The effect of pupil size on binocular summation at suprathreshold conditions

Current Eye Research

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 327-334

  Medina, J M ^a,b   Jimenez J R ^a   Jimenez Del Barco L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Artificial pupil; Binocular summation; Luminance; Visual reaction time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL ORGAN; ARTIFICIAL PUPIL; BINOCULAR VISION; CASE REPORT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; REACTION TIME; RETINA; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; LIGHTING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PUPIL; REACTION TIME; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0042668454     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/ceyr.26.5.327.15434     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Blake R, Fox R. The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation. Percept Psych. 1973;14:161-185.
2. Blake R, Sloane M, Fox, R. Further developments in binocular summation. Percept Psych. 1981;30:266-276.
3. Jiménez JR, Rubiño M, Díaz JA, Hita E, Jiménez del Barco L. Changes in stereoscopic depth perception caused by decentration of spectacle lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2000; 77:421-427.
4. Solomons H. Binocular Vision. A Programmed Text. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd; 1978; 234-244.
5. Distler C, Hoffmann KP. The pupillary light reflex in normal and innate microstrabismic cats. II: Retinal and cortical input to the nucleus pretectalis olivaris. Vis Neurosci. 1989b;3:139-153.
6. Lui F, Gregory KM, Blanks RHI, Giolli RA. Projections from visual areas of the cerebral cortex to pretectal nuclear complex, terminal accessory optic nuclei and superior colliculus in macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1995;363: 439-460.
7. Reeves P. Rate of pupillary dilation and contraction. Psychol Rev. 1918;25:330-340.
8. Thomson LC. Binocular summation within the nervous pathways of the pupillary light reflex. J Physiol. 1947;106:59-65.
9. Atchinson DA, Smith G. Optics of the Human Eye. Oxford, Butterwoth-Heinemann, 2000;23-24.
10. Sireteanu R. Binocular luminance summation in humans with defective binocular vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:349-355.
11. Collier G. Probability of response and intertrial association as functions of monocular and binocular stimulation. J Exp Psychol. 1954;47:75-83.
12. Forbes LM, Mote FM. A comparison of the variability of binocular and monocular threshold measurements during dark adaptation in the human eye. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956;49:431-436.
13. Campbell FW, Green DG. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nature. 1965;208:191-192.
14. Westendorf DH, Fox R. Binocular detection of positive and negative flashes. Percept Psych. 1974;15:61-65.
15. Trick GL, Guth LS. The effect of wavelength on binocular summation. Vis Res. 1980;20:975-980.
16. Thorn F, Boynton RM. Human binocular summation at absolute threshold. Vis Res. 1973;14:445-458.
17. Westendorf DH, Blake R. Binocular reaction times to contrast increments. Vis Res. 1988;28:355-359.
18. Banton T, Levi MD. Binocular summation in vernier acuity. J Opt Soc Am A. 1991;8:673-680.
19. Bearse JRMA, Freeman RD. Binocular summation in orientation discrimination depends on stimulus contrast and duration. Vis Res. 1994;34:19-29.
20. Young RSL, Hang BCH, Wu PY. Transient and sustained components of the pupillary responses evoked by luminance and color. Vis Res. 1993;33:437-446.
21. Mansfield RJW. Latency stimulus in human vision. Vis Res. 1973;13:2219-2234.
22. Ueno T. Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels. Vis Res. 1977;17:227-232.
23. Lennie PL. The physiological basis of variations in visual latency. Vis Res. 1981;21:815-824.
24. Lema SA, Blake R. Binocular summation in normal and stereoblind humans. Vis Res. 1977;17:691-695.
25. Blake R, Martens W, Di Gianfilippo A. Reaction time as a measure of binocular interaction in human vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980;19:930-941.
26. Simmons DR, Kingdom FAA. On the binocular summation of chromatic contrast. Vis Res. 1998;38:1063-1071.
27. Legge GE. Binocular contrast summation. II: Quadratic summation. Vis Res. 1984b;24:385-394.
28. Miller J. Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Percept Psych. 1986;40:331-343.
29. Ueno T. Sustained and transient properties of chromatic and luminance systems. Vis Res. 1992;32:1055-1065.
30. Jiménez JR, Rubiño M, Hita E, Jiménez del Barco L. Influence of the luminance and opponent chromatic channels on stereopsis with random-dot stereograms. Vis Res. 1997;37:591-596.
31. Jiménez JR, Medina JM, Jiménez del Barco L, Díaz JA. Binocular summation of chromatic changes as measured by visual reaction time. Percept Psych. 2002;64:140-147.
32. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. Color Science. Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982;105-107.
33. Eriksen CW. A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets. Percept Psych. 1988;44:191-193.
34. Mordkoff JT, Miller J. Redundant gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency. Percept Psych. 1993;53:527-535.
35. Mordkoff JT, Yantis S. An interactive race model of divided attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991;17: 520-538.
36. Gilliand K, Haines RF. Binocular summation and peripheral visual response time. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975;52:834-839.
37. Haines RF. Visual response time to colored stimuli in peripheral retina: evidence for binocular summation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977;6:387-398.
38. Deiber MP, Ibañez V, Sadato N, Hallet M. Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: A positron emission tomography study. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:233-247.
39. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991;175-228.
40. Minucci PK, Connors MM. Reaction time under three viewing conditions: Binocular, dominant eye, and non-dominant eye. J Exp Psychol. 1964;67:268-275.
41. Distler C, Hoffmann KP. The pupillary light reflex in normal and innate microstrabismic cats. I: Behavior and receptive-fields analysis in the nucleus pretectal olivaris. Vis Neurosci. 1989a;3:127-138.
42. Legge GE, Rubin GS. Binocular interactions in suprathreshold contrast perception. Percept Psych. 1981;30:49-61.
43. Legge GE. Binocular contrast summation. I: Detection and discrimination. Vis Res. 1984a;24:373-383.
44. Anderson PA, Movshon JA. Binocular combination of contrast signals. Vis Res. 1989;29:1115-1132.
45. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling, WT. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1986; 105-116.
46. Pardhan S. A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:252-255.
47. Woodhouse JM. The effect of pupil size on grating detection at various contrast levels. Vis Res. 1975;15:645-648.
48. Rockefeller SLY, Kennish J. Transient and sustained components of the pupil response evoked by achromatic spatial patterns. Vis Res. 1993;33:2239-2252.
49. Dinse HRO, Kruger K. Contribution of area 19 to the foreground-background-interaction of the cat: An analysis based on single cell recordings and behavioural experiments. Exp Brain Res. 1990;82:107-122.