The temporal nature of IS benefits: A longitudinal study

Information and Management

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 75-79

  Jurison, Jaak ^a  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

IS evaluation; IS impacts; Longitudinal research; Organizational effectiveness

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; OFFICE AUTOMATION; PRODUCTIVITY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; USER INTERFACES;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTEGRATED OFFICE INFORMATION SYSTEM; ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0030142025     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0378-7206(95)00050-X     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Attewell P. and J. Rule, "Computing in Organizations: What We Know and What We Don't Know," Communications of ACM, December 1984, pp. 1184-1192.
2. Berger, P., J.G. Kobielus and D.A. Sutherland (Eds.), Measuring Business Value of Information Technology, International Center for Information Technologies, Washington, DC, 1988.
3. Brynjolfson, E., "The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology," Communications of ACM, December 1993, pp. 67-77.
4. DeLone W.H. and E.R. McLean, "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1992, pp. 60-95.
5. Dickson G. and G. DeSantis, "The Management of Information Systems: Research Status and Themes," in: A.M. Jenkins et al. (Eds.), Research Issues in Information Systems: An Agenda for the 1990s, Wm. Brown, Dubuque, IO, 1990.
6. Huff, S.L., M.C. Munro and B.H. Martin, "Growth Stages of End-User Computing," Communications of the ACM, May 1988, pp. 542-550.
7. Keen, P.G.W., Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1991.
8. Markus, M.L., "Toward a 'critical mass' theory of interactive media," Communications Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1987, pp. 491-511.
9. Markus M.L. and D. Robey, "Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research," Management Science, May 1988, pp. 583-599.
10. Mohr, L.B., Explaining Organizational Behavior, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1982.
11. Olson M.H. and H.C. Lucas Jr., "The Impact of Office Automation on the Organization: Some Implications for Research and Practice," Communications of ACM, May 1982, pp. 838-847.
12. Rogers, E.M., Diffusions of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, NY, 1983.
13. Steers, R.M., "When is an Organization Effective? A Process Approach to Understanding Effectiveness," Organizational Dynamics, Autumn 1976, pp. 50-63.
14. Weill P. and M.H. Olson, "An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems," Journal of Management Information Systems, Summer 1989, pp. 59-85.
15. Wilson, D., "Assessing the Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Performance," in: R.D. Banker, R.J. Kauffman and R.J. Mahmood (Eds.), Strategic Information Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA, 1993.
16. Zisman, M.D., "Office Automation: Revolution or Evolution?," Sloan Management Review, Spring, 1978, pp. 1-16.