Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 147-156

  Foley, John M ^a   Ribeiro Filho, Nilton P ^b   Da Silva, José A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Geometry; Localization; Perception; Size; Space

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 0345306254     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aczel J., Boros Z., Heller J., Ng C.T. Functional equations in binocular space perception. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 43:1999;71-101.
2. Blank A.A. Analysis of experiments in binocular space perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 48:1958;911-925.
3. Blank A.A. Axiomatics of binocular vision: the foundations of metric geometry in relation to space perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 48:1958;328-334.
4. Blumenfeld W. Untersuchungen uber die scheinbare Grosse in Sehraume. Zeit. f. Psychologie u. Physiologie de Sinnesorgane. 65:1913;241-404.
5. Bock O. Localization of objects in the peripheral visual field. Behavioural Brain Research. 56:1993;77-84.
6. Boring E.G. Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. 1942;Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
7. Cuijpers R.H., Kappers A.M.L., Koenderink J.J. Investigation of visual space using an exocentric pointing task. Perception and Psychophysics. 62:2000;1556-1571.
8. Cutting J.E., Vishton P.M. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. Epstein W., Rogers S.J. Perception of space and motion. 1995;69-117 Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA, US.
9. Da Silva J.A. Scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: comparison of three psychophysical methods. American Journal of Psychology. 98:1985;119-144.
10. Foley J.M. Desarguesian property in visual space. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 54:1964;684-692.
11. Foley J.M. Depth, size and distance in stereoscopic vision. Perception and Psychophysics. 3:1968;265-274.
12. Foley J.M. Distance in stereoscopic vision: the three-point problem. Vision Research. 9:1969;1505-1521.
13. Foley J.M. Size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: implications for processing. Vision Research. 12:1972;323-332.
14. Foley J.M. Error in visually directed manual pointing. Perception and Psychophysics. 17:1975;69-74.
15. Foley J.M. Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception. 6:1977;449-460.
16. Foley J.M. Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review. 87(5):1980;411-434.
17. Foley J.M. Binocular distance perception: egocentric distance tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 11:1985;133-149.
18. Foley J.M. Binocular space perception. Regan D. Binocular vision. vol. 9:1991;75-92 Macmillan, London.
19. Foley J.M., Held R. Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction, and available cues. Perception and Psychophysics. 12:1972;263-268.
20. Gillam B. Geometrical illusions. Scientific American. 242(1):1980;102-111.
21. Gillam B. The perception of spatial layout from static optical information. Epstein W., Rogers S.J. Perception of space and motion. 1995;23-67 Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA, US.
22. Gogel W.C. Depth adjacency and cue effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 92:1972;176-181.
23. Gogel W.C. An analysis of perceptions from changes in optical size. Perception and Psychophysics. 60:1998;805-820.
24. Harvey L.O. Jr., Leibowitz H.W. Effects of exposure duration, cue reduction, and temporary monocularity in size matching at short distances. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 57:1967;249-253.
25. Heller J. Psychophysical invariances in binocular space perception. Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie. 205:1997;297-318.
26. Higashiyama A. The 3- and 4-point experiments and a test of homogeneity in binocular visual space. Japanese Journal of Psychology. 47:1976;149-157.
27. Higashiyama A. The effects of familiar-size cue on children's judgments of size and distance. Japanese Journal of Psychology. 53:1982;259-265.
28. Indow T. On geometry of frameless binocular perceptual space. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient. 17:1974;50-63.
29. Indow T. A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space. Psychological Review. 98:1991;430-453.
30. Indow T. Hyperbolic representation of global structure of visual space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 41:1997;89-98.
31. Kaufman L. Sight and mind: an introduction to visual perception. 1974;Oxford University Press, New York.
32. Khuri A., Cornell J. Response surfaces: designs and analysis. 1987;Marcel Dekker, New York.
33. Koenderink J.J., Van Doorn A.J., Kappers A.M.L. Pappus in optical space. Perception and Psychophysics. 64:2002;380-391.
34. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Lappin J.S. Direct measurement of the curvature of visual space. Perception. 29:2000;69-79.
35. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research. 35:1995;389-412.
36. Levin C.A., Haber R.N. Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance. Perception and Psychophysics. 54:1993;250-259.
37. Loomis J.M., Da Silva J.A., Fujita N., Fukusima S.S. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18:1992;906-921.
38. Luneburg R.K. Mathematical analysis of binocular vision. 1947;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, US.
39. Luneburg R.K. The metric of binocular visual space. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 40:1950;627-642.
40. Norman J.F., Todd J.T., Perotti V.J., Tittle J.S. The visual perception of three-dimensional length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;173-186.
41. Pastore N. Selective history of theories of visual perception: 1650-1950. 1971;Oxford University Press, New York.
42. Todd J.T., Oomes A.H.J., Koenderink J.J., Kappers A.l.M. On the affine structure of perceptual space. Psychological Science. 12:2001;191-196.
43. Toye R.C. The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of scenes. Perception and Psychophysics. 40:1986;85-92.
44. Wagner M. The metric of visual space. Perception and Psychophysics. 38:1985;483-495.
45. Westheimer G., Levi D.M. Depth attraction and repulsion of disparate foveal stimuli. Vision Research. 27(8):1987;1361-1368.
46. Woodworth R.S., Schlosberg H. Experimental psychology. 1954;Henry Holt and Company, New York.