Prefix identification in the reading of Dutch bisyllabic words

Reading and Writing

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 651-668

  Verhoeven, Ludo ^a   Schreuder, Robert ^a   Haarman, Vera ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dutch orthography; Lexical decision; Morphological processing; Prefix identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748665754     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-005-1912-0     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Assink, E. M. H., Vooijs, C., & Knuijt, P. P. N. A. (2000). Prefixes as access units in visual word recognition: A comparison of Italian and Dutch data. Reading and Writing, 12, 149-168.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM, Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic DataConsortium.
3. Brown, P., Lupker, S. J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 537-554.
4. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169-190.
6. Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177-195.
7. Colombo, L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 987-1003.
8. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
9. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 77-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Kooij, J. G. (1994). Dutch. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The major languages of Western Europe. (pp. 139-156). London: Routledge.
11. Laudanna, A., & Burani, C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 345-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Leong, C. K. (2000). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling. Reading and Writing, 12, 169-190.
13. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223-232.
14. Nagy, W., Diakidoy, I., & Anderson, R. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meaning of derivates. Journal of reading Behavior, 25, 155-170.
15. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition. (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are nonsemantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processing, 15, 445-485.
17. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
18. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342-364.
19. Reitsma, P., & Verhoeven, L. (1990). Acquisition of reading in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.
20. Schaerlaekens, A., Kohnstamm, D., & Lejaegere, M. (1999). Streeflijst woordenschat voor zesjarigen. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
21. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1994). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 357-375.
22. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp. 131-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353-361.
24. Staphorsius, G., Krom, R., & Geus, K. de (1988). Frequenties van woordvormen en letterposities in jeugdliteratuur. Arnhem: Cito.
25. Torgeson, J. T. (2001). The theory and practice of intervention: comparing outcomes from prevention and remediation studies. In A. Fawcett (Ed.), Dyslexia, theory and good practice. (pp. 203-217). London: Whurr.
26. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
27. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
28. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Phonological mediation in skilled and dyslexic reading. In C. H. Chase, G. D. Rosen & G. F. Sherman (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia: Neural, cognitive and genetic mechanisms. (pp. 185-223). Timonium, MD: York Press.
29. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The role of morphology in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 209-271.
30. Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2003). Units of analysis in reading Dutch bisyllabic pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 255-271.