleles as indicators in gene flow. Evolution 39:53-65.
63. Smith, G. T., E. A. Brenowitz, M. D. Beecher, and J. C. Wingfield. 1997. Seasonal changes in testosterone, neural attributes of song control nuclei, and song structure in wild songbirds. J. Neurosci. 17:6001-6010.
64. Smith, T. B., R. K. Wayne, D. J. Girman, and M. W. Bruford. 1997. A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 276:1855-1857.
65. Smith, T. B., C. J. Schneider, and K. Holder. 2001. Refugial isolation versus ecological gradients. Genetica 112-113:383-398.
66. Uetz, G. W., and J. A. Roberts. 2002. Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav. Evol. 59:222-230.
67. Welsh, H. H., Jr. 1994. Bioregions: an ecological and evolutionary perspective and a proposal for California. Calif. Fish and Game 80:97-124.
68. Wiley, R. H., and D. G. Richards. 1978. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications of the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3: 69-94.
69. Wright, T. F., and M. Dorin. 2001. Pair duets in the yellow-naped Amazon (Psittaciformes: Amazona auropalliata): responses to playbacks of different dialects. Ethology 107:111-124.
70. Zink, R. M., and D. L. Dittmann. 1993. Gene flow, refugia, and evolution of geographic variation in the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 47:717-729.
71. Zink, R. M., and J. V. Remsen, Jr. 1986. Evolutionary processes and patterns of geographic variation in birds. Curr. Ornithol. 4: 1-69.