Experimental design of total disk replacement - Experience with a prospective randomized study of the SB Charitè

Spine

Volumn 28, Issue 20 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  McAfee, Paul C ^a   Fedder, Ira L ^b   Saiedy, Samer ^b   Shucosky, Erin M ^b   Cunningham, Bryan W ^b  

^a Scoliosis and Spine Center   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Lumbar disc replacement; Prospective randomized trial; SB Charit prosthesis; Spinal arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DISABILITY; DISKOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

EID: 0142121541     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000092217.34981.e1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Buttner-Janz K, McAfee PC, Hochschuler SH. The Artificial Disk. Springer-Verlag; 2003.
2. Lemaire JP, Shalli W, Laveste F, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop 1997;337:64-76.
3. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques. A prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar spine study group. Spine 2002;27:1131-41.
4. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of the disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996;8:995-1000.
5. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K, et al, A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the Link SB Charitè intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 1994;19:1842-9.
6. Zeegers WS, Bohen LMLJ, Laaper M, et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charitè III. 2 year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999;8:210-7.
7. McAfee, PC. Artificial disc prosthesis. The Link SB Charitè, in Spinal Restabilization Procedures. Kaech DL, Jinkins JR, eds. Elsevier Science B.V.; 2002:299-310.
8. McAfee PC, Lee GA, Fedder IL, et al. Anterior BAK instrumentation and fusion: complete versus partial diskectomy. Clin Orthop 2002;389:55-63.
9. Gertzbein SD, Seligman J, Holtby R, et al. Centrode characteristics of the lumbar spine as a function of segmental instability. Clin Orthop 1986;208:48-51.
10. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL, et al. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, techniques, and 2-year follow up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial. Spine 1998;23:1267-78.
11. McAfee PC. Symposium: a critical discrepancy - a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions. Spine 2001;26:320-34.
12. Yukawa Y, Lenke LG, Tenhula J, et al. A Comprehensive Study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84A:1954-9.
13. Burkus JK, Transfeldt E, Kitchell SH, et al. A prospective randomized study assessing the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with rhBMP-2 and threaded cortical bone dowels in the lumbar spine. Presented at NASS meeting; 2000; New Orleans, Louisiana: 114.
14. McKay B, Sandu HS. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 in spinal fusion applications. Spine 2002;27:S66-S85.
15. Zdeblick TA, Heim SE, Kleeman TJ, et al. Laparoscopic approach with tapered metal cages: rhBMP-2 vs. autograft. Presented at the NASS meeting; 2001:200.
16. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine JD, et al. Classification of Heterotopic Ossification (HO) in Artificial Disk Replacement. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society in Montreal Canada. The Spine J 2002;2:94S.
17. Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C, et al. The value of patient flow charts in reports of randomized controlled trials: bibliographic study. JAMA 2001;285:1996-9.
18. Cunningham BW, Lowery GL, Gonzales V, et al. An analysis of the Acroflex lumbar Disc prosthesis. A non-human primate model. Proceedings of the North American Spine Society; November 3, 2001; Seattle, Washington:74-5.
19. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Orbegoso CM, et al. Analysis of porous ingrowth in intervertebral disc prostheses. A non-human primate model. Spine 2003;28:332-40.
20. Szmukler-Moncler S, Perin S, Ahossi V, et al. Evaluation of BONIT, a fully resorbable CaP coating obtained by electrochemical deposition, after 6 weeks of heating. A pilot study in the pig maxilla. Biological Mechanisms of Tooth Eruption, Resorption, and Replacements by Implants. Davidovitch Z, Mah J, eds. 1998:481-5.
21. Devaine PA, Robinson EJ, Bourne RB, et al. Measurement of polyethylene wear in acetabular components inserted with and without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79A:682-9.
22. Link HD. History, design, and biomechanics of the Link SB Charitè artificial disk. Eur Spine 2002;11:S98-S105.
23. Cunningham BW, Orbegoso CM, Dmitriev AE, et al. The effect of titanium particulate on the development and maintenance of a posterolateral spinal arthrodesis: an in vivo rabbit model. Spine 2002;18:1971-81.
24. Cunningham BW, Orbegoso CM, Dmitriev AE, et al. The effect of spinal instrumentation particulate wear debris: an in vivo rabbit model and applied clinical study of retrieved instrumentation cases. The Spine J 2002;2:69S-70S.
25. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, et al. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop 2001;388:41-50.