Binocular visual performance after LASIK

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 679-688

  Jiménez, José Ramón ^a,d   Villa, Cesar ^b   González Anera, Rosario ^a   Gutiérrez, Ramón ^c   Jiménez Del Barco, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b Clínica de Oftalmología Novovisión   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HALO EFFECT; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION INDEX; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL SUMMATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

EID: 33748589434     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081-597x-20060901-09     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:S596-S601.
2. Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, Navarro R, Llorente L, Barbero S. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1396-1403.
3. Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, Rowland HC, El Danasoury MA. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:1-7.
4. Applegate RA, Hilmantel G, Howland HC, Tu EY, Starck T, Zayac EJ. Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:507-514.
5. Holladay JT, Dudeja DR, Chang J. Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing, and corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:663-669.
6. Gutierrez R, Jimenez JR, Villa C, Valverde JA, Anera RG. Simple device for quantifying the influence of halos after LASIK surgery. J Biomed Opt. 2003;8:663-667.
7. Montes-Mico R, Espana E, Menezo JL. Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:353-356.
8. Anera RG, Jimenez JR, Jimenez del Barco L, Bermudez J, Hita E. Changes in corneal asphericity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:762-768.
9. Chan JW, Edwards MH, Woo GC, Woo VC. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. One-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1774-1779.
10. Boxer Wachler BS. Effect of pupil size on visual function under monocular and binocular conditions in LASIK and non-LASIK patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:275-278.
11. Howard IP, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
12. Schor C, Heckmann T. Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: effects on stereopsis and fusion. Vision Res. 1989;29:837-847.
13. Pardhan S, Gilchrist J. The effect of monocular defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990;10:33-36.
14. Reading RW. Binocular Vision: Foundations and Applications. London, England: Butterworth Publishers; 1983.
15. Legras R, Hornain V, Monot A, Chateau N. Effect of induced anisometropia on binocular through-focus contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:503-509.
16. Jimenez JR, Anera RG, Jimenez R, Salas C. Impact of interocular differences in corneal asphericity on binocular summation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:279-284.
17. Anera RG, Jimenez JR, Jimenez del Barco L, Hita E. Changes in corneal asphericity after laser refractive surgery, including . reflection losses and nonnormal incidence upon the anterior cornea. Opt Lett. 2003;28:417-419.
18. Holladay JT, Janes JA. Topographic changes in corneal asphericity and effective optical zone after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:942-947.
19. Atchison DA, Smith G. Optics of the Human Eye. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000.
20. Pardhan S. A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:252-255.
21. Jimenez JR, Medina JM, Jimenez del Barco L, Diaz JA. Binocular summation of chromatic changes as measured by visual reaction time. Percept Psychophys. 2002;64:140-147.
22. Blake R, Fox R. The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation. Percept Psychophys. 1973;14:161-165.
23. Montes-Mico R, Charman WN. Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity function after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:646-651.
24. Perez-Santonja JJ, Sakla HF, Alio JL. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:183-189.
25. Mutyala S, McDonald MB, Scheinblum KA, Ostrick MD, Brint SF, Thompson H. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1864-1867.
26. Campbell FW, Green DG. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nature. 1965;208:191-192.
27. Simmons DR, Kingdom FA. On the binocular summation of chromatic contrast. Vision Res. 1998;38:1063-1071.
28. Jimenez JR, Valero E, Anera RG, Martinez JA, Salas C. Chromatic changes in relation to binocular summation determined with contrast thresholds. Color Research and Application. 2003;28:366-370.
29. Williams DR, Yoon GY, Guirao A, Hoer H, Porter J. How far can we extend the limits of human vision? In: MacRae SM, Krueger RR, Applegate RA, eds. Customized Corneal Ablation: The Quest for Super Vision. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc; 2001:11-34.
30. Krueger RR, Applegate RA, MacRae SM. Wavefront Customized Visual Correction: The Quest for Super Vision II. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc; 2004.
31. Quesnel NM, Lovasik JV, Ferremi C, Boileau M, Ieraci C. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1209-1218.
32. Pardhan S. A comparison of binocular summation in young and older patients. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:315-319.
33. Lee YC, Hu FR, Wan IJ. Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis: influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:769-777.
34. Helgesen A, Hjortdal J, Ehlers N. Pupil size and night vision disturbances after LASIK for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:454-460.
35. Medina JM, Jimenez JR, Jimenez del Barco L. The effect of pupil size on binocular summation at suprathreshold conditions. Curr Eye Res. 2003;26:327-334.
36. Blake R, Levinson E. Spatial properties of binocular neurons in the human visual system. Exp Brain Res. 1977;27:221-232.
37. Smallman HS, MacLeod DI. Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994;11:2169-2183.
38. Prince SJ, Eagle RA. Stereo correspondence in one-dimensional Gabor stimuli. Vision Res. 2000;40:913-924.
39. Jimenez JR, Anera RG, Jimenez del Barco L, Carretero L. Retinal image quality in myopic subjects after refractive surgery. Journal of Modern Optics. 2000;47:1587-1598.
40. Jimenez JR, Anera RG, Jimenez del Barco L. Effects on visual function of approximations of the corneal-ablation profile during refractive surgery. Appl Opt. 2001;40:2200-2205.
41. Jimenez JR, Anera RG, Jimenez del Barco L. Equation for corneal asphericity after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:65-69.
42. Jimenez JR, Anera RG, Jimenez del Barco L, Hita E. Effect on laser-ablation algorithms of reflection losses and nonnormal incidence on the anterior cornea. Applied Physics Letters. 2002;81:1521-1523.
43. Roberts C. Biomechanical customization: the next generation of laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2-5.
44. Anera RG, Villa C, Jimenez JR, Gutierrez R, Jimenez del Barco L. Differences between real and predicted corneal shapes after aspherical corneal ablation. Appl Opt. 2005;44:4528-4532.