Open microscopy environment and findspots: Integrating image informatics with quantitative multidimensional image analysis

BioTechniques

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 199-208

  Schiffmann, David A ^a   Dikovskaya, Dina ^a   Appleton, Paul L ^a   Newton, Ian P ^a   Creager, Douglas A ^b   Allan, Chris ^a   Näthke, Inke S ^a   Goldberg, Ilya G ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DRUG PRODUCTS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEDICAL IMAGING;

DIGITAL MICROSCOPE IMAGES; DIGITAL MICROSCOPY; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; OPEN MICROSCOPY ENVIRONMENT (OME);

OPTICAL MICROSCOPY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CENTROMERE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FACTUAL DATABASE; FIBROBLAST; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METABOLISM; MOUSE; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

4',6 DIAMIDINO 2 PHENYLINDOLE; BUB1 SPINDLE CHECKPOINT PROTEIN; FLUORESCENT DYE; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; PROTEIN KINASE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FIBROBLASTS; FLUORESCENT DYES; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INDOLES; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; KINETOCHORES; MICE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PROTEIN KINASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33748582263     PISSN: 07366205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2144/000112224     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Harding, A. 2006. Seeing is believing. Scientist 20:46-51.
2. Biel, S., R. Wepf, and P. Schwarb. 2005. Multimodal imaging in life science requires intelligent digital data management. G.I.T. Imaging and Microscopy 4/05:45-47.
3. Hogan, H. 2005. Where's that picture? Biophotonics International July:32-36.
4. Eliceiri, K.W. and C. Rueden. 2005. Tools for visualizing multidimensional images from living specimens. Photochem. Photobiol. 81:1116-1122.
5. Swedlow, J.R., I. Goldberg, E. Brauner, and P.K. Sorger. 2003. Informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging. Science 300:100-102.
6. Goldberg, I.G., C. Allan, J.M. Burel, D. Creager, A. Falconi, H. Hochheiser, J. Johnston, J. Mellen, et al. 2005. The Open microscopy environment (OME) data model and XML file: open tools for informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging. Genome Biol. 6:R47.
7. Andrews, P.D., I.S. Harper, and J.R. Swedlow. 2002. To 5-D and beyond: quantitative fluorescence microscopy in the postgenomic era. Traffic 3:29-36.
8. Platani, M., I. Goldberg, A.I. Lamond, and J.R. Swedlow. 2002. Cajal body dynamics and association with chromatin are ATP-dependent. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:502-508.
9. Platani, M., I. Goldberg, J.R. Swedlow, and A.I. Lamond. 2000. In vivo analysis of Cajal body movement, separation, and joining in live human cells. J. Cell Biol. 151:1561-1574.
10. Jesch, S.A., A.J. Mehta, M. Velliste, R.F. Murphy, and A.D. Linstedt. 2001. Mitotic Golgi is in a dynamic equilibrium between clustered and free vesicles independent of the ER. Traffic 2:873-884.
11. Castleman, K.R. 1996. Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
12. Young, I.T., J.J. Gerbrands, and L.J. van Vliet. 1998. Fundamentals of image processing. In V.K. Madisetti and D.B. Williams (Eds.), The Digital Signal Processing Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
13. th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
14. Zhou, J., D. Panda, J.W. Landen, L. Wilson, and H.C. Joshi. 2002. Minor alteration of microtubule dynamics causes loss of tension across kinetochore pairs and activates the spindle checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 277:17200-17208.
15. Seul, M., L. O'Gorman, and M.J. Sammon. 2000. Practical Algorithms for Image Analysis with CD-ROM: Description, Examples and Code. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
16. Petrou, M. and P. Bosdogianni. 1999. Image Processing: The Fundamentals. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.
17. Sage, D., F.R. Neumann, F. Hediger, S.M. Gasser, and M. Unser. 2005. Automatic tracking of individual fluorescence particles: application to the study of chromosome dynamics. IEEE Trans Image Process. 14:1372-1382.
18. Bacher, C.P., M. Reichenzeller, C. Athale, H. Herrmann, and R. Eils. 2004. 4-D single particle tracking of synthetic and proteinaceous microspheres reveals preferential movement of nuclear particles along chromatin-poor tracks. BMC Cell Biol. 5:45.
19. Girish, V. and A. Vijayalakshmi. 2004. Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/ ImageJ. Indian J. Cancer 41:47.
20. Howell, B.J., B. Moree, E.M. Farrar, S. Stewart, G. Fang, and E.D. Salmon. 2004. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14:953-964
21. Jablonski, S.A., G.K. Chan, C.A. Cooke, W.C. Earnshaw, and T.J. Yen. 1998. The hBUB1 and hBUBR1 kinases sequentially assemble onto kinetochores during prophase with hBUBR1 concentrating at the kinetochore plates in mitosis. Chromosoma 107:386-396.
22. Zhou, J., J. Yao, and H.C. Joshi. 2002. Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Sci. 115:3547-3555.
23. Masuda, A. and T. Takahashi. 2002. Chromosome instability in human lung cancers: possible underlying mechanisms and potential consequences in the pathogenesis. Oncogene 21:6884-6897.
24. Shah, J.V., E. Botvinick, Z. Bonday, F. Furnari, M. Berns, and D.W. Cleveland. 2004. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr. Biol. 14:942-952.
25. Fearnhead, N.S., M.P. Britton, and W.F. Bodmer. 2001. The ABC of APC. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:721-733.
26. Nathke, I.S. 2004. The adenomatous polyposis coli protein: the Achilles heel of the gut epithelium. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20:337-366.
27. Green, R.A. and K.B. Kaplan. 2003. Chromosome instability in colorectal tumor cells is associated with defects in microtubule plus-end attachments caused by a dominant mutation in APC. J. Cell Biol. 163:949-961.
28. Dikovskaya, D., I.P. Newton, and I.S. Nathke. 2004. The adenomatous polyposis coli protein is required for the formation of robust spindles formed in CSF Xenopus extracts. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:2978-2991.
29. Tighe, A., V.L. Johnson, and S.S. Taylor. 2004. Truncating APC mutations have dominant effects on proliferation, spindle checkpoint control, survival and chromosome stability. J. Cell Sci. 117:6339-6353.
30. Kaplan, K.B., A.A. Burds, J.R. Swedlow, S.S. Bekir, P.K. Sorger, and I.S. Nathke. 2001. A role for the adenomatous polyposis coli protein in chromosome segregation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:429-432.
31. Kapoor, T.M., T.U. Mayer, M.L. Coughlin, and T.J. Mitchison. 2000. Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5. J. Cell Biol. 150:975-988.
32. Milligan, G. 2003. High-content assays for ligand regulation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Drug Discov. Today 8:579-585.
33. Mitchison, T.J. 2005. Small-molecule screening and profiling by using automated microscopy. ChemBioChem 6:33-39.
34. Monk, A.J. 2005. Faster, surer prediction. Harnessing automated microscopy for drug discovery. Biochemist October: 25-28.
35. Tukey, J.W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.