Both monocular and binocular signals contribute to motion rivalry

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 45-55

  Meng, Xin ^a   Chen, Yuzhi ^a   Qian, Ning ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular motion; Binocular rivalry; Interocular motion; Interocular pairing; Monocular motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MONOCULAR VISION; MOTION; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0242384132     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andrews T.J., Blackmore C. Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry. Vision Research. 42:2002;301-309.
2. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular-rivalry. Psychological Review. 96(1):1989;145-167.
3. Blake R., Fox R., Mcintyre C. Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 88(3):1971;327-332.
4. Blake R., Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 3(1):2002;13-21.
5. Blaser E., Sperling G., Lu Z.L. Measuring the amplification of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 96(20):1999;11681-11686.
6. Bonneh Y., Sagi D., Karni A. A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research. 41(8):2001;981-989.
7. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;433-436.
8. Carney T., Shadlen M., Switkes E. Parallel processing of motion and colour information. Nature. 328(6131):1987;647-649.
9. De Marco A., Penengo P., Trabucco A. Stochastic models and fluctuations in reversal time of ambiguous figures. Perception. 6(6):1977;645-656.
10. Fox R., Herrmann J. Stochastic Properties of Binocular Rivalry Alternations. Perception and Psychophysics. 2(9):1967;432-436.
11. Howard I.P., Rogers B.J. Bionocular vision and stereopsis. 1995;Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology. 160:1962;106-154.
13. Kalarickal G.J., Marshall J.A. Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry. Neurocomputing. 32:2000;843-853.
14. Kovacs I., Papathomas T.V., Yang M., Feher A. When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 93(26):1996;15508-15511.
15. Lee S.H., Blake R. Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research. 39(8):1999;1447-1454.
16. Lehky S.R. An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception. 17(2):1988;215-228.
17. Lehky S.R. Binocular rivalry is not chaotic. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences. 259(1354):1995;71-76.
18. Lehky S.R., Maunsell J.H.R. No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys. Vision Research. 36(9):1996;1225-1234.
19. Leopold D.A., Logothetis N.K. Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature. 379(6565):1996;549- 553.
20. Levelt W.J.M. On binocular rivalry. 1965;Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, Soesterberg, Netherlands.
21. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1(4):1994;476-490.
22. Logothetis N.K., Leopold D.A., Sheinberg D.L. What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature. 380(6575):1996;621-624.
23. Logothetis N.K., Schall J.D. Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science. 245(4919):1989;761-763.
24. Lu Z.L., Sperling G. Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature. 377(6546):1995;237-239.
25. Lu Z.L., Sperling G. The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research. 35(19):1995;2697-2722.
26. Matsuoka K. The dynamic-model of binocular-rivalry. Biological Cybernetics. 49(3):1984;201-208.
27. Matthews N., Geesaman B.J., Qian N. The dependence of motion repulsion and rivalry on the distance between moving elements. Vision Research. 40(15):2000;2025-2036.
28. Meng, X., Chen, Y., Qian, N. (2002). Both monocular and binocular signals contribute to motion rivalry. Program No. 219.1. 2002 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner, Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2002. Online.
29. Mueller T.J. A physiological model of binocular-rivalry. Visual Neuroscience. 4(1):1990;63-73.
30. Nguyen V.A., Freeman A.W., Wenderoth P. The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception and Psychophysics. 63(2):2001;348-360.
31. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;437-442.
32. Polonsky A., Blake R., Braun J., Heeger D.J. Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience. 3(11):2000;1153-1159.
33. Qian N., Andersen R.A. Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. 2. Physiology. Journal of Neuroscience. 14(12):1994;7367-7380.
34. Sengpiel F., Blakemore C., Harrad R. Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: a possible neural basis of binocular rivalry. Vision Research. 35(2):1995;179-195.
35. Shadlen M., Carney T. Mechanisms of human motion perception revealed by a new cyclopean illusion. Science. 232(4746):1986;95-97.
36. Snowden R.J., Treue S., Erickson R.G., Andersen R.A. The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion. Journal of Neuroscience. 11(9):1991;2768-2785.
37. Srinivasan R., Russell D.P., Edelman G.M., Tononi G. Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. Journal of Neuroscience. 19(13):1999;5435-5448.
38. Stevenson S.B., Schor C.M. Human stereo matching is not restricted to epipolar lines. Vision Research. 37(19):1997;2717-2723.
39. Tong F., Engel S.A. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature. 411(6834):2001;195-199.
40. Valle-Inclan F., Hackley S.A., de Labra C., Alvarez A. Early visual processing during binocular rivalry studied with visual evoked potentials. Neuroreport. 10(1):1999;21-25.
41. van der Zwan R., Wenderoth P. Psychophysical evidence for area V2 involvement in the reduction of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocular rivalry. Visual Neuroscience. 11(4):1994;823-830.
42. van der Zwan R., Wenderoth P., Alais D. Reduction of a pattern-induced motion aftereffect by binocular rivalry suggests the involvement of extrastriate mechanisms. Visual Neuroscience. 10(4):1993;703-709.
43. Walker P. Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception and Psychophysics. 18(6):1975;467-473.
44. Westheimer G. Vertical disparity detection - is there an induced size effect. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 17(6):1978;545-551.