Impact of interocular differences in corneal asphericity on binocular summation

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 135, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 279-284

  Jiménez Cuesta, José Ramón ^a   Gonzalez Anera, Rosario ^a   Jiménez, Raimundo ^a   Salas, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DEVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KERATOMETRY; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; HUMANS; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0037374144     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01968-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Howard I.P., Rogers B.J. Binocular vision and stereopsis. 1995;349-359 Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Schor C., Heckmann T. Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency effects on stereopsis and fusion . Vision Res. 29:1989;837-847.
3. Pardhan S., Gilchrist J. The effect of monocular defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity function. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 10:1990;33-36.
4. Reading R.W. Binocular vision: foundations and applications. 1983;43-65 Butterworth, London.
5. Legras R., Hornain V., Monot A., Chateau N. Effect of induced anisometropia on binocular through-focus contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 78:2001;503-509.
6. Wali N., Leguire L.E., Rogers G.L., Bremer D.L. CSF interocular interactions in childhood ambylopia. Optom Vis Sci. 68:1991;81-87.
7. Atchison D.A., Smith G. Optics of the human eye. 2000;Butterworth-Heinemann, New York.
8. Carney L.G., Mainstone J.C., Henderson B.A. Corneal topography and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 38:1997;311-318.
9. Kiely P.M., Smith G., Carney L.G. The mean shape of the human cornea. Optica Acta. 29:1982;1027-1040.
10. Campbell F.W., Green D.G. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nature. 208:1965;191-192.
11. Home R. Binocular summation a study of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and recognition . Vision Res. 18:1978;579-585.
12. Simmons D.R., Kingdom F.A.A. On the binocular summation of chromatic contrast. Vision Res. 38:1998;1063-1071.
13. Rohaly A.M., Wilson H.R. Disparity averaging across spatial scales. Vision Res. 34:1994;1315-1325.
14. Marr D. Vision. 1980;WH Freeman and Co, San Francisco.
15. Jiménez J.R., Anera R.G., Jiménez del Barco L. Effects on visual function by approximations of corneal-ablation profile during refractive surgery. Appl Opt. 40:2001;2200-2205.
16. Holladay J.T., Dudeja D.R., Chang J. Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitiity, glare testing, and corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 25:1999;663-669.
17. Holladay J.T., Janes J.A. Topographic changes in corneal asphericity and effective optical zone after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2002;942-947.
18. Boxer Wachler B.S., Huynh V.N., El-Shiaty A.F., Goldberg D. Evaluation of corneal functional optical zone after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2002;948-953.
19. Schwiegerling J., Snyder R.W. Corneal ablation patterns to correct for spherical aberration in photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 20:2000;214-221.
20. Manns F., Ho A., Patel J.M., Culbertson W. Ablation profiles for wavefront-guided correction of myopia and primary spherical aberration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2002;766-774.
21. Gatinel D., Malet J., Hoang-Xuan T., Azar D.T. Analysis of customized corneal ablations theoretical limitations of increasing negative asphericity . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43:2002;941-948.
22. MacRae S.M., Krueger R.R., Applegate R.A. What is customization? MacRae S.M., Krueger R.R., Applegate R.A. Customized corneal ablation: the quest for supervision. 2001;3-9 SLACK, Thorofare, NJ.