Dialogue on Dialogue

Evaluation

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 164-180

  Abma, Tineke A ^a   Greene, Jennifer C ^b   Karlsson, Ove ^c   Ryan, Katherine ^b   Schwandt, Thomas A ^b   Widdershoven, Guy A M ^d  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

cautions; conceptualization of dialogue; issues of concern; participants in dialogue; relevance of dialogue; role of the evaluator

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347483647     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/135638900100700202     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Where we refer to House and Howe we have the following work in mind: House, E. R. and K. R. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2000) Essay written for the panel on ‘Dialogue and/in Evaluation’ at the Fourth Conference of the European Evaluation Society: Taking Evaluation to the People, Lausanne, 12–14 October.
3. Where we refer to Gadamer we have the following work in mind: Gadamer, H.-G. (1960) Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: Mohr.
4. Where we refer to Bakhtin we have the following work in mind: Bakhtin, M. (1953/1980) The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5. Where we refer to Buber we have the following works in mind: Buber, M. (1961)Between Man and Man. London: Collins.
6. Where we refer to Bohm we have the following work in mind: Bohm, D. (1996) On Dialogue. London: Routledge.
7. Where we refer to Habermas we have the following work in mind: Habermas, J. (1991) Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
8. Abma, T. A. (1998) ‘Storytelling as Inquiry in a Mental Hospital’, Qualitative Health Research 8(6): 821–38.
9. Smith, D. (1987) The Everyday World as a Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
10. Ryan, K. (2000) Essay written for the panel on ‘Dialogue and/in Evaluation’ at the Fourth Conference of the European Evaluation Society: Taking Evaluation to the People, Lausanne, 12–14 October.
11. Abma, T. A. (2000) Essay written for the panel on ‘Dialogue and/in Evaluation’ at the Fourth Conference of the European Evaluation Society: Taking Evaluation to the People, Lausanne, 12–14 October.
12. Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2000) Personal letter in response to Abma.
13. Bauman, Z. (1987) Interpreters and Legislators: On Modernity, Postmodernity and Intellectuals. Oxford: Polity Press.
14. See Widdershoven, this issue.
15. Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2000) Personal letter in response to Abma.
16. Ellinor, L. and G. Gerard (1998) Dialogue: Rediscovering the Transformative Power of Conversation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. See Karlsson, this issue.
18. See Abma, this issue.