Rivalry and Interference with a Head-Mounted Display

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 238-251

  Laramee, Robert S ^a   Ware, Colin ^b  

^a FEDERAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING CENTRE FOR FORESTS   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

augmented reality; binocular rivalry; head mounted display; heads up display; Human Factors; mobile computing devices; see thru Display; visual interference; Wearable computing

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013812393     PISSN: 10730516     EISSN: 15577325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/568513.568516     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alais, D. and Blake, R. 1999. Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vis. Res., 4341-4353
2. Blackwood, W. O., Anderson, T. R., Bennett, C. T., Corson, J. R., Endsley, M. R., Hancock, P. A., Hochberg, J., Hoffman, J. E., and Kruk, R. V. 1997. Tactical displays for soldiers: Human factors considerations. Panel on Human Factors in the Design of Tactical Display Systems for the Individual Soldier (panel chair Blackwood), National Research Council, National Academy Press, Chapter 4
3. Blake, R. 2000. What can be “perceived” in the absence of visual awareness?
4. Blake, R., Westendorf, D., and Fox, R. 1990. Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry. Percept. Psychophys. 48, 6, 593-602
5. Breese, B. B. 1899. On inhibition. Psychol. Monograph 3, 1-65
6. Collins, J. F. and Blackwell, L. K. 1974. Effects of eye dominance and retinal distance on binocular rivalry. Percept. Motor Skills 39, 747-754
7. Ellerbrock, V. J. and Loran, D. F. C. 1995. Limited occlusion and hyperphoria. Am. J. Optom. 38, 359-369
8. Feiner, S., Macintyre, B., Hollerer, T., and Webster, A. 1997. A touring machine: Prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC 97), 13-14
9. Harrison, B. L. and Vicente, K. J. 1996. An experimental evaluation of transparent menu usage. In Proceedings of CHI 96 (April), 391-398
10. Harrison, B. L., Ishii, H., Vicente, K. J., and Buxton, W. A. S. 1995. Transparent layered user interfaces: An evaluation of a display design to enhance focused and divided attention. In Proceedings of CHI 95 (May), 317-324
11. Laramee, R. S. and Ware, C. 2001. Visual interference with a head mounted display. In Proceedings of CHI 2001 (April), Extended Abstracts, 323-324
12. Lee, S.-H. and Blake, R. 1999. Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vis. Res., 1447-1454
13. Leigh, R. J. and Zee, D. S. 1983. Eye-head coordination. Neurol. Eye Movements 70, 109-124
14. Mazumder, S., Drury, C. G., and Helander, M. G. 1997. Binocular rivalry as an aid in visual inspection. Hum. Factors 39, 4, 642-650
15. Meenes, M. 1930. A phenomenological description of retinal rivalry. Am. J. Psychol. 42, 260-269
16. Mon-Williams, M., Wann, J. P., and Rushton, S. 1993. Binocular vision in a virtual world:Visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Opthalm. Physiolog. Optics 13, 3, 387391
17. Morphew, G. R. 1985. Transcript of open forum session. In Aircraft Attitude Awareness Workshop Proceedings (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH), G. B. McNaughton, Ed., Flight Dynamics Laboratory
18. Ockerman, J. J. and Pritchett, A. R. 1998. Preliminary investigation of wearable computers for task guidance in aircraft inspection. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC, Calif., Oct.), 33
19. Peli, E. 1990. Visual issues in the used of a head mounted monocular display. Opt. Eng. 29, 883-892
20. Peli, E. 1998. The visual effects of head mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of the desk-top computer display. Vis. Res. 38, 2053-2066
21. Peli, E. 1999. Optometric and perceptual issues with head-mounted display (HMD). In Optical Design for Visual Instrumentation, P. Mouroulis, Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York
22. Rolland, J. P., Biocca, F. A., Barlow, T., and Kancherla, A. 1995. Quantification of adaptation to virtual eye location in see-thru head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual Symposium, 56-66
23. Roscoe, S. N. 1993. The eyes prefer real images. In Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments, S. R. Ellis, M. K. Kaiser, and A. J. Grunwald, Eds, Taylor and Francis, Washington, D.C
24. Rosenfield, M. and Ciuffreda, K. J. 1994. Cognitive demand and transient nearwork-induced myopia. Optom. Vis. Sci. 71, 381-385
25. Rush, C. E., Verona, R. W., and Crowley, J. S. 1990. Human factors and safety considerations of night vision systems flight using thermal imaging systems. Tech. Rep. 90-10, U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory
26. Sethi, B. 1986. Heterophoria: A vergence adaptive position. Opthalm. Physiol. Optics 6,151-156
27. Sohmiya, T. and Sohmiya, K. 1986. Periodicity of strength of pattern in binocular rivalry. Percept. Motor Skills 62, 943-950
28. Starner, T., Mann, S., Rhodes, J., Levine, J., Healey, D., and Picard, R. 1997. Augmented reality through wearable computing. In Presence 6, 386-398
29. Sunkpho, J., Jr., J. H. G., Smailagic, A., and Siewiorek, D. P. 1998. Mia: A wearable computer for bridge inspectors. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC, Calif. Oct.), 160-167
30. Systems, I. D. 2001. i-glasses
31. Thomas, B., Demczuk, V., Piekarski, W., Hepworth, D., and Gunther, B. 1998. A wearable computer system with augmented reality to support terrestrial navigation. in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC Calif. Oct.), 168
32. Uemura, T., Aral, Y., and Shimazaki. 1980. Eye-head coordination during lateral gaze in normal subjects. Acta Otololaryngology, 90-91
33. Wolfe, J. M. 1984. Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vis. Res. 24, 471-478