Perceptual issues in the use of head-mounted visual displays

Human Factors

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 555-573

  Patterson, Robert ^a   Winterbottom, Marc D ^b   Pierce, Byron J ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY DEVICES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTERNET; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VISION;

HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYS (HMD); INTERNET SEARCH; VISUAL SUPPRESSION;

HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS;

BRIGHTNESS; CONTRAST; HEAD MOVEMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OPTICS; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; VISION; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

COMPUTER TERMINALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; UNITED STATES; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748475954     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872006778606877     Document Type: Review

References (138)

1. Allison, R. S., Howard, I. P., & Zacher, J. E. (1999). Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room. Perception, 28, 299-306.
2. Anand, S., & Bridgeman, B. (2002). An unbiased measure of the contributions of chroma and luminance to saccadic suppression of displacement. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 335-341.
3. Anderson, G., Vrana, C., Riegler, J., & Martin, E. (2002). Integration of a legacy system with NVTS (Tech. Rep. AFRL-HE-AZ-TR-2002-0069). Ft. Belvoir, VA: Air Force Research Laboratory.
4. Benson, A. J., & Barnes, G. R. (1978). Vision during angular oscillation: The dynamic interaction of visual and vestibular mechanisms. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 49, 340-345.
5. Blake, R. R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
6. Blake, R. R., & Boothroyd, K. (1985). The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 114-124.
7. Breese, B. B. (1899). On inhibition. Psychological Monographs, 3, 1-65.
8. Brickner, M. S., & Foyle, D. C. (1990). Field of view effects on a simulated flight task with head-down and head-up sensor imagery displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 1567-1571). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9. Burr, D. C., Morrone, C., & Ross, J. (2002). Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature, 371, 511-513.
10. Campbell, F. W. (1957). The depth of field of the human eye. Optica Acta, 4, 157-164.
11. Campbell, F. W., & Westheimer, G. (1960). Dynamics of accommodation responses of the human eye. Journal of Physiology, 151, 285-295.
12. Cho, S., & Lee, C. (2003). Expansion of visual space after saccadic eye movements. Journal of Vision, 3, 906-918.
13. Clapp, R. E. (1987). Field of view, resolution, and brightness parameters for eye limited displays. In C. Freeman (Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE: Imaging sensors and displays (Vol. 0765, pp. 10-18). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
14. Davis, E. T. (1997). Visual requirements in HMDs: What can we see and what do we need to see? In J. E. Melzer & K. Moffitt (Eds.), Head mounted displays: Designing for the user (pp. 207-248). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Diamond, M. R., Ross, J., & Morrone, M. C. (2000). Extraretinal con-trol of saccadic suppression. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3449-3455.
16. Draper, M., Viirre, E. S., Furness, T. A., & Gawron, V. (2001). Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43, 129-146.
17. Draper, M., Viirre, E. S., Furness, T. A., & Parker, D. E. (1997, May). Theorized relationship between vestibulo-ocular adaptation and simulator sickness in virtual environments. Presented at the International Workshop on Motion Sickness, Marbella, Spain.
18. Duh, H. B.-L., Lin, J. J. W., Kenyon, R. V., Parker, D. E., & Furness, T. A. (2001). Effects of field of view on balance in an immersive environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (pp. 235-240). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
19. Edgar, G. K., Pope, J. C., & Craig, I. (1993). Visual accommodation problems with head-up and helmet mounted displays. In C. T. Bartlett & M. D. Cowan (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Display systems: High-resolution and large screen displays and helmet, head-up, and head-down displays (Vol. 1988, pp. 100-107). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
20. Ehrlich, J. (1997). Simulator sickness and HMD configurations. In M. R. Stein (Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE: Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies IV (Vol. 3206, pp. 170-178). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
21. Ellis, S. R., Bucher, U. J., & Menges, B. M. (1995). The relationship of binocular convergence and errors in judged distance to virtual objects. In Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control (pp. 1-8). Boston, MA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
22. Epstein, W. (1997). Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley.
23. Fisher, R. E. (1994). Optics for head-mounted displays. Information Display, 10(7-8), 12-16.
24. Ferrin, F. J. (1991). Survey of helmet tracking technologies. In H. M. Assenheim, K. A. Flasck, T. M. Lippert, & J. Bentz (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Large screen projection, avionic, and helmet-mounted displays (Vol. 1456, pp. 86-94). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
25. Foley, J. M., Ribeiro-Filho, N. P., & Da Silva, J. A. (2004). Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space. Vision Research, 44, 147-156.
26. Frey, T. W., & Page, H. J. (2001). Virtual HUD using an HMD. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, H. J. Girolamo, & C. E. Rash (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays VI (Vol. 4361, pp. 251-262). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
27. Gleason, G. A., & Kenyon, R. V. (1997). The Mandelbaum effect may not be due to involuntary mis-accommodation [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, S983.
28. Grigby, S. S., & Tsou, B. H. (1994). Visual processing and partial-overlap head-mounted displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 2, 69-74.
29. Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2001). Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research, 41, 1475-1482.
30. Grossman, E. D., Donnelly, M., Price, P., Morgan, V., Pickens, D., Neighbor, G., et al. (2000). Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 711-720.
31. Grunwald, A. J., & Kohn, S. (1994). Visual field information in low-altitude visual flight and line-of-sight slaved helmet-mounted displays. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, 120-134.
32. Hakkinen, J. (2003, September 9). Ergonomics of head-worn virtual displays. Nokia Research and Venturing, pp. 1-4.
33. Hakkinen, J. (2004). A virtual display for mobile use. In Society for Information Display international symposium digest of technical papers. Vol. 35 (pp. 1586-1589). San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display.
34. Havig, P. R., Grigsby, S. S., Heft, E. L., LaCreta, J. M., & Post, D. L. (2001). Luminance contrast and color recognition in helmet-mounted displays. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, H. J. Girolamo, & C. E. Rash (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays VI (Vol. 4361, pp. 198-203). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
35. Hennessy, R. T., Iida, T., Shina, K., & Leibowitz, H. W. (1976). The effect of pupil size on accommodation. Vision Research, 16, 587-589.
36. Howard, I. P. (2002). Seeing in depth: Vol. 1. Basic mechanisms. New York: Porteous.
37. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2002). Seeing in depth: Vol. 2. Depth perception. New York: Porteous.
39. Huddleston, J. H. F. (1970). Tracking performance on a visual display apparently vibrating at one to ten Hertz. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 401-408.
40. Ivanoff, A. (1955). Night binocular convergence and night myopia. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 45, 769-770.
41. Jagacinski, R. J., & Flach, J. M. (2003). Control theory for humans: Quantitative approaches to modeling performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Jennings, S., & Craig, G. (2000). Effects of field-of-view on pilot performance in night vision goggles flight trials: Preliminary findings. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays V (Vol. 4021, pp. 335-342). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
43. Johnson, C. A. (1976). Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 66, 138-142.
44. Keller, K., & Colucci, D. (1998). Perception in HMDs: What is it in head mounted displays (HMDs) that really make them all so terrible? In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays III (Vol. 3362, pp. 46-53). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
45. Kenyon, R. V., & Kneller, E. W. (1993). The effects of field of view size on the control of roll motion. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23, 183-193.
46. Klymenko, V., Harding, T. H., Beasley, H. H., & Martin, J. S. (1999). The effect of helmet mounted display fold of view configurations on target acquisition (Tech. Rep. No. 99-19). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
47. Klymenko, V., Verona, R. W., Martin, J. S., & Beasley, H. H. (1994a). Convergent and divergent viewing affect luning, visual thresholds, and field of view fragmentation in partial binocular overlap helmet mounted displays. In R. J. Lewandowski, W. Stephens, & L. A. Haworth (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays and symbology design requirements (Vol. 2218, pp. 82-96). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
48. Klymenko, V., Verona, R. W., Martin, J. S., & Beasley, H. H. (1994b). Factors affecting the perception of luning in monocular regions of partial binocular overlap displays (Tech. Rep. No. 94-47). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
49. Kooi, F. (1997). Visual strain: A comparison of monitors and head-mounted displays. In J. Bares et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Imaging sciences and display technologies (Vol. 2949, pp. 162-171). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
50. Kruk, R., & Longridge, T. (1984). Binocular overlap in a fiber optic helmet mounted display. In Proceedings of the 1984 Image Conference III (pp. 363-378). CSA, Bethesda, MD: The IMAGE Society.
51. Kruk, R., & Runnings, D. (1989). Low level flight performance and air combat maneuvering performance in a simulator with a fiber optic helmet mounted display system. In Proceedings of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Conference (pp. 1989-1992). CSA, Bethesda, MD: The IMAGE Society.
52. Laramee, R., & Ware, C. (2002). Rivalry and interference with a head-mounted display. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9(3), 238-251.
53. Lee, R. A., & King, A. I. (1971). Visual vibration response. Journal of Applied Physiology, 30, 281-286.
54. Leibowitz, H. W., & Owens, D. A. (1975a). Anomalous myopias and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. Science, 189, 646-648.
55. Leibowitz, H. W., & Owens, D. A. (1975b). Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 65, 1121-1128.
56. Levelt, W. J. M. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, Netherlands: Institute for Perception, RVO-TNO.
57. Licina, J. R., Rash, C. E., Mora, J. C., & Ledford, M. H. (1999). Helmet-mounted display human factors engineering design issues: Past, present, and future. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays IV (Vol. 3689, pp. 32-43). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
58. Lin, J. J.-W., Duh, H. B. L., Parker, D. E., Abi-Rached, H., & Furness, T. A. (2002). Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (pp. 164-171). Los Alamitos, CA: Conference Publishing Service.
59. Lindholm, J., Pierce, B., & Scharine, A. (2001). Liquid-crystal displays and moving-image quality. In Proceedings of the 2001 Interservice/ Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (pp. 1-9). Arlington, VA: National Training Systems Association.
60. Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740-749.
61. Ljung, L., Morf, M., & Falconer, D. (1978). Fast calculation of gain matrices for recursive estimation schemes. International Journal of Control, 27, 1-19.
62. Long, J., & Wickens, C. D. (1994). Conformal versus non-conformal symbology and the head-up display. In R. J. Lewandowski, W. Stephens, & L. A. Haworth (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays and symbology design requirements (Vol. 2218, pp. 361-368). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
63. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475-501.
65. Martinsen, G. L., Havig, P. R., & Post, D.L. (2003). Human factors requirements of helmet trackers for HMDs. In C. E. Rash & C. E. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays VIII (Vol. 5079, pp. 95-103). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
66. McKee, S. P., & Welch, L. (1989). Is there a constancy for velocity? Vision Research, 29, 553-561.
67. Melzer, J. E. (1998). Overcoming the field of view: Resolution invariant in head mounted displays. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays III (Vol. 3362, pp. 284-293). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
68. Melzer, J. E., & Moffitt, K. (1991). An ecological approach to partial binocular overlap. In H. M. Assenheim, K. A. Flasck, T. M. Lippert, & J. Bentz (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Large screen projection, avionics, and helmet-mounted displays (Vol. 1456, pp. 124-131). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
69. Melzer, J. E., & Moffitt, K. (1997). HMD design - Putting the user first. In J. E. Melzer & K. Moffitt (Eds.), Head mounted displays: Designing for the user (pp. 1-16). New York: McGraw-Hill.
70. Meng, X., Chen, Y., & Qian, N. (2004). Both monocular and binocular signals contribute to motion rivalry. Vision Research, 44, 45-55.
71. Merhav, S. J., & Velger, M. (1991). Compensating sampling errors in the stabilization of helmet-mounted displays using auxiliary acceleration measurements. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14, 1067-1069.
72. Meyer, K., Applewhite, H. L., & Biocca, F. A. (1992). A survey of position trackers. Presence, 1, 173-200.
73. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74. Mon-Williams, M., Wann, J. P., & Ruston, S. (1993). Binocular vision in a virtual world: Visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthalmology and Physiological Optics, 13, 387-391.
75. Morphew, M., Shively, J., & Casey, D. (2004). Helmet mounted displays for unmanned aerial vehicle control. In C. E. Rash & C. E. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays IX: Technologies and applications (Vol. 5442, pp. 93-103). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
76. Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (1990). Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research, 30, 1811-1825.
77. Norman, H. F., Norman, J. F., & Bilotta, J. (2000). The temporal course of suppression during binocular rivalry. Perception, 29, 831-841.
78. Ogle, K. N. (1938). Induced size effect: I. A new phenomenon in binocular space-perception associated with the relative sizes of the images of the two eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology, 20, 604-623.
79. Ogle, K. N., & Schwartz, J. T. (1959). Depth of focus of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 49, 273-280.
80. Olano, M., Cohen, J., Mine, M., & Bishop, G. (1995). Combating rendering latency. In Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (pp. 19-21). New York: ACM Press.
81. Ono, H., & Comerford, T. (1977). Stereoscopic depth constancy. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 91-128). New York: Wiley.
82. Osgood, R. K., & Wells, M. J. (1991). The effect of field-of-view size on performance of a simulated air-to-ground night attack. In AGARD Symposium on Helmet Mounted Displays and Night Vision Goggles (AGARD Conference Proceedings 517, pp. 10.1-10.7). CSA, Bethesda, MD: The Image Society.
83. Owens, D. A. (1979). The Mandelbaum effect: Evidence for an accommodative bias toward intermediate viewing distances. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 646-652.
84. Owens, D. A., & Leibowitz, H. W. (1976). Oculomotor adjustments in darkness and the specific distance tendency. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 2-9.
85. Owens, D. A., & Leibowitz, H. W. (1980). Accommodation, convergence, and distance perception in low illumination. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 57, 540-550.
86. Padmos, P., & Milders, M. V. (1992). Quality criteria for simulator images: A literature review. Human Factors, 34, 727-748.
87. Palmer, J. (1999). Vision science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Patterson, R., & Martin, W. L. (1992). Human stereopsis. Human Factors, 34, 669-692.
89. Patterson, R., Moe, L., & Hewitt, T. (1992). Factors that affect depth perception in stereoscopic displays. Human Factors, 34, 655-667.
90. Peli, E. (1990). Visual issues in the use of a head-mounted monocular display. Optical Engineering, 29, 883-892.
91. Peli, E. (1998). The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Research, 38, 2053-2066.
92. Peuskens, H., Sunaert, S., Dupont, P., Van Hecke, P., & Orban, G. A. (2001). Human brain regions involved in heading estimation. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2451-2461.
93. Pierce, B. J., Arrington, K. F., & Moreno, M. A. (1999). Motion and stereoscopic tilt perception. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 3, 193-206.
94. Pierce, B. J., & Geri, G. A. (1997). Changes in perceived velocity with viewing distance [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38(Suppl.), S379.
95. Pierce, B. J., & Howard, I. P. (1997). Types of size disparity and the perception of surface slant. Perception, 26, 1503-1517.
96. Primeau, G. (2000). Wide field-of-view SVGA sequential color HMD for use in anthropomorphic telepresence applications. In R. J. Lewandowski, L. A. Haworth, & H. J. Girolamo (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays V (Vol. 4021, pp. 11-19). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
97. Rash, C. E., Kalich, M. E., & van de Pol, C. (2002). Solutions to helmet-mounted display visual correction compatibility issues. In C. E. Rash & C. E. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays VII (Vol. 4711, pp. 270-285). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
98. Rash, C. E., McLean, W., Mora, J., Ledford, M., Mozo, B., Licina, J., et al. (1998). Design issues for helmet-mounted display systems for rotary wing aviation (Tech. Rep. No. 98-32). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
99. Rash, C. E., Mozo, B. T., McEntire, B. J., & Licina, J. R. (1996). RAH-66 Comanche health hazard and performance issues for the helmet integrated display and sighting system (Tech. Rep. 97-1). Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.
100. Rensink, R., O'Regan, J., & Clark, J. (1995). Image flicker is as good as saccades in making large scene changes invisible. Perception, 24(Suppl.), 26-27.
101. Ritter, M. (1977). Effect of disparity and viewing distance on perceived depth. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 400-407.
102. Robinson, G. H., Koth, B. W., & Ringenbach, J. P. (1976). Dynamics of the eye and head during an element of visual search. Ergonomics, 19, 691-709.
103. Rock, I., Linnett, C., Grant, P., & Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502-534.
104. Rock, I., & Mack, A. (1994). Attention and perceptual organization. In S. Ballesteros (Ed.), Cognitive approaches to human perception (pp. 23-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
105. Rogers, P. J., & Freeman, M. H. (1992). Biocular display optics. In M. A. Karim (Ed.), Electro-optical displays (pp. 417-447). New York: Marcel Dekker.
106. Rogers, S. P., Asbury, C. N., & Szoboszlay, Z. P. (2003). Enhanced flight symbology for wide field-of-view helmet-mounted displays. In C. E. Rash & C. E. Reese (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet- and head-mounted displays VIII: Technologies and applications (Vol. 5079, pp. 321-331). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
107. Rolland, J., Ha, Y., & Fidopiastis, C. (2004). Albertian errors in head-mounted displays: I. Choice of eye-point location for a near- or far-field task visualization. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 21, 901-912.
108. Roska, B., Nemeth, E., Orzo, L., & Werblin, F. S. (2000). Three levels of lateral inhibition: A space-time study of the retina of the tiger salamander. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1941-1951.
109. Ruston, S., Mon-Williams, M., & Wann, J. P. (1994). Binocular vision in a bi-ocular world: New-generation head-mounted displays avoid causing visual deficit. Displays, 15, 255-260.
110. Schall, J. D., Nawrot, M., Blake, R., & Yu, K. (1993). Visual guided attention is neutralized when informative cues are visible but unperceived. Vision Research, 33, 2057-2064.
111. Schiller, P. H., Logothetis, N. K., & Charles, E. R. (1990). Role of the color opponent and broad-band channels in vision. Visual Neuroscience, 5, 321-346.
112. Sheedy, J., & Bergstrom, N. (2002). Performance and comfort on near-eye computer displays. Optometry and Vision Science, 79, 306-312.
113. Shibata, T. (2002). Head mounted display. Displays, 23, 57-64.
114. So, R. H. Y., & Griffin, M. J. (1992). Compensation lags in head-coupled displays using head position prediction and image deflection. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 29, 1064-1068.
115. Thiele, A., Henning, P., Kubischik, M., & Hoffmann, K. P. (2002). Neural mechanisms of saccadic suppression. Science, 295, 2460-2462.
116. Thilo, K. V., Santoro, L., Walsh, V., & Blakemore, C. (2004). The site of saccadic suppression. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 13-14.
117. Toates, F. M. (1972). Accommodation function of the human eye. Physiological Reviews, 52, 828-863.
118. Toates, F. M. (1974). Vergence eye movements. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 37, 153-214.
119. T'so, D. Y., & Roe, A. W. (1995). Functional compartments in visual cortex: Segregation and interaction. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 325-337). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
120. Tsou, B. H., & Shenker, M. (2000). Visual factors associated with head-mounted displays. In M. Bass (Ed.), Handbook of optics: Vol. III. Visual optics: Issues pertinent to the optical designer (2nd ed., pp. 18.1-18.15). New York: McGraw-Hill.
121. Van Essen, D. C., & DeYoe, E. A. (1995). Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 383-400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
122. Velger, M. (1998). Helmet-mounted displays and sights. Boston, MA: Artech House.
123. von Hofsten, C. (1976). The role of convergence in visual space perception. Vision Research, 16, 193-198.
124. Wallach, H. (1939). On constancy of visual speed. Psychological Review, 46, 541-552.
125. Wann, J. P., Ruston, S., & Mon-Williams, M. (1995). Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35, 2731-2736.
126. Weikhorst, L., & Vacarro, F. (1988). Field of view utilized in performing tactical maneuvers (Tech. Rep. AFHRL-TP-87-50). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
127. Wells, M. J., & Griffin, M. J. (1984). Benefits of helmet-mounted display image stabilization under whole-body vibration. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 55, 13-18.
128. Wells, M. J., & Griffin, M. J. (1987a). Flight trial of a helmet-mounted display image stabilization system. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 55, 319-322.
129. Wells, M. J., & Griffin, M. J. (1987b). A review and investigation of aiming and tracking performance with helmet-mounted sights. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-17, 210-221.
130. Wells, M. J., & Griffin, M. J. (1988). Tracking with the head during whole-body vibration. In J. Patrick & K. D. Duncan (Eds.), Training, human decision making and control (pp. 323-333). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science (North-Holland).
131. Wells, M. J., & Haas, M. W. (1990). Head movements during simulated air-to-air engagements. In R. R. Lewandowski (Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE: Helmet-mounted displays II (Vol. 1290, pp. 246-257). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
132. Wenzel, B., Castillo, A., & Baker, G. (2002). Assessment of the virtual environment safe-for-maintenance trainer (VEST) (Tech. Rep. No. AFRL-HE-AZ-TP-2002-0011). Mesa, AZ: Air Force Research Laboratory, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Warfighter Training Research Division.
133. Wetzel, P. A., Pierce, B. J., & Geri, G. A. (1996). Viewing distance and the perceived size of simulator imagery. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 4, 247-253.
134. Winterbottom, M. D., Geri, G. A., & Pierce, B. J. (2004). An integrated procedure for measuring the spatial and temporal resolution of visual displays. In Proceedings of the 2004 Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (pp. 1855:1-8). Arlington, VA: National Training System Association.
135. Wood, R. B. (1992). Holographic head-up displays. In M. A. Karim (Ed.), Electro-optical displays (pp. 337-415). New York: Marcel Dekker.
136. Yabuta, N. H., Sawatari, A., & Callaway, E. M. (2001). Two functional channels from primary visual cortex to dorsal visual cortical areas. Science, 292, 297-300.
137. Young, P. (1976). Some observations on instrumental variable methods of time series analysis. International Journal of Control, 23, 593-612.
138. Zohary, E., & Sittig, A. (1993). Mechanisms of velocity constancy. Vision Research, 33, 2467-2478.